Skip to main content
Log in

Testing Calendar Effects of International Equity and Real Estate Markets

  • Published:
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 31 August 2017

This article has been updated

Abstract

There are a lot of previous studies on calendar effects. However, most of them use traditional methods like regression. Hui et al. Habitat International 48, 38–45, (2015b) incorporated Shiryaev-Zhou index with logistic regression to study the Halloween and January effects of eight securitized real estate markets, but they fixed the moving-window size to be 130 days. How the change in moving-window size affects the calendar effects cannot be seen. In this study, we also apply the Shiryaev-Zhou index, but we allow the moving-window size to vary. Furthermore, we incorporated Shiryaev-Zhou index with analysis of mean (ANOM) and logistic regression to examine calendar effects of general equity and securitized real estate indices of Hong Kong, Japan, US, UK, France and Germany during the period 1996 – 2014. The results show that our new methods can detect additional channels of significant calendar effects of which normal methods fail to show. Furthermore, the general equity indices show significant Halloween and January effects. However, for the securitized real estate indices, the Halloween and January effects are less significant or even go into reverse in some cases. This study has two main implications. Firstly, investors can formulate a better trading strategy to earn more profits. Secondly, trends and phenomena found in equity markets may not be applicable to real estate markets, so investment rules on equity markets may not work on real estate markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 31 August 2017

    An erratum to this article has been published.

References

  • Agrawal, A., & Tandon, K. (1994). Anomalies or illusions? Evidence from stock markets in eighteen countries. Journal of International Money and Finance, 13(1), 83–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almudhaf, F., & Hansz, J. (2011). Systematic equity return patterns in listed European property companies. International Real Estate Review, 14(1), 61–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrade, S., Chhaochharia, V., & Fuerst, M. (2012). “Sell in May and Go Away” Just Won’t Go Away. Available at SSRN 2115197.

  • Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2000). Trading is hazardous to your wealth: The common stock investment performance of individual investors. Journal of Finance, 55(2), 773–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouman, S., & Jacobsen, B. (2002). The Halloween Indicator, “Sell in May and Go Away”: Another Puzzle. The American Economic Review, 92(5), 1618–1635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VC Brokerage Limited (2015). Hong Kong/China Market. http://www.vcgroup.com.hk/Host/VC/UserFiles/File/Research/2015/09/20150907_0071.pdf. Assessed 5 February 2016.

  • Brounen, D., & Ben-Hamo, Y. (2009). Calendar anomalies: the case of international property shares. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 38(2), 115–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, K. C., & Coutts, J. A. (1999). The January effect and monthly seasonality in the Hang Seng index: 1985–97. Applied Economics Letters, 6(2), 121–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Toit, J., & Peskir, G. (2008). Selling a stock at the ultimate maximum. The Annals Applied Probability, 19, 983–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fountas, S., & Segredakis, K. N. (2002). Emerging stock markets return seasonalities: the January effect and the tax-loss selling hypothesis. Applied Financial Economics, 12(4), 291–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, A. Y. (2002). The predictability of house prices. Journal of Real Estate Research, 24(3), 213–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, A. Y. (2003). The declining January effect: evidences from the US equity markets. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 43(2), 395–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P. R., Lunde, A., & Nason, J. M. (2005). Testing the significance of Calendar Effects. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Working Paper, (2005–02).

  • Hardin, W., III, Liano, K., & Huang, G. (2005). Real estate investment trusts and calendar anomalies: revisited. International Real Estate Review, 8(1), 83–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatemi-J, A. & Roca, E. (2010). The impact of the US real Estate market on other major markets during normal and crisis periods (No. finance: 201003). Griffith University, Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics.

  • Hui, E. C. M., & Chan, K. K. K. (2014). The global financial crisis: Is there any contagion between real estate and equity markets? Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 405, 216–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui, E. C. M., & Chan, K. K. K. (2015a). A new time-dependent trading strategy for securitized real estate and equity indices, forthcoming.

  • Hui, E. C. M., & Chan, K. K. K. (2015b). Testing calendar effects on global securitized real estate markets by Shiryaev-Zhou index. Habitat International, 48, 38–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui, E. C. M., & Yam, S. C. P. (2014). Can we beat the “buy-and-hold” strategy? Analysis on European and American securitized real estate indices. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 18(1), 28–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui, E. C. M., & Zheng, X. (2012). The dynamic correlation and volatility of real estate price and rental: an application of MSV model. Applied Economics, 44(23), 2985–2995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui, E. C. M., Yam, S. C. P., & Chen, S. W. (2012). Shiryaev-Zhou index – a noble approach to benchmarking and analysis of real estate stocks. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 16(2), 158–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui, E. C. M., Wang, Z., Yiu, C. K. F., & Wong, H. (2013). Inside information of real estate developers. Habitat International, 40, 244–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui, E. C. M., Wright, J. A., & Yam, S. C. P. (2014). Calendar effects and real estate securities. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 49(1), 91–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, B., & Visaltanachoti, N. (2009). The Halloween effect in US sectors. Financial Review, 44(3), 437–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, S. H., Jiang, Z., Lee, Y., & Yoon, S. M. (2010). Weather effects on the returns and volatility of the Shanghai stock market. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 389(1), 91–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keim, D. B. (1983). Size-related anomalies and stock return seasonality: further empirical evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 12(1), 13–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lean, H. H. (2011). The Halloween puzzle in selected Asian stock markets. International Journal of Economics and Management, 5, 216–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucey, B. M., & Whelan, S. F. (2002). A promising timing strategy in equity markets. Journal of the Statistical and Social Inquiry Society of Ireland, 31, 74–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maberly, E. D., & Pierce, R. (2004). Stock market efficiency withstands another challenge: Solving the “sell in May/buy after Halloween” puzzle. Econ Journal Watch, 1(1), 29–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malkiel, B. G. (2003). The efficient market hypothesis and its critics. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malkiel, B. G. (2005). Reflections on the efficient market hypothesis: 30 years later. Financial Review, 40(1), 1–9.

  • Malkiel, B. G., & Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiryaev, A. N., Xu, Z., & Zhou, X. Y. (2008). Thou shalt buy and hold. Quantitative Finance, 8(8), 765–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, R., Timmermann, A., & White, H. (2001). Dangers of data mining: the case of calendar effects in stock returns. Journal of Econometrics, 105(1), 249–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wachtel, S. B. (1942). Certain observations on seasonal movements in stock prices. The Journal of Business of the University of Chicago, 15(2), 184–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, W. K., Wright, J. A., Yam, S. C. P., & Yung, S. P. (2012). A mixed Sharpe ratio. Risk and Decision Analysis, 3, 37–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yam, S. C. P., Yung, S. P., & Zhou, W. (2009). Two rationales behind ‘buy-and-hold or sell-at-once’. Journal of Applied Probabbility, 46, 651–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yam, S. C. P., Yung, S. P., & Zhou, W. (2012a). A unified ‘bang-bang’ principle with respect to R-invariant performance benchmarks. Theory of Probability and Its Applications, 57(2), 405–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yam, S. C. P., Yung, S. P., & Zhou, W. (2012b). Optimal selling time in stock market over a finite time horizon. Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica, 28(3), 557–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the financial support from the PolyU Internal Research Grants (Project # B-Q42Q, G-UA6V and G-YBJL).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eddie C. M. Hui.

Additional information

The original version of this article was revised: a modification has been made to Table 4. The correct version of the table can also be found in the erratum for this article.

An erratum to this article is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-017-9616-1.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hui, E.C.M., Chan, K.K.K. Testing Calendar Effects of International Equity and Real Estate Markets. J Real Estate Finan Econ 56, 140–158 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-016-9564-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-016-9564-1

Keywords

Navigation