Skip to main content
Log in

Do Investors Infer Vocal Cues from CEOs During Quarterly REIT Conference Calls?

  • Published:
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine the investor reaction to emotionally charged information. Using audio files of quarterly earnings conference calls and specialized Layered Voice Analysis software, we isolate the emotional content of managers’ vocal cues. With results that are both statistically and economically significant, we find that executive emotion is positively related to investors’ initial reaction. Moreover, this strong investor reaction to emotional signals by REIT managers appears to be justified, suggesting that credible, value-relevant information is contained in the emotion related signals. However, we also find some limited evidence of a partial reversal in subsequent trading windows, suggesting that investors may second guess themselves or fear they overreacted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Comments made in a speech at Fordham Law School in New York as reported in a Wall Street Journal blog by Emily Chasan, “SEC Chairman: New Rules Could Lead to ‘Information Overload’”, 10/4/13 12:39 pm, accessed 1/28/14 2:30 pm.

    http://blogs.wsj.com/cfo/2013/10/04/sec-chairman-new-rules-could-lead-to-information-overload/

  2. See, for example, the Wall Street Journal article “App Tells You How You Feel” by Amir Mizroch, 3/10/14 7:17 pm, accessed 3/11/14 9:27 am.

    http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303824204579421242295627138?alg=y

  3. A more detailed discussion of this important feature follows in the background section below.

  4. Emily Chasan, “Mary Jo White Wants SEC to ‘Rethink’ Corporate Disclosures”, 1/27/14 12:55 pm, accessed 1/28/14 2:11 pm.

    http://blogs.wsj.com/cfo/2014/01/27/mary-jo-white-wants-sec-to-rethink-corporate-disclosures/

  5. Max Colchester, “Banks Listen In to Trader Talk”, 12/5/13 7:19 am, accessed 12/5/13 11:01 am.

    http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304096104579239564055355146

  6. To increase uniformity of the REIT sample as much as possible, in addition to implementing standard controls (e.g., firm size, book-to-market equity, and so forth) we also control for property sector using data from SNL Financial since firms within the REIT industry have become more focused on single asset types over time.

  7. There is an intermediate step where REITs use their limited cash holdings and short-term lines of credit to fund initial acquisitions on a timely basis. However, in the long-run they are subject to an exogenous capital constraint and must turn to the capital markets for continued growth. For example, Ott et al. (2005) find that 84 % of REIT investment is financed by equity and long-term debt. See Hardin and Hill (2008), Hardin et al. (2009), and An et al. (2012) for discussions of REIT cash holdings and revolving debt utilization.

  8. In contrast to Mayew and Venkatachalam (2012a) who parse the first five minutes of each call due to the labor-intensive nature of the process, we parse all speakers for the entire call. In later analysis, we find that our results are concentrated in the vocal cues of the CEO. This is not surprising given the CEO’s role as corporate figurehead. Mayew and Venkatachalam (2012a) also find CEO speech to matter more than CFO speech and limit their reporting and discussion to CEO driven results. For brevity, we report variables which stem from the LVA software and the corresponding results for the CEO only.

  9. Mayew and Venkatachalam (2012a) accomplish a similar check using the earnings surprise, where they argue that a negative earnings surprise will increase investor scrutiny. We contend that managers may be challenged on a call even when the earnings surprise is positive and the Cognitive variable allows us to tease out such a condition. Nonetheless, we repeat our analysis following the Mayew and Venkatachalam approach for separating high and low scrutiny using positive and negative earnings surprises and obtain consistent results.

  10. While descriptive statistics for all variables are in Table 1, a complete correlation table is included in the Appendix.

  11. The LVAi 7.7 output can potentially range from 1 through 8, however there are no observations in the sample with values of 1 or 2.

  12. For a partial list of studies which use Diction for word recognition and categorization see the company’s website, http://www.dictionsoftware.com/published-studies/#peerarticles. A non-exhaustive list of financially oriented research using Diction includes Rogers et al. (2011), Davis et al. (2012), and Davis and Tama-Sweet (2012). Li (2010) provides an early review of textual analysis in financially oriented disclosure research.

  13. A tone measure of 0 would indicate a call that is tone neutral, 1 would indicate a call devoid of negative words, and −1 would indicate the complete absence of positive words.

  14. http://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html

  15. We also separately run our analysis using four additional benchmarks for computing abnormal returns including the daily returns to the equity REIT index from NAREIT, the S&P 500 index, the CRSP value weighted index, and the CRSP equal weighted index. We further check our results using a market model for abnormal return estimation. The untabulated results are robust to model and benchmark variation.

  16. Following Mayew and Venkatachalam (2012a), we now report p-values using one-tailed tests for our variables of interest (Emotion and Cognitive) given that we now have a more definitive expectation with respect to the direction of the signs based on the unconditional correlations from Table 1 and the portfolio level sorts in Table 2, Panel A.

  17. We obtain consistent results (untabulated) when isolating abnormal returns to just the call date itself (trading-day t = 0). Moreover, when we isolate the week running up to the call date (trading-days t = −5 through t = −1) our variables of interest (Emotion/Cognitive) are not significant (untabulated). Thus, the reaction to the emotionally charged signals cannot be misconstrued as a reaction to pre-call information leakage.

References

  • Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1993). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(2), 256–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • An, H., Cook, D. O., & Zumpano, L. V. (2011). Corporate transparency and firm growth: evidence from real estate investment trusts. Real Estate Economics, 39(3), 429–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • An, H., Hardin, W., & Wu, Z. (2012). Information asymmetry and corporate liquidity management: evidence from real estate investment trusts. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 45(3), 678–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, R. T., Brown, M. G., Diaz, J., Gibler, K. M., & Grissom, T. V. (2003). Behavioral research in real estate: a search for the boundaries. Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education, 6(1), 85–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, B. M., Hill, M. D., & Wang, H. (2011). REIT short sales and return predictability. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 42(4), 481–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, M., Capozza, D., & Seguin, P. (1998). Dividend policy and cash flow uncertainty. Real Estate Economics, 26(4), 555–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockman, P., Li, X., & Price, S. M. (2015). Differences in conference call tones: managers versus analysts. Financial Analysts Journal, 71(4), 24–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., Hillegeist, S. A., & Lo, K. (2004). Conference calls and information asymmetry. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(3), 343–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capozza, D. R., & Seguin, P. J. (1999). Focus, transparency, and value: the REIT evidence. Real Estate Economics, 27(4), 587–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, S. H., Erickson, J., & Wang, K. (2003). Real estate investment trusts: Structure, performance, and investment opportunities. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chui, A. C. W., Titman, S., & Wei, K. C. J. (2003). Intra-industry momentum: the case of REITs. Journal of Financial Markets, 6(3), 363–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. K., & Tama-Sweet, I. (2012). Managers’ use of language across alternative disclosure outlets: earnings press releases versus MD&A. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(3), 804–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. K., Piger, J. M., & Sedor, L. M. (2012). Beyond the numbers: measuring the information content of earnings press release language. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(3), 845–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey, S. J., Harrison, D. M., Luchtenberg, K. F., & Seiler, M. J. (2012). Financial opacity and firm performance: the readability of REIT annual reports. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 45(2), 450–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doran, J. S., Peterson, D. R., & Price, S. M. (2012). Earnings conference call content and stock price: the case of REITs. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 45(2), 402–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, R. M., Johnson, M., & Skinner, D. J. (1999). An empirical examination of conference calls as a voluntary disclosure medium. Journal of Accounting Research, 37(1), 133–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, W. (1999). Behavioral research into heuristics and bias as an academic pursuit Lessons from other disciplines and implications for real estate. Journal of Property Investment and Finance, 17(4), 333–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, W., & Hill, M. D. (2008). REIT dividend determinants: excess dividends and capital markets. Real Estate Economics, 36(2), 349–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, W., Liano, K., & Huang, G. C. (2005). REIT stock splits and market efficiency. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 33(3), 297–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, W., Highfield, M. J., Hill, M. D., & Kelly, G. W. (2009). The determinants of REIT cash holdings. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 39(1), 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartzell, J. C., Kallberg, J. G., & Liu, C. H. (2005). The role of the underlying real asset market in REIT IPOs. Real Estate Economics, 33(1), 27–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartzell, J. C., Kallberg, J. G., & Liu, C. H. (2008). The role of corporate governance in initial public offerings: evidence from real estate investment trusts. Journal of Law and Economics, 51(3), 539–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, J. L., Mayew, W. J., & Venkatachalam, M. (2012). Analyzing speech to detect financial misreporting. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(2), 349–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javers, E. (2010). Broker, trader, lawyer, spy: The secret world of corporate espionage. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kappas, A., Hess, U., & Scherer, K. R. (1991). Voice and emotion. In B. Rime & R. S. Feldman (Eds.), Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior (pp. 200–238). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimbrough, M. D. (2005). The effect of conference calls on analyst and market underreaction to earnings announcements. The Accounting Review, 80(1), 189–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, F. (2010). Textual analysis of corporate disclosures: a survey of the literature. Journal of Accounting Literature, 29(1), 143–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, F. (2012). Discussion of analyzing speech to detect financial misreporting. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(2), 393–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2011). When is a liability not a liability? textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10-Ks. Journal of Finance, 66(1), 35–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, D., Pronk, M., & Roelofsen, E. (2011). What makes conference calls useful? the information content of managers’ presentations and analysts discussion sessions. The Accounting Review, 86(4), 1383–1414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayew, W. J., & Venkatachalam, M. (2012a). The power of voice: managerial affective states and future firm performance. Journal of Finance, 67(1), 1–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayew, W. J., & Venkatachalam, M. (2012b). Speech analysis in financial markets. Foundations and Trends in Accounting, 7(2), 73–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, S. H., Riddiough, T. J., & Yi, H. C. (2005). Finance, investment and investment performance: evidence from the REIT sector. Real Estate Economics, 33(1), 203–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, S. M., Doran, J. S., Peterson, D. R., & Bliss, B. A. (2012a). Earnings conference calls and stock returns: the incremental informativeness of conference call tone. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36(4), 992–1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, S. M., Gatzlaff, D. H., & Sirmans, C. F. (2012b). Information uncertainty and the post-earnings-announcement drift anomaly: insights from REITs. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 44(1/2), 250–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, S. M., Salas, J. M., & Sirmans, C. F. (2015). Governance, conference calls and CEO compensation. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 50(2), 181–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riddiough, T. J., & Wu, Z. (2009). Financial constraints, liquidity management and investment. Real Estate Economics, 37(3), 447–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, J. L., Van Buskirk, A., & Zechman, S. L. C. (2011). Disclosure tone and shareholder litigation. Accounting Review, 86(6), 2155–2183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, K., Erickson, J., & Gau, G. (1993). Dividend policies and dividend announcement effects for real estate investment trusts. Real Estate Economics, 21(2), 185–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Amir Liberman, CEO of Nemesysco, for providing access to the proprietary Layered Voice Analysis software. This paper benefited greatly from multiple conversations with, and LVA assistance from, Bill Mayew. We also acknowledge valuable feedback from Stephen Dempsey, Mike Highfield, Matt Hill, Masaki Mori, two anonymous reviewers, and seminar participants at the University of Connecticut and the 2014 AREUEA International Conference. We are grateful to Brad Case and NAREIT for providing index data. All remaining errors are our own.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. McKay Price.

Appendix

Appendix

(Table 10).

Table 10 Unconditional correlations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Price, S.M., Seiler, M.J. & Shen, J. Do Investors Infer Vocal Cues from CEOs During Quarterly REIT Conference Calls?. J Real Estate Finan Econ 54, 515–557 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-016-9557-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-016-9557-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation