Abstract
In reconsidering the three “tiers of institutional intelligence” needed for effective institutional research practice he first offered 20 years ago (Terenzini in Res Higher Educ 34:1–10, 1993), Terenzini suggests that those forms of intelligence retain their overall relevance today, but that they also require some important redefinition. The major changes deal with adapting to the dramatic transformations in information technologies and analytical power; greater awareness and responsiveness to the changing state, national, and international educational and political scenes; the need for more extensive familiarity with the research literature, and subtler and more savvy political skills.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adelman, C. (2009). The Bologna process for U.S. eyes: Re-learning higher education in the age of convergence. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.
Adelman, C., Ewell, P., & Gaston, P. (2011, January). The degree qualifications profile. Indianapolis, IN: Lumina Foundation for Education.
Baldridge, J. V. (1971). Power and conflict in the university: Research in the sociology of complex organizations. New York: Wiley.
Berger, J. B., & Milem, J. F. (2000). Organizational behavior in higher education and student outcomes. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XV, pp. 268–338). New York: Agathon.
Bowen, H. R. (Ed.). (1974). Evaluating institutions for accountability. New Directions for Institutional Research, No. 1. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Commission on the Future of Higher Education. (2006). A test of leadership: Charting the future of U.S. higher education. A Report of the Commission Appointed by Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Eaton, J. S. (2008, May). Accreditation, adaptability and the future. Keynote address to the annual meeting of the Association for Institutional Research, Seattle, WA.
Eliot, T. S. (1943). Little gidding. In Four quartets (pp. 49–59). Orlando, FL: Harcourt Books.
Fincher, C. L. (1978). Institutional research as organizational intelligence. Research in Higher Education, 8, 189–192.
Fincher, C. L. (1985). The art and science of institutional research. In M. Corcoran & M. W. Peterson (Eds.), Institutional research in transition (pp. 17–37). New Directions for Institutional Research, No. 46. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Peterson, M. W. (1985). Institutional research: An evolutionary perspective. In M. Corcoran & M. W. Peterson (Eds.), Institutional Research in Transition (pp. 5–15). New Directions for Institutional Research, No. 46. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Roberts, D. F. (2011, January). Notes on informal learning. Briefing paper presented at the Workshop on Key National Education Indicators, sponsored by the National Academy of Science’s Board on Testing and Assessment, Washington, DC.
Schiltz, D. (1978). The gambler [Recorded by Kenny Rogers]. On The gambler [Album]. Los Angeles: United Artists Music and Records Group, Inc.
Schneider, C. G. (2012). President’s message: Where completion goes awry: The metrics for “success” mask mounting problems with quality. Liberal Education, 98(1), 2–5.
Terenzini, P. T. (1993). On the nature of institutional research and the knowledge and skills it requires. Research in Higher Education, 34, 1–10.
Terenzini, P. T. (1995). Evolution and revolution in institutional research. Keynote address to the annual meeting of the Association for Institutional Research, Boston, MA, May 29, 1995.
Tzu, S. (1963). The art of war (S. B. Griffith, Trans.). London: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Terenzini, P.T. “On the Nature of Institutional Research” Revisited: Plus ça Change… ?. Res High Educ 54, 137–148 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-012-9274-3
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-012-9274-3