Skip to main content
Log in

Growth hormone assays: current methodologies and their limitations

  • Published:
Pituitary Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Measurement of circulating growth hormone (GH) concentrations is essential in diagnosis of either GH deficiency or GH excess. The invention of immunoassays for the measurement of peptide hormones was a major breakthrough, enabling the routine analysis of GH concentrations in larger series of samples. Over the last few decades, measurement technology has evolved from less sensitive, mainly radioactive assays based on polyclonal antisera to the latest generations of highly sensitive chemiluminescence methods employing monoclonal antibodies. Unfortunately, the development of newer assays did not lead to better agreement among the results obtained by different assay methods. On the contrary, the differences tended to increase when monoclonal antibody based assays became more popular. The actual value reported for the GH concentration in a specific patient’s sample still mainly depends on the method used by the respective laboratory, limiting the applicability of international consensus guidelines in clinical practice. The heterogeneity of the analyte itself, the availability of different reference preparations for calibration and the interference from matrix components such as GH binding protein are among the reasons why standardizing GH assays is difficult. An additional challenge arose from the availability of a GH receptor antagonist for the treatment of acromegaly, which is basically a mutated form of GH and therefore interferes in many GH assays. This review provides an overview on GH assays used in clinical practice, their limitations and the potential next steps towards standardization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gemzell CA, Heijkenskjold F, Strom L (1955) A method for demonstrating growth hormone activity in human plasma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 15:537–546

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Segaloff A, Komrad EL, Flores A, Segaloff A, Hardesty M (1955) The growth hormone content of human plasma. Endocrinology 57:527–530

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yalow RS, Berson SA (1959) Assay of plasma insulin in human subjects by immunological methods. Nature 184(Suppl 21):1648–1649

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ehrlich RM, Randle PJ (1961) Immunoassay of growth hormone in human serum. Lancet 2:230–233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schalch DS, Parker ML (1964) A sensitive double antibody immunoassay for human growth hormone in plasma. Nature 203:1141–1142

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Morris HG, Arai Y, Hlad CJ Jr, Tompkins R, Elrick H (1964) Rapid quantitative immunologic assay for human growth hormone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 24:417–424

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Orskov H, Thomsen HG, Yde H (1968) Wick chromatography for rapid and reliable immunoassay of insulin, glucagon and growth hormone. Nature 219:193–195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. van Weemen BK (2005) The rise of EIA/ELISA. Clin Chem 2226

  9. Wu AH (2006) A selected history and future of immunoassay development and applications in clinical chemistry. Clin Chim Acta 369:119–124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kohler G, Milstein C (1975) Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. Nature 256:495–497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dattani MT, Hindmarsh PC, Brook CG, Robinson IC, Weir T, Marshall NJ (1993) Enhancement of growth hormone bioactivity by zinc in the eluted stain assay system. Endocrinology 133:2803–2808

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lesniak MA, Gorden P, Roth J, Gavin JR III (1974) Binding of 125I-human growth hormone to specific receptors in human cultured lymphocytes. Characterization of the interaction and a sensitive radioreceptor assay. J Biol Chem 249:1661–1667

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chapman IM, Hartman ML, Straume M, Johnson ML, Veldhuis JD, Thorner MO (1994) Enhanced sensitivity growth hormone (GH) chemiluminescence assay reveals lower postglucose nadir GH concentrations in men than women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 78:1312–1319

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Popii V, Baumann G (2004) Laboratory measurement of growth hormone. Clin Chim Acta 350:1–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Strasburger CJ, Bidlingmaier M (2005) How robust are laboratory measures of growth hormone status? Horm Res 64(Suppl 2):1–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bidlingmaier F, Geilenkeuser WJ, Kruse R, Rohle G (1991) Our experience with quality control in current growth hormone assays. Horm Res 36(Suppl 1):1–4

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Seth J, Ellis A, Al-Sadie R (1999) Serum growth hormone measurements in clinical practice: an audit of performance from the UK National External Quality Assessment scheme. Horm Res 51:13–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Morsky P, Tiikkainen U, Ruokonen A, Markkanen H (2005) Problematic determination of serum growth hormone: experience from external quality assurance surveys 1998–2003. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 65:377–386

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tanaka T, Tachibana K, Shimatsu A, Katsumata N, Tsushima T, Hizuka N, Fujieda K, Yokoya S, Irie M (2005) A nationwide attempt to standardize growth hormone assays. Horm Res 64(Suppl 2):6–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Celniker AC, Chen AB, Wert RM Jr, Sherman BM (1989) Variability in the quantitation of circulating growth hormone using commercial immunoassays. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 68:469–476

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Granada ML, Sanmarti A, Lucas A, Salinas I, Carrascosa A, Foz M, Audi L (1990) Assay-dependent results of immunoassayable spontaneous 24-hour growth hormone secretion in short children. Acta Paediatr Scand Suppl 370:63–70; discussion 71

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Markkanen H, Pekkarinen T, Valimaki MJ, Alfthan H, Kauppinen-Makelin R, Sane T, Stenman UH (2006) Effect of sex and assay method on serum concentrations of growth hormone in patients with acromegaly and in healthy controls. Clin Chem 52:468–473

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hauffa BP, Lehmann N, Bettendorf M, Mehls O, Dorr HG, Partsch CJ, Schwarz HP, Stahnke N, Steinkamp H, Said E, Sander S, Ranke MB (2004) Central reassessment of GH concentrations measured at local treatment centers in children with impaired growth: consequences for patient management. Eur J Endocrinol 150:291–297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Juul A, Bernasconi S, Clayton PE, Kiess W, DeMuinck-Keizer Schrama S (2002) European audit of current practice in diagnosis and treatment of childhood growth hormone deficiency. Horm Res 58:233–241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wieringa GE, Barth JH, Trainer PJ (2004) Growth hormone assay standardization: a biased view? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 60:538–539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Trainer PJ, Barth J, Sturgeon C, Wieringa G (2006) Consensus statement on the standardisation of GH assays. Eur J Endocrinol 155:1–2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sheppard MC (2007) Growth hormone assay standardization: an important clinical advance. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 66:157–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ekins R (1991) Immunoassay standardization. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl 205:33–46

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Baumann G (1991) Growth hormone heterogeneity: genes, isohormones, variants, and binding proteins. Endocr Rev 12:424–449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Baumann G (1999) Growth hormone heterogeneity in human pituitary and plasma. Horm Res 51:2–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Baumann G, Stolar MW, Buchanan TA (1986) The metabolic clearance, distribution, and degradation of dimeric and monomeric growth hormone (GH): implications for the pattern of circulating GH forms. Endocrinology 119:1497–1501

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Chatelain P, Bouillat B, Cohen R, Sassolas G, Souberbielle JC, Ruitton A, Joly MO, Job JC (1990) Assay of growth hormone levels in human plasma using commercial kits: analysis of some factors influencing the results. Acta Paediatr Scand Suppl 370:56–61; discussion 62

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Reiter EO, Morris AH, MacGillivray MH, Weber D (1988) Variable estimates of serum growth hormone concentrations by different radioassay systems. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 66:68–71

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hayakawa M, Shimazaki Y, Tsushima T, Kato Y, Takano K, Chihara K, Shimatsu A, Irie M (2004) Metabolic effects of 20-kilodalton human growth hormone (20K-hGH) for adults with growth hormone deficiency: results of an exploratory uncontrolled multicenter clinical trial of 20K-hGH. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:1562–1571

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Baumann G (2001) Growth hormone binding protein 2001. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 14:355–375

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Amit T, Youdim MB, Hochberg Z (2000) Clinical review 112: does serum growth hormone (GH) binding protein reflect human GH receptor function? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:927–932

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Jan T, Shaw MA, Baumann G (1991) Effects of growth hormone-binding proteins on serum growth hormone measurements. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 72:387–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ebdrup L, Fisker S, Sorensen HH, Ranke MB, Orskov H (1999) Variety in growth hormone determinations due to use of different immunoassays and to the interference of growth hormone-binding protein. Horm Res 51:20–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Jansson C, Boguszewski C, Rosberg S, Carlsson L, Albertsson-Wikland K (1997) Growth hormone (GH) assays: influence of standard preparations, GH isoforms, assay characteristics, and GH-binding protein. Clin Chem 43:950–956

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Hansen TK, Fisker S, Hansen B, Sorensen HH, Christiansen JS, Jorgensen JO, Orskov H (2002) Impact of GHBP interference on estimates of GH and GH pharmacokinetics. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 57:779–786

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Tsushima T, Katoh Y, Miyachi Y, Chihara K, Teramoto A, Irie M, Hashimoto Y (1999) Serum concentration of 20K human growth hormone (20K hGH) measured by a specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Study Group of 20K hGH. J-Clin-Endocrinol-Metab 84:317–322 issn: 0021-972x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Wu Z, Bidlingmaier M, Dall R, Strasburger CJ (1999) Detection of doping with human growth hormone. LANCET Lancet 353:895

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Boguszewski CL, Boguszewski MC, de Zegher F, Carlsson B, Carlsson LM (2000) Growth hormone isoforms in newborns and postpartum women. Eur J Endocrinol 142:353–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Strasburger CJ, Wu Z, Pflaum CD, Dressendorfer RA (1996) Immunofunctional assay of human growth hormone (hGH) in serum: a possible consensus for quantitative hGH measurement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:2613–2620

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Strasburger C, Barnard G, Toldo L, Zarmi B, Zadik Z, Kowarski A, Kohen F (1989) Somatotropin as measured by a two-site time-resolved immunofluorometric assay [see comments]. Clin Chem 35:913–917

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Stenman UH (2001) Immunoassay standardization: is it possible, who is responsible, who is capable? Clin Chem 47:815–820

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Molitch ME, Clemmons DR, Malozowski S, Merriam GR, Shalet SM, Vance ML, Stephens PA (2006) Evaluation and treatment of adult growth hormone deficiency: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:1621–1634

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Melmed S, Casanueva F, Cavagnini F, Chanson P, Frohman LA, Gaillard R, Ghigo E, Ho K, Jaquet P, Kleinberg D, Lamberts S, Laws E, Lombardi G, Sheppard MC, Thorner M, Vance ML, Wass JA, Giustina A (2005) Consensus statement: medical management of acromegaly. Eur J Endocrinol 153:737–740

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. GH Research Society (2000) Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of growth hormone (GH) deficiency in childhood and adolescence: summary statement of the GH Research Society. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:3990–3993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Growth Hormone Research Society Workshop (1998) Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of adults with growth hormone deficiency: summary statement of the Growth Hormone Research Society Workshop on Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:379–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Freda PU, Nuruzzaman AT, Reyes CM, Sundeen RE, Post KD (2004) Significance of “abnormal” nadir growth hormone levels after oral glucose in postoperative patients with acromegaly in remission with normal insulin-like growth factor-I levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:495–500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Freda PU, Post KD, Powell JS, Wardlaw SL (1998) Evaluation of disease status with sensitive measures of growth hormone secretion in 60 postoperative patients with acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:3808–3816

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Bristow A, Berger P, Bidart JM, Birken S, Norman R, Stenman UH, Sturgeon C (2005) Establishment, value assignment, and characterization of new WHO reference reagents for six molecular forms of human chorionic gonadotropin. Clin Chem 51:177–182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Bidlingmaier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bidlingmaier, M., Strasburger, C.J. Growth hormone assays: current methodologies and their limitations. Pituitary 10, 115–119 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-007-0030-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-007-0030-1

Keywords

Navigation