Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Grandchild care, intergenerational transfers, and grandparents’ labor supply

  • Published:
Review of Economics of the Household Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One-fifth of children aged below five with employed mothers benefit from grandparent provided child care as their main source of daycare in the US. Using data from the health and retirement study, we investigate how grandchild care needs relate to intergenerational transfers of time and money and grandparents’ labor supply behavior. We find that grandparents with a new born grandchild are more likely to provide grandchild care while married grandparents are also more likely to be employed and provide financial help. Grandparents with grandchildren living close by provided higher time transfers while married grandmothers with resident grandchildren also worked longer hours.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Approximately one third of grandparent headed households have no parents in the household while two thirds have at least one young parent living in the household. The median age of US grandparent caregivers is 57. The majority, 68 % of grandparent caregivers are White while 29 % are African-American.

  2. See Arrondel and Masson (2006) and Laferrère and Wolff (2006) for comprehensive literature reviews on motives behind family transfers.

  3. There are also concerns about potential negative associations between extensive grandchild care and grandparents’ health in the sociological and medical literature (Baker and Silverstein 2008; Fuller-Thomson and Minkler 2000; Hughes et al. 2007; Minkler and Fuller-Thomson 2001). Reinkowski (2013) finds a positive association between occasional grandchild care and health.

  4. Other data sets such as the panel study of income Dynamics allow a researcher to match parents and adult children data. Detailed information on both generations is, however, available only when they live in different households as main respondents. Moreover, transfers recorded concern transfers to and from relatives in general thereby not allowing one to pinpoint how much was given to and from parents as opposed to siblings or aunts and uncles. Datasets such as the Survey of Income and Program Participation, on the other hand, contain information on the grandparent only when the latter lives with the adult children.

  5. Maestas (2010) find that at least 26 % of retirees go back into paid employment.

  6. We note that married grandparents could be providing some grandchild care at separate times so that the lower hours of grandchild care per married grandparent does not necessarily imply that their grandchildren were spending less time in grandparent care.

  7. We focus our study on downward transfers from the grandparent generation to the younger generations. Less than 6 % of respondents received financial transfers from their adult children and only around 1.5 % both received financial transfers from adult children and provided grandchild care so that it does not seem that the majority of grandparents were being paid for providing child care. This is consistent with Jendrek (1993) who finds from case data based on 114 grandparents who provide daily care that 71 % were not paid for providing such care. Thus, it is not surprising that the more casual grandparents caregivers included in the HRS would also not be paid.

  8. The only measure of distance in the HRS is whether adult children (the parents) live within 10 miles of the grandparents.

  9. We do not observe census division of residence of the adult children. However, since it is unlikely that grandparents would be able to provide grandchild care to children who live too far away, using the census division of residence of the grandparents may be a good approximation.

  10. When the grandparent is not working, we impute the wage as the last wage earned. Labor supply regressions based on only the sample of working grandparents yielded similar results as reported in this study.

  11. We are grateful to an anonymous reviewer for pointing this out. Around 3 % of respondents in the HRS had their first grandchild during our sample period.

  12. Similar regressions performed on the amount of financial assistance that married grandparents received from parents showed an increase of $12.6 per week significant at the 5 % level when the grandchild is resident in the grandparent household. This suggests that parents potentially gave higher monetary transfers to grandparents when living together. Approximately 5 % of married grandparents with a resident grandchild received positive financial transfers from parents suggesting that the effect was applicable to a very small proportion of co-resident families.

  13. The effects on financial transfers need to be interpreted with a grain of salt. It is possible that the cost of formal child care is correlated with average prices in the census division of residence. While we have controlled for wages of the grandparents and included census division fixed effects in our regressions, it could still be that the higher financial transfers that grandparents are making are related to higher correlated costs such as education expenses.

  14. This result is qualitatively consistent with the findings of Ying and Marcotte (2007) for three generation families.

  15. Ying and Marcotte (2007) do not find evidence that the decision to take in a grandchild in the household is endogenous to grandparents’ labor supply.

  16. We do not observe hours of grandchild care separately for each adult child but only which adult child benefited from grandchild care. On the other hand, financial transfers are observed separately for each adult child in the HRS.

  17. In an attempt to analyze time allocations relationships with a first grandchild, we performed similar analysis as in our baseline models by also including respondents with children but without grandchildren in the sample. We distinguish between having a first grandchild as opposed to additional grandchildren by including a dummy variable taking value one if respondents had their first grandchild and zero otherwise, and another dummy variable taking value one if respondents had an additional grandchild and zero otherwise. We find that first time grandparents were between 2 and 27 % more likely to provide grandchild care and on average provided 0.4–1 additional hours of grandchild care. The effects were statistically significant for married grandparents. Similarly, grandparents with an additional grandchild were 8–14 % more likely to provide grandchild care and on average provided 0.27–1 h of additional grandchild care hours. The effects were statistically significant at the 5 % level for all grandparents. Single grandmothers with a first grandchild were more 5 % likely to be employed while single and married grandfathers with an additional grandchild were also more likely to be employed by 6 and 1.5 % respectively. We found no statistically significant impacts on labor hours. Full tables are available upon request.

References

  • Andreoni, J. (1989). Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy, 97(6), 1447–1458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrondel, L., & Masson, A. (2006). Altruism, exchange or indirect reciprocity: What do the data on family transfers show? Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity, 2, 971–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, L. A., & Silverstein, M. (2008). Depressive symptoms among grandparents raising grandchildren: The impact of participation in multiple roles. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 6(3), 285–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. (1974). Are government bonds net wealth? Journal of Political Economy, 82(6), 1095–1117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1974). A theory of social interactions. Journal of Political Economy, 82(6), 1063–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtson, V. (2001). Beyond the nuclear family: The increasing importance of multigenerational bonds. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, D. B., Shleifer, A., & Summers, L. H. (1985). The strategic bequest motive. Journal of Political Economy, 93(6), 1045–1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, S., Seltzer, J., Song, X., & Schoeni, R. (2012). Money and time transfers from parents to adult children in the United States: New evidence on between and within family differences from the June 2012 survey of consumers. Manuscript.

  • Brown, M. (2005). Informal care and the division of end-of-life transfers. Journal of Human Resources, 41(1), 191–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardia, E., & Ng, S. (2003). Intergenerational time transfers and child care. Review of Economic Dynamics, 6, 431–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compton, J. (2013). Family proximity and the labor force status of women in Canada. Review of Economics of the Household,. doi:10.1007/s11150-013-9179-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compton, J., & Pollak, R. A. (2013). Family proximity, childcare and women’s labor force attachment. Journal of Urban Economics. 10.1016/j.jue.2013.03.00.

  • Cox, D. (1987). Motives for private income transfers. Journal of Political Economy, 95(3), 508–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D., & Rank, M. R. (1992). Inter vivos transfers and intergenerational exchange. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 74(2), 305–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Boca, D. (2002). The effect of child care and part time opportunities on participation and fertility decisions in Italy. Journal of Population Economics, 15(3), 549–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller-Thomson, E., & Minkler, M. (2000). The mental and physical health of grandmothers who are raising their grandchildren. Journal of Mental Health and Aging, 6, 311–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, C. (2012). Optimal disability insurance with informal child care. Centre for Silver Security WP CSS-WP-04-201.

  • Ho, C. (2013). Welfare-to-work reform and intergenerational support: A look at elderly women’s response to the 1996 PRWORA. Manuscript.

  • Ho, C., & Pavoni, N. (2012). The joint design of Social Security and unemployment insurance. Manuscript.

  • Hughes, M. E., Waite, L. J., La Pierre, T. A., & Luo, Y. (2007). All in the family: The impact of caring for grandchildren on grandparents’ health. Journal of Gerontology, 62(2), S108–S199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jendrek, M. P. (1993). Grandparents who parent their grandchildren: Effects on lifestyle. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55(3), 609–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laferrère, A., & Wolff, F.-C. (2006). Microeconomic models of family transfers. Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity, 2, 889–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin, L. (2010). Who’s minding the kids? Child care arrangements. US Census Bureau.

  • Lei, X. (2008). Grandchild care, financial transfers and grandma’s labor market decisions. Manuscript.

  • Leibowitz, A., Klerman, J. A., & Waite, L. J. (1992). Employment of new mothers and child care choice. Journal of Human Resources, 27(1), Special Issue on Child Care, 112–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Anuarbe, M. (2013). Intergenerational transfers in long term care. Review of Economics of the Household, 11, 235–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maestas, N. (2010). Back to work: Expectations and realizations of work after retirement. Journal of Human Resources, 45(3), 718–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer-Fazio, M., Connelly, R., Chen, L., & Tang, L. (2011). Childcare, eldercare and labor force participation of married women in urban China, 1982–2000. Journal of Human Resources, 46(2), 261–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarry, K., & Schoeni, R. F. (1995). Transfer behavior in the health and retirement study: measurement and the distribution of resources within the family. Journal of Human Resources, 30, Special Issue on Health and Retirement Study, S184–S226.

  • Minkler, M., & Fuller-Thomson, E. (2001). Physical and mental health status of American grandparents providing extensive child care to their grandchildren. Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association, 56(4), 199–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pezzin, L. E., Pollak, R., & Schone, B. S. (2007). Efficiency in family bargaining: living arrangements and caregiving decisions of adult children and disabled elderly parents. CESifo Economic Studies, 53(1), 69–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pezzin, L. E., Pollak, R., & Schone, B. S. (2009). Long-term care of the disabled elderly: Do children increase caregiving by spouses? Review of Economics of the Household, 7, 323–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pezzin, L. E., & Schone, B. S. (1999). Intergenerational household formation, female labor supply and informal caregiving: A bargaining approach. Journal of Human Resources, 34(3), 475–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posadas, J., & Vidal-Fernández, M. (2012). Grandparent’s childcare and female labor force participation. IZA discussion paper no. 6398.

  • Reinkowski, J. (2013). Should we care that they care? Grandchild care and its impact on grandparent health. Ifo working paper no. 165.

  • Rosenzweig, M. R., & Wolpin, K. I. (1994). Parental and public transfers to young women and their children. American Economic Review, 84(5), 1195–1212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki, M. (2002). The causal effect of family structure on labor force participation among Japanese married women. Journal of Human Resources, 37(2), 429–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoeni, R. F. (2002). Does unemployment insurance displace familial assistance? Public Choice, 110, 99–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soldo, B. J., & Hill, M. S. (1995). Family structure and transfer measures in the health and retirement study: Background and overview. Journal of Human Resources, 30, Special Issue on Health and Retirement Study, S108–S137.

  • Ying, W., & Marcotte, D. E. (2007). Golden years? The labor market effects of caring for grandchildren. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 1283–1296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank James Banks, Samuel Belinsky, Soshana Grossbard, Hilary Hoynes, Kathleen McGarry, Costas Meghir, Nicola Pavoni, Ian Preston, Ken Yamada, and two anonymous reviewers for insightful comments and suggestions. All mistakes remain my own.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Ho.

Appendix: Sensitivity analysis

Appendix: Sensitivity analysis

See Tables 6, 7 and 8.

Table 6 Grandchild care needs and time transfers
Table 7 Grandchild care needs and money transfers
Table 8 Grandchild care needs and grandparents’ labor supply

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ho, C. Grandchild care, intergenerational transfers, and grandparents’ labor supply. Rev Econ Household 13, 359–384 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-013-9221-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-013-9221-x

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation