Abstract
Objective To characterize the communication ritual in the pharmacist–customer dyad during a blood pressure measurement and counselling episode. Setting A Portuguese urban community pharmacy. Method An exploratory, cross-sectional design was used. Participants were purposively selected and data collected via audio recording, as well as demographics and clinical information via questionnaire. Encounters’ verbal content was transcribed verbatim, utterances identified, time stamped, and classified according to a coding scheme of fifteen categories. All data was statistically analyzed using SPSSv17. Main outcome measures Four dialogue structures: speaker turn, interactivity, turn density and turn duration measurements. Results From a total of 51 participants, 72.5% were female with a median age of 66 years. The average systolic blood pressure was 140 mmHg, while the diastolic was 78 mmHg. The blood pressure measurement episode lasted for 5:35 min, with an average of 81 utterances. From all utterances registered, 55.3% were produced by the customer. Visits averaged 38 speaker turns, with an interactivity rate of approximately 7 turns per episode minute. For pharmacists, turn duration averaged 7.0 s and turn density 2.1 utterances. The customers’ turns comprised a mean of 8.0 s, with 2.4 utterances. Longer episodes were related to more speaker turns and greater customer turn density and duration, but lower dialogue interactivity. The interactivity rate was also lower when the customers’ utterances increased. Pharmacists asked more questions (essentially closed ones), while the customers gave more information. No significant associations were observed between elderly/non-elderly and gender in relation to all communication variables. However, an increased number of speaker turns and closed-questions were associated to a higher systolic pressure. Conclusion It seems that pharmacists tend to control the content of the dialogue, while customers have more influence on the visit duration and interactivity. Specific hypertensive episodes induce a higher information search. Since the closed questioning format was prevalent, it seems that open information exchange was limited, mainly serving confirmation purposes rather than having a true exploratory nature. Although talk dominance is balanced, further analysis is required to better inform these results, which would confirm the low interactivity and the reduced information-seeking behaviour showed in the counselling episodes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shah B, Chewning B. Conceptualization and measuring pharmacist-patient communication: a review of published studies. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2006;2:153–85.
Guirguis L, Chewning B. Role theory: literature review and implications for patient-pharmacist interactions. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2005;1:483–507.
West R, Turner L. Introducing communication theory: analysis and application. 2nd ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 2004. ISBN 0-7674-3034-4.
Kairuz T, Bye L, Birdsall R, Deng T, Man L, Ross A, et al. Identifying compliance issues with prescription medicines among older people: a pilot study. Drugs Aging. 2008;25(2):153–62.
Svarstad BL, Bultman DC, Mount JK. Patient counseling provided in community pharmacies: effects of state regulation, pharmacist age, and busyness. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2004;44(1):22–9.
Svarstad BL, Bultman DC, Mount JK, Tabak ER. Evaluation of written prescription information provided in community pharmacies: a study in eight states. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2003;43(3):383–93.
Bradshaw M, Tomany-Korman S, Flores G. Language barriers to prescriptions for patients with limited English proficiency: a survey of pharmacies. Pediatrics. 2007;120(2):225–35.
Roter DL. The Roter Method of Interaction Process Analysis. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins School of Public Health [Online]. 2006 [cited 2009 Apr 10]. Available from: URL: http://www.rias.org/manual.
Montgomery AT, Sporrong SK, Tully MP, Lindblad AK. Follow-up of patients receiving a pharmaceutical care service in Sweden. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2008;33(6):653–62.
Johnson CL, Nicholas A, Divine H, Perrier DG, Blumenschein K, Steinke DT. Outcomes from DiabetesCARE: a pharmacist-provided diabetes management service. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2008;48(6):722–30.
[The changes in Community Pharmacy]. ROF—The Portuguese Pharmaceutical Society Magazine. 2007;80:6–10.
Paoletti V, Raparelli V, Ferroni P, Scarno A, Trinchieri F, Basili S, et al. Arterial hypertension and cardiovascular risk: need for a combined strategy of intervention. Clin Ter. 2008;159(4):269–73.
Leonetti G, Cuspidi C. Recent knowledge on the role of diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients on treatment. Recenti Prog Med. 2008;99(4):191–9.
World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. Pharmacy-based hypertension management model: protocol and guidelines. Copenhagen: WHO; 2005.
Sleath B. Pharmacist question-asking in New Mexico community pharmacies. Am J Pharm Educ. 1995;59:374–9.
Sleath B. Pharmacist-patient relationships: authoritarian, participatory, or default? Patient Educ Couns. 1996;28:253–63.
Fritsch MA, Lamp KC. Low counseling rates in the Kansas City, Missouri, metropolitan area. Ann Pharmacother. 1997;31:985–91.
Kooy MJ, Dessing WS, Kroodsma EF, Smits SR, Fietje EH, Kruijtbosch M, et al. Frequency, nature and determinants of pharmaceutical consultations provided in private by Dutch community pharmacists. Pharm World Sci. 2007;29:81–9.
Roter DL, Larson SM, Beach MC, Cooper LA. Interactive and evaluative correlates of dialogue sequence: a simulation study applying the RIAS to turn taking structures. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;71(1):26–33.
Boardman H, Lewis M, Croft P, Trinder P, Rajaratnam G. Use of community pharmacies: a population-based survey. J Public Health (Oxf). 2005;27(3):254–62.
Tully MP, Temple B. The demographics of pharmacy’s clientele—a descriptive study of the British general public. Int J Pharm Pract. 1999;7:172–81.
Bennett EV, Jones IF. Investigating health information requests in six community pharmacies. Pharm J. 2000;265:R45.
Beers MH, Fletcher AJ, Jones TV, Porter R, Berkwits M, Kaplan JL, editors. The Merck manual of medical information—second home edition. 2nd ed. Whitehouse Station (NJ): Merck Research Laboratories; 2003. ISBN 0-911910-35-2.
Widmaier EP, Raff H, Strang K. Vander, Sherman & Luciano’s human physiology—the mechanisms of body function. 9th ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 2004. p. 394–5. ISBN 0-07-288074-0.
Schommer JC. Patients’ expectations and knowledge of patient counseling services that are available from pharmacists. Am J Pharm Educ. 1997;61:402–6.
Pilnick A. The interactional organization of pharmacist consultations in a hospital setting: a putative structure. J Pragmat. 2001;33:1927–45.
Deveugele M, Derese A, van den Brink-Muinen A, Bensing J, De Maeseneer J. Consultation length in general practice: cross sectional study in six European countries. BMJ. 2002;325(7362):472.
Langewitz W, Nübling M, Weber H. A theory-based approach to analysing conversation sequences. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2003;12(2):103–8.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the community pharmacy ‘Tovar Chaves’ for the collaboration with this study.
Funding
No external sources of funding for this work were obtained.
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cavaco, A.N., Romano, J.P. Exploring pharmacist–customer communication: the established blood pressure measurement episode. Pharm World Sci 32, 601–609 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-010-9413-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-010-9413-x