Skip to main content
Log in

Precis of aboutness

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A lightning fast summary of Yablo, Aboutness, cutting many corners in the interests of brevity. The emphasis is on “ways.” Substituting “ways for S to be true” in for “worlds in which S is true” improves a number of philosophical explanations. The subject matter of S is identified with S’s ways of holding in a world, or failing, as the case may be. S contains T iff T is implied by S, and T’s ways of being true (false) are implied by ways for S to be true (false); this kind of way-implication is the same as subject matter inclusion. S’s surplus content over T is explained as that portion of the content of S that is not about whether T. Subject matter is cast throughout as a full partner in meaning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. “A proposition [already] asserts every proposition which follows from it” (Tractatus, 5.1.24).

  2. Hempel (1960), 465.

  3. The weakest such X is \(E\supset H\). (Bar-Hillel and Carnap (1953), 150.

  4. As Jonathan Schaffer pointed out to me (Yablo 2016).

  5. Lewis (2000).

  6. Vogel (2014).

  7. This is better, but still in the end not quite right.

  8. Fuhrmann (1996).

  9. Goodman (1961), Ullian and Goodman (1977).

  10. Putnam (1958).

  11. Lewis (1988a, b).

References

  • Bar-Hillel, Y., & Carnap, R. (1953). Semantic information. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 4(14), 147–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrmann, A. (1996). An essay on contraction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N. (1961). About. Mind, 70(277), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. G. (1960). Inductive inconsistencies. Synthese, 12(4), 439–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1988a). Relevant implication. Theoria, 54(3), 161–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1988b). Statements partly about observation. In Papers in philosophical logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Lewis, D. (2000). A problem about permission. In Papers in ethics and social philosophy (pp. 163–175). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Putnam, H. (1958). Formalization of the concept “About”. Philosophy of Science, 25(2), 125–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B., & Whitehead, A. N. (1925). Principia mathematica (2nd ed., Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullian, J., & Goodman, N. (1977). Truth about Jones. The Journal of Philosophy, 74(6), 317–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, J. (2014). E&-H. In D. Dodd & E. Zardini (Eds.), Scepticism and perceptual justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yablo, S. (2016). Parts and differences. Philosophical Studies, 173(1), 141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Yablo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yablo, S. Precis of aboutness. Philos Stud 174, 771–777 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0755-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0755-7

Keywords

Navigation