Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multidimensional Auctions for Public Energy Efficiency Projects: Evidence from Japanese Esco Market

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Competitive bidding is an important policy tool for governments to procure goods and services at the lowest possible cost in the market. Under the traditional public procurement system, however, it is difficult to purchase a highly customized object, such as energy efficiency services, because not only prices but also other nonmonetary aspects need to be taken into account. Multidimensional auctions are useful in such cases. The paper examines the cluster of characteristics of the winning bids of multidimensional auctions for public energy service company (ESCO) projects in Japan. As theory predicts, it is found that the competition effect is significant. Other institutional aspects—such as preannouncement of an energy savings target—are also found important to promote energy efficiency. The results also indicate that the public sector should absorb the regulatory and institutional risks that are related to ESCO projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The weights differ substantially from project to project. For instance, a Czech ESCO project attached 6 % of weight to bid prices. In Germany, the weight of the monetary component is as high as 75 % (Singh et al. 2010).

  2. Asker and Cantillon (2008) show that a single pseudotype of contractor is sufficient to characterize the equilibrium outcome in any multidimensional auction with more than one dimension of private information.

  3. ESCO projects are normally implemented under performance-based contracts.

  4. In our data, the total score data are available for only 38 ESCO projects. Many municipalities do not release individual scores for confidentiality reasons. But the agreed contract terms and general evaluation method are normally widely available.

  5. Detailed criteria may not be exactly the same across auctions. Several criteria, of which the concepts are similar, are aggregated, such as the criteria of high annual revenue and high energy savings. They are different but almost the same from the evaluation perspective, because revenue is linearly dependent on how much energy is saved.

  6. The weights and scoring data are sometimes not disclosed. The availability depends on the public information disclosure rules and guidelines of individual municipalities. The sample selection issue will be discussed in Sect. 6.

  7. Endogenous entry auction theory suggests that given a fixed positive cost of participating in an auction, bidders will enter until their expected profits are driven to the entry cost. At this level no more firms can expect nonnegative profits from new entry.

  8. The reliability and validity of instruments needs to be tested with actual data. See the following section.

  9. In total 171 buildings and facilities are covered by these 100 ESCO projects, because some projects are composed of more than one building (i.e., packaged contracts).

  10. A Heckman procedure is included in our robustness tests, to address the potential problem of the “response bias” that might arise because of the missing data.

  11. Other types of facilities, such as schools, museums and pools, are used as a baseline. The potential effects of these facilities are found to be insignificant, thus these are altogether used as a baseline.

  12. In our data there is an indication that some technologies, such as cogeneration systems, can save more energy than others. However, once the size of project is controlled, technology does not seem to matter much to the bidding strategy. The hypothesis that the coefficients of the major four technologies used in the Japanese ESCO market (i.e., lighting, air condition, hot water boiler and power cogeneration system) are zero cannot be rejected. Thus, the following analysis excludes these technology variables.

  13. The figure counts only leading companies if firms form a bidding coalition, which is a common business practice in the ESCO market.

  14. The shared savings scheme may have other practical advantages. For instance, it may allow the release of governments from some budgetary and operational duties, because ESCO projects can fix energy spending for the long term. In addition, governments do not have to be concerned about daily operations of energy facilities. ESCOs are responsible for operating installed equipment and fixing any mechanical breakdowns.

  15. In the United States, the two models have been used equally, because sub-national governments particularly prefer to finance through low-cost instruments, such as tax-exempt bonds.

  16. Similarly, the City of Montreal is also using disclosure of reserve prices to improve outcomes in snow-removal auctions (Flambard et al. 2007). In French timber auctions, it is estimated that the winning bids would be twice as high if optimal reserve prices were set and announced, rather than using the random reservation prices (Li and Perrigne 2003). However, there seems to be a general hesitation in Japan, perhaps because there is a perceived risk of fostering collusion among bidders (e.g., Saijo et al. 1996; Ohashi 2009).

References

  • Asker, J., & Cantillon, E. (2008). Properties of scoring auctions. RAND Journal of Economics, 39(1), 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branco, F. (1997). The design of multidimensional auctions. RAND Journal of Economics, 28(1), 63–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Che, Y. K. (1993). Design competition through multidimensional auctions. RAND Journal of Economics, 24(4), 668–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cripps, M., & Ireland, N. (1994). The design of auctions and tenders with quality thresholds. Economic Journal, 104, 316–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Silva, D., Dunne, T., Kankanamge, A., & Kosmopoulou, G. (2008). The impact of public information on bidding in highway procurement auctions. European Economic Review, 52, 150–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flambard, V., Lasserre, P., & Mohnen, P. (2007). Snow removal auctions in Montreal: Costs, informational rents and procurement management. Canadian Journal of Economics, 40, 245–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. (2002). Competition and collusion in a government procurement auction market. Atlantic Economic Journal, 30, 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEA (International Energy Agency). (2008). Energy Technology Perspective 2008: Scenarios and Strategies to 2050. Paris: IEA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kessel, R. (1971). A study of the effects of competition in the tax-exempt bond market. The Journal of Political Economy, 79, 706–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D., & Smith, J. (1994). Equilibrium auctions with entry. American Economic Review, 84(3), 585–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, T., & Perrigne, I. (2003). Timber sale auctions with random reserve prices. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, 189–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, T., & Zheng, X. (2009). Entry and competition effects in first-price auctions: theory and evidence from procurement auctions. Review of Economic Studies, 76(4), 1397–1429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAfee, P., & McMillan, J. (1987). Auctions with a stochastic number of bidders. Journal of Economic Theory, 43, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. (2000). An economist’s vision of the B-to-B marketplace. http://www.stanford.edu/~milgrom/publishedarticles/An%20Economist’s%20Vision.pdf.

  • Milgrom, P., & Weber, R. (1982). A theory of auctions and competitive bidding. Econometrica, 50, 1089–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naegelen, F. (2002). Implementing optimal auctions with exogenous quality. Review of Economic Design, 7(2), 135–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohashi, H. (2009). Effects of transparency in procurement practices on government expenditure: A case study of municipal public works. Review of Industrial Organization, 34, 267–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saijo, T., Une, M., & Yamaguchi, T. (1996). “Dango” experiments. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 10, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J., Limaye, D., Henderson, B., & Shi, X. (2010). Public procurement of energy efficiency services: Lessons from international experience. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). (2010). Green economy: Driving green economy through public finance and fiscal policy reform. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. (1977). A bidding model of perfect competition. The Review of Economic Studies, 44, 511–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfstetter, E. (1996). Auctions: an introduction. Journal of Economic Surveys, 10, 367–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2010). World development report 2010: Development and climate change. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worldwatch Institute. (2009). State of the world 2009: Into a warming world. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellner, A., & Theil, H. (1962). Three stage least squares: simultaneous estimate of simultaneous equations. Econometrica, 30, 54–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to express my special thanks to the Jyukankyo Research Institute (JYURI) and the Japan Association of Energy Service Companies (JAESCO) for their collaboration in data collection. I am grateful to the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) and many seminar participants at the Institute of Developing Economies-Japan External Trade Organization (IDE-JETRO) and the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) for their comments and suggestions on an earlier version of this paper. I also acknowledge Matias Herrera Dappe, Antonio Estache, Marianne Fay, Jas Singh, Luis Tineo and Yabei Zhang for their various suggestions. I would like to thank two anonymous referees as well as Lawrence White for their insightful guidance toward publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atsushi Iimi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iimi, A. Multidimensional Auctions for Public Energy Efficiency Projects: Evidence from Japanese Esco Market. Rev Ind Organ 49, 491–514 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-016-9510-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-016-9510-7

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation