Skip to main content
Log in

Discussion of “biases in multi-year management financial forecasts: Evidence from private venture-backed U.S. companies”

  • Published:
Review of Accounting Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Armstrong, Dávila, Foster, and Hand (“ADFH”) use a proprietary venture capital database of revenue and profit projections submitted by young firms seeking financing to attempt to address a number of questions related to forecasts by managers of early stage, venture-backed, private entrepreneurial firms. The proprietary dataset together with the creative use of a “historically-grounded conditional projections” methodology are the most interesting features of ADFH’s study. However, these same aspects give rise to empirical design constraints that the study does not fully overcome. In addition, there are numerous leaps of logic required to arrive at some of ADFH’s conclusions and there are alternative explanations for ADFH’s findings that have not been entirely refuted. This leaves the reader with some doubt as to whether all of ADFH’s conclusions are fully substantiated. Nevertheless, the evidence presented makes an interesting contribution to our understanding of the forecasting behavior of young, private, rapidly growing, VCbacked firms, and provides some natural economic and methodological leads into further studies of these issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Blinder (1973) reports R 2s of 45% to 49% (Table A-1) and the models of Oaxaca (1973) generate R 2s of 33% to 56% (Table 1).

  2. In contrast, the previously referenced labor economics papers report separate and detailed regression results for each of their relevant labor groups. For example, the studies of Blinder (1973) and Oaxaca (1973) report the detailed results of each of their separate regressions (e.g., white males, black males, white females, black females, etc) that include the coefficient estimates on 35 to 45 explanatory variables.

  3. Campbell et al. (2001) do not separately model the biotech industry, so the third of ADFH’s identifiable sectors’ firm-specific volatilities are not explicitly considered here.

References

  • Blinder, A. S. (1973). Wage discrimination: Reduced form and structural variables. Journal of Human Resources, 8, 436–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, B. R., & Bradshaw, M. T. (2004). Analysts, Lies, and Statistics: Cutting Through the Hype in Corporate Earnings Announcements. New York: Institutional Investor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. Y., Lettau, M., Malkiel, B., & Xu, Y. (2001). Have individual stocks become more volatile? An empirical exploration of idiosyncratic risk. Journal of Finance, 56, 1–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faul, J. L., Demers, E. A., Burke, C. M., & Poulter, L. W. (1999) The reproducibility of repeat measures of airway inflammation in stable atopic asthma. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 160, 1457–1461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joos, P., & Zhdanov, A. (2006). Earnings and Equity Valuation in the Biotech Industry: Theory and Evidence. Tilburg University.

  • Oaxaca, R. (1973). Male–female wage differentials in urban labor markets. International Economic Review, 14, 693–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiller, R. J. (2000) Irrational Exuberance. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Anne Demers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Demers, E.A. Discussion of “biases in multi-year management financial forecasts: Evidence from private venture-backed U.S. companies”. Rev Acc Stud 12, 217–225 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-007-9027-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-007-9027-2

JEL Classifications

Keywords

Navigation