Abstract
We assemble here in this time and place to discuss the thesis that conscious attention can provide knowledge of reference of perceptual demonstratives. I shall focus my commentary on what this claim means, and on the main argument for it found in the first five chapters of Reference and Consciousness. The middle term of that argument is an account of what attention does: what its job or function is. There is much that is admirable in this account, and I am confident that it will be the foundation, the launching-pad, for much future work on the subject. But in the end I will argue that Campbell’s picture makes the mechanisms of attention too smart: smarter than they are, smarter than they could be. If we come to a more realistic appraisal of the skills and capacities of our sub-personal minions, the “knowledge of reference” which they yield will have to be taken down a notch or two.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D. Ballard M.M. Hayhoe P.K. Pook R.P.N. Rao (1997) ArticleTitle‘Deictic Codes for the Embodiment of Cognition’ Behavioral & Brain Sciences 20 IssueID4 723–767
C.D. Broad (1927) Scientific Thought Routledge and Kegan Paul London
J. Campbell (2002) Reference and Consciousness Clarendon Press Oxford
S. Carey F. Xu (2001) ArticleTitle‘Infants’ Knowledge of Objects: Beyond Object Files and Object Tracking’ Cognition 80 179–213 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00154-2
A. Clark (2000) A Theory of Sentience Oxford University Press Oxford
J.J. Gibson (1979) The Ecological Approach to Perception Houghton Mifflin Boston
E. Hirsch (1982) The Concept of Identity Oxford University Press New York
D. Kahneman A. Treisman B.J. Gibbs (1992) ArticleTitle‘The Reviewing of Object Files: Object Specific Interpretation of Information’ Cognitive Psychology 24 IssueID2 175–219 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0010-0285(92)90007-O
N. Kanwisher (2001) ArticleTitle‘Neural Events and Perceptual Awareness’ Cognition 79 89–113 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00125-6
K. Nakayama J.H. Zijiang S. Shimojo (1995) ‘Visual Surface Representation: A Critical Link between Lower-level and Higher-level Vision’ S.M. Kosslyn D.N. Osherson (Eds) Visual Cognition. (Invitation to Cognitive Science, 2nd edn, Vol. 2. General editor Daniel N. Osherson MIT Press Cambridge, Mass 1–70
Z. Pylyshyn (2001) ArticleTitle‘Visual Indexes, Preconceptual Objects, and Situated Vision’ Cognition 80 127–158 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00156-6
A. Treisman (1998) ArticleTitle‘Feature Binding, Attention and Object Perception’ Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B 353 1295–1306 Occurrence Handle10.1098/rstb.1998.0284
J.M. Wolfe S.C. Bennett (1997) ArticleTitle‘Preattentive Object Files: Shapeless Bundles of Basic Features’ Vision Research 37 IssueID1 25–43 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0042-6989(96)00111-3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clark, A. Attention & Inscrutability: A Commentary on John Campbell, Reference and Consciousness for the Pacific APA Meeting, Pasadena, California, 2004. Philos Stud 127, 167–193 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-4940-3
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-4940-3