Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Policy Learning Mechanisms and the Regulation of US Drinking Water

  • Published:
Public Organization Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Can regulatory agencies become learning organizations? The purpose of this article is to assert that they can when the right learning mechanisms are in place. This article utilizes the literatures on US regulatory politics, organizational learning, and policy learning to elaborate the concept of learning mechanisms and examine the circumstances under which they are most likely to be utilized within regulatory agencies. The second half of the article examines the utilization of learning mechanisms within US drinking water regulation during the years when the drinking water policy community was working to formulate and implement the Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments of 1996 (1996–2015). The article concludes by summarizing the findings and offering some propositions for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Announcement of Preliminary Regulatory Determinations for the Contaminants on the Third Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List, (2014) 79 Fed. Reg. 62716.

  • Announcement of Preliminary Regulatory Determinations for the Priority Contaminants on the Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List, (2002) 67 Fed. Reg. 38222.

  • Announcement of Regulatory Determinations for the Priority Contaminants on the Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List, (2003) 68 Fed. Reg. 42898.

  • Announcement of the Draft Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List, (1997) 62 Fed. Reg. 52104.

  • Announcement of the Draft Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List, (1998) 63 Fed. Reg. 10274.

  • Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: theory, method, and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, A., & Foley, P. (2003). Foundations for a learning organization: organizational learning mechanisms. The Learning Organization, 10(2/3), 74–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkland, T. A. (1997). After disaster: agenda setting, public policy, and focusing events. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkland, T. A. (2006). Lessons of disaster: policy change after catastrophic events. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. L., Kenney, M., & Zarkin, M. (2006). Organizational learning in the global context. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busenberg, G. J. (2001). Learning in organizations and public policy. Journal of Public Policy, 21, 173–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, B. J. (1988). Bureaucratic politics and regulatory reform: the EPA and emissions trading. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9, 284–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, S., & Hansen, D. (2004). Learning under pressure: the effects of politicization on organizational learning in public bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, 211–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derthick, M., & Quirk, P. J. (1985). The politics of deregulation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List 2 – Final Notice, (2005) 70 Fed. Reg. 9071.

  • Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List 2 – Notice, (2004) 69 Fed. Reg. 17406.

  • Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List 3 – Draft, (2008) 73 Fed. Reg. 9628.

  • Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List 3 – Final, (2009) 74 Fed. Reg. 51850.

  • Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List 4 – Draft, (2015) 80 Fed. Reg. 6076.

  • Eisner, M. A. (1991). Antitrust and the triumph of economics: institutions, expertise, and policy change. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, M. A. (2000). Regulatory politics in transition (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency (1996). The conceptual approach for contaminant identification. Washington, D.C.: Office of Water.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency (2009). SAB advisory on EPA’s draft third contaminant candidate list. Washington, D.C.: Science Advisory Board, Drinking Water Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorino, D. (2001). Environmental policy as learning: a new view of an old landscape. Public Administration Review, 61, 322–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlak, A. K., & Heikkila, T. (2011). Building a theory of learning in collaboratives: evidence from the everglades restoration program. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 619–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasbergen, P. (1990). Learning to manage the environment. In W. M. Lafferty, & J. Meadowcroft (Eds.), Democracy and the environment: problems and prospects (pp. 175–193). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greener, I. (2001). Social learning and macroeconomic policy in Britain. Journal of Public Policy, 21(2), 133–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habicht II, F. H. (1994). EPA’s vision for setting national environmental priorities. In A. M. Finkel, & D. Golding (Eds.), Worst things first: the debate over risk-based national environmental priorities (pp. 33–46). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25, 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazlett, T.W. (2011). Economic analysis at the Federal Communications Commission: a simple proposal to atone for past sins. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future. Discussion Paper #11–23.

  • Heclo, H. (1974). Modern social politics in Britain and Sweden: from relief to income maintenance. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heikkila, T., & Gerlak, A. K. (2013). Building a conceptual approach to collective learning: lessons from public policy scholars. Policy Studies Journal, 41, 484–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literatures. Organizational Science, 2, 88–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S. (1992). Science, politics, and the renegotiation of expertise at EPA. Osiris, 7, 194–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, R. A. (2001). Adversarial legalism: the American way of law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerwin, C. M., & Furlong, S. R. (2010). Rulemaking: how government agencies write law and make policy (4th ed.). Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavey, W. G. (1993). Inconsistencies in applications of economics at the federal communications commission. Federal Communications Law Journal, 45, 437–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, T. J. (1979). The end of liberalism (2nd ed.). New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, P. J. (1992). Policy learning and failure. Journal of Public Policy, 12(4), 331–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCubbins, M. D., Noll, R. G., & Weingast, B. R. (1987). Administrative procedures as instruments of political control. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 3, 243–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moe, T. M. (1989). The politics of bureaucratic structure. In J. E. Chubb, & P. E. Peterson (Eds.), Can the government govern? (pp. 267–329). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Drinking Water Advisory Council (2004). Report on the CCL classification process to the US environmental protection agency. Washington, D.C.: National Drinking Water Advisory Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1999). Setting priorities for drinking water contaminants. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2001). Classifying drinking water contaminants for regulatory consideration. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, M. (2006). The role of assessments and institutions for policy learning: a study on Swedish climate and nuclear policy formation. Policy Sciences, 38(4), 225–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. J. (1997). Whatever happened to monetarism?: economic policy-making and social learning in the United Kingdom since 1979. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, J. (2009). Continuous improvement: role of organisational learning mechanisms. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 26, 546–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oversight Hearing on the Environmental Protection Agency’s Implementation of the Safe Drinking Water Act’s Unregulated Drinking Water Contaminant Program: Hearing before the Committee on Environment and Public Works, Senate, 112th Cong. (2011). (Testimony of Robert Perciasepe). Retrieved at http://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2011/7/full-committee-hearing-entitled-oversight-hearing-on-the-environmental-protection-agencys-implementation-of-the-safe-drinking-water-acts-unregulated-drinking-water-contaminants-program

  • Pierson, P. (1993). When effect becomes cause: policy feedback and political change. World Politics, 45, 595–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pontius, F. W. (2003). History of the safe drinking water act. In F. W. Pontius (Ed.), Drinking water regulation and health (pp. 71–103). New York: Wiley-Interscience.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, M., & Lipshitz, R. (1998). Organizational learning mechanisms: a structural and cultural approach to organizational learning. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 34(2), 161–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raucher, R. S. (1996). Public health and regulatory considerations of the safe drinking water act. Annual Review of Public Health, 17, 179–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regulatory Determinations Regarding Contaminants on the Second Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List, (2008) 73 Fed. Reg. 44251.

  • Regulatory Determinations Regarding Contaminants on the Second Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List – Preliminary Determinations, (2007) 72 Fed. Reg. 24016.

  • Request for Nominations of Drinking Water Contaminants for the Fourth Contaminant Candidate List, (2012) 77 Fed. Reg. 27057.

  • Rose, R. (1993). Lesson drawing in public policy: a guide to learning across time and space. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, W. A. (2014). Environmental politics and policy (9th ed.). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (Eds.) (1993). Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments of 1996. (1996). P.L. 104–182, August 6th, 1996.

  • Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974. (1974). P.L. 93–523, December 16th, 1974.

  • Shipan, C. R. (1997). Designing judicial review: interest groups, congress, and communications policy. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2011). EPA should improve implementation of requirements on whether to regulate additional contaminants. Washington, D.C.: GAO Report 11–254.

  • Williams, B. A., & Matheny, A. R. (1995). Democracy, dialogues, and environmental disputes: the contested languages of social regulation. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarkin, M. (2010). The FCC and the politics of cable TV regulation, 1952–1980: organizational learning and policy development. Amherst. NY: Cambria Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarkin, M. (2015). Unconventional pollution control politics: the reformation of the US safe drinking water act. Electronic Green Journal, 1(38). Retrieved from www.escholarship.org/uc/search?entity=uclalib_egj;volume=1;issue=38.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Westminster College, 1840 South 1300 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84105, USA

    Michael Zarkin

Authors
  1. Michael Zarkin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Zarkin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zarkin, M. Policy Learning Mechanisms and the Regulation of US Drinking Water. Public Organiz Rev 17, 275–291 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-015-0341-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-015-0341-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation