Abstract
There have been a number of studies that indicate that analysts recommendations are superior to other forecasts, such as those by time-series models, and add economic benefit, adjusted for transaction costs, to clients who first receive and then use analysts’ forecasts. There is also academic literature documenting the use of accounting information in valuing firms by analysts and others, the use of financial information from other sources than the firm itself by analysts, the impact of management guidance on decisions made by analysts, and the concept of herd behavior among analysts. The majority of studies about analysts have used sell-side analyst data to reach their findings. However, there has been little research involving buy-side analysts, analysts who are employed by institutional investors to provide stock purchase recommendations to their employers for internal investment decision making purposes. The research there has studied investments by institutional investors, many of which employ buy-side analysts. The purpose of this study is to add to the literature by investigating what information buy-side analysts use in arriving at their stock investment recommendations. This study also investigates whether or not buy-side analysts are predominantly influenced by the information they receive from publicly available accounting data, other available public information, other analysts or management guidance. The data for this investigation is being obtained from a survey of buy-side analysts. A list of 130 analysts was prepared and asked to take the survey. The use of a survey to gather the data was consistent with the use in prior studies. The PLS approach to structural equation analysis was used to assess the measurement model because it can be used for theory confirmation and suggest possible relationships, and because it is more suitable for prediction since it assumes that all measured variance can be explained in a study. The SEM-based method has been described as a coupling of two traditions: an econometric perspective focusing on prediction and a psychometric emphasis that models concepts as latent (unobserved)variables that are indirectly inferred from multiple observed measures (alternately termed as indicators or manifest variables). This method allows for the performance of path analytic modeling and has been referred to as a second generation of multivariate analysis. The results of this study further the academic literature concerning analysts by investigating what information buy-side analysts use to arrive at their overall stock investment recommendations and by the use of the PLS approach.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
M. E. Barth and A. P. Hutton, Information intermediaries and the pricing of accruals, Stanford University, 2000.
B. J. Bushee, “Do institutional investors prefer near-term earnings over long-run value?,” Contemporary Accounting Research, 18, 207–246, (2001).
B. J. Bushee, D. A. Matsumoto, and G. S. Miller, “Managerial and investor responses to disclosure regulation: The case of reg fd and conference calls,” Accounting Review, 79, 617–643, (2004).
B. J. Bushee and G. S. Miller, “Investor relations, firm visibility, and investor following,” Accounting Review, 87, 867–897, (2012).
B. J. Bushee and C. F. Noe, “Corporate disclosure practices, institutional investors, and stock return volatility,” Journal of Accounting Research, 38, 171–202, (2000).
W. W. Chin, “Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling,” MIS Quarterly, 22, vii–xvi, 1998.
W. W. Chin, “Partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling,” in G. A. Marcoulides, (ed.) Modern Methods for Business Research, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 295–336, 1998.
W. W. Chin, B. L. Marcolin, and P. R. Newsted, “A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study,” Information Systems Research, 14, 189–217, (2003).
W. W. Chin and P. Newsted, “Structural equation modeling: Analysis with small samples using partial least squares,” in R. Hoyle (ed.) Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research, SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 307–341, 1999.
Lal C. Chugh and Joseph W. Meador, “The stock valuation process: The analysts’ view,” Financial Analysts Journal, 40, pp. 41–48, (1984).
D. DelGuercio, “The distorting effect of the prudent-man laws on institutional equity investments,” Journal of Financial Economics, 40 31–62, 1996.
E. G. Falkenstein, “Preferences for stock characteristics as revealed by mutual fund portfolio holdings,” Journal of Finance, 51, 111–135, 1996.
FASB, Recognition and Measurement in Financial Statements of Business Enterprises, 1986.
T. J. Fogarty and R. K. Rogers, “Financial analysts’ reports: an extended institutional theory evaluation,” Accounting Organizations and Society, 30, 331–356, 2005.
C. Fornell, “A second generation of multivariate analysis: Classification of methods and implications for marketing research,” in M. J. Houston (ed.) Review of Marketing, American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL, pp. 407 – 450, 1987.
J. Francis and L. Soffer, “The relative informativeness of analysts’ stock recommendations and earnings forecast revisions,” Journal of Accounting Research, 35, 193–211, 1997.
D. Gefen and D. Straub, “A practical guide to factorial validity using pls-graph: tutorial and annotated example,” Communications of AIS, 16, 91–109, 2005.
D. Givoly and J. Lakonishok, “Properties of analysts’ forecast of earnings: A review and analysis of the research,” Journal of Accounting Literature, 3, 117–152, 1984.
P. A. Gompers and A. Metrick, “Institutional investors and equity prices,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 229–259, 1984.
J. F. Hair, R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham, and W. C. Black, Multivariate data analysis with readings, 4 ed., Pretice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1995.
A. Hutton Healy, P. and K. Palepu, “Stock performance and intermediation changes surrounding sustained increases in disclosure,” Contemporary Accounting Research, 16, 485–520, 1999.
C. Hessel and M. Norman, “Financial characteristics and neglected and institutionally held stocks,” Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 313–334, 1992.
H. Hong, J. D. Kubik, and A. Solomon, “Security analysts’ career concerns and herding of earnings forecasts,” Rand Journal of Economics, 31, 121–144, 2000.
C. Hongren, Implications from accountants on the uses of financial statements by securities analysts, Dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 1978.
A. P. Hutton, G. S. Miller, and D. J. Skinner, “The role of supplementary statements with management earnings forecasts,” Journal of Accounting Research, 41, 867–890, 2003.
C. D. Ittner and D. F. Larcker, “Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators of financial performance? an analysis of customer satisfaction,” Journal of Accounting Research, 36, 1–35, 1998.
C. D. Ittner, D. F. Larcker, and M. V. Rajan, “The choice of performance measures in annual bonus contracts,” Accounting Review, 72, 231–255, 1997.
M. D. Kaplowitz, T. D. Hadlock, and R. Levine, “A comparison of web and mail survey response rates,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 68, 94–101, 2004.
S. P. Kothari, “Capital markets research in accounting,” Journal of Accounting & Economics, 31, 105–231, 2001.
W. G. Lewellen, R. C. Lease, and G. G. Schlarbaum, “Patterns of investment strategy and behavior among individual investors,” Journal of Business, 50, 296–333, 1977.
W. G. Lewellen, R. C. Lease, and G. G. Schlarbaum, “Personal investments of professional managers,” Financial Management, 8, 28–36, 1979.
R. Libby, R. Bloomfield, and M. W. Nelson, “Experimental research in financial accounting,” Accounting Organizations and Society, 27, 777–812, 2002.
T. Lys and S. K. Sohn, “The association between revisions of financial analysts earnings forecasts and security-price changes,” Journal of Accounting & Economics, 13, no. 4, 341–363, 1990.
S. Mintz and R. Morris, Ethical Obligations and Decision making in Accounting: Text and Cases, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York, 2008.
P. C. Obrien and R. Bhushan, “Analyst following and institutional ownership,” Journal of Accounting Research, 28, 55–76, 1990.
L. Pankoff and R. Virgil, “Some preliminary findings from a laboratory experiment on the usefulness of financial accounting information to security analysts,” Journal of Accounting Research, 8, 1–48, 1970.
R. Bricker T. Robinson Previts, G. and S. Young, “A content analysis of sell-side financial analyst company reports,” Accounting Horizons, 8, 55–70, 1994.
S. Rivard, G. Poirier, L. Raymond, and F. Bergeron, “Development of a measure to assess the quality of user-developed applications,” Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 28, 44–58, 1997.
K. Schipper, “Commentary on earnings management,” Accounting Horizons, 3, 91–102, 1989.
K. Schipper, “Commentary on analysts’ forecasts,” Accounting Horizons, 5, 105–121, 1991.
H. T. Tan, R. Libby, and J. E. Hunton, “Analysts’ reactions to earnings preannouncement strategies,” Journal of Accounting Research, 40, 223–246, 2002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this paper
Cite this paper
Newman, M.R., Gamble, G.O., Chin, W.W., Murray, M.J. (2013). An Investigation of the Impact Publicly Available Accounting Data, Other Publicly Available Information and Management Guidance on Analysts’ Forecasts. In: Abdi, H., Chin, W., Esposito Vinzi, V., Russolillo, G., Trinchera, L. (eds) New Perspectives in Partial Least Squares and Related Methods. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 56. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8283-3_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8283-3_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8282-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8283-3
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)