Skip to main content

Healthcare Conversational Agents: Chatbot for Improving Patient-Reported Outcomes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 661))

Abstract

The patient’s lack of adherence to the doctor’s prescriptions limits the favorable effects that the optimal prescribed treatments have on the disease. Adherence to therapy can be measured by various methods, including self-assessment questionnaires (structured interviews) and electronic devices. The Patient Report Outcomes are derived from the self-assessment questionnaires. When implementing an effective patient-centered care strategy, clinicians must keep track of Patient Report Outcomes over time. The patient-reported outcomes are effective tools to better understand a patient’s health conditions, goals, and specific factors related to his care. Conversational Agents are receiving increasing attention in healthcare and academia, but they are still little used to collect data. This paper describes how a conversational agent can intervene in the collection of data carried out directly by the patient and not by the doctor, using patient-reported outcomes and their electronic version. In the case study, the chatbot created with Dialogflow encourages patients to follow their therapy and report all the treatment’s effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.healthtap.com/.

  2. 2.

    https://www.your.md/.

  3. 3.

    PCORI is the leading founder of patient-centered comparative clinical effectiveness research in the United States.

  4. 4.

    Webhooks are services that host your business logic.

References

  1. Ahmad, N.K., Che, M.H., Zainal, A., Rauf, M.F.A., Adnan, Z.: Review of chatbots design techniques. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 181(8), 7–10 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Austin, E., LeRouge, C., Hartzler, A.L., Chung, A.E., Segal, C., Lavallee, D.C.: Opportunities and challenges to advance the use of electronic patient-reported outcomes in clinical care: a report from amia workshop proceedings. JAMIA Open 2(4), 407–410 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Benson, T., Grieve, G.: Principles of Health Interoperability: SNOMED CT, HL7 and FHIR. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30370-3

  4. Bibault, J.-E., Chaix, B., Nectoux, P., Pienkowski, A., Guillemasé, A., Brouard, B.: Healthcare ex machina: are conversational agents ready for prime time in oncology? Clin. Transl. Radiat. Oncology 16, 55–59 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boyce, M.B., Browne, J.P., Greenhalgh, J.: The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative research. BMJ Qual. Saf. 23(6), 508–518 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheung, Y.T., et al.: The use of patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer care: preliminary insights from a multinational scoping survey of oncology practitioners. Support. Care Cancer 30(2), 1427–1439 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ciani, O., Federici, C.B.: Value lies in the eye of the patients: the why, what, and how of patient-reported outcomes measures. Clin. Therap. 42(1), 25–33 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Eton, D.T., et al.: Harmonizing and consolidating the measurement of patient-reported information at health care institutions: a position statement of the mayo clinic. Pat. Related Outcome Meas. 5, 7 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fadhil, A., Gabrielli, S.: Addressing challenges in promoting healthy lifestyles: the al-chatbot approach. In: Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, pp. 261–265 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jensen, R.E., Gummerson, S.P., Chung, A.E.: Overview of patient-facing systems in patient-reported outcomes collection: focus and design in cancer care. J. Oncol. Pract. 12(10), 873 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jin, J., Sklar, G.E., Oh, V.M.S., Li, S.C.: Factors affecting therapeutic compliance: a review from the patient’s perspective. Therap. Clin. Risk Manag. 4(1), 269 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kadariya, D., Venkataramanan, R., Yip, H.Y., Kalra, M., Thirunarayanan, K., Sheth, A.: KBOT: knowledge-enabled personalized chatbot for asthma self-management. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP), pp. 138–143. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, D.H.: A model for designing healthcare service based on the patient experience. Int. J. Healthcare Manag. 12(3), 180–188 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lucas, G.M., Gratch, J., King, A., Morency, L.P.: It’s only a computer: virtual humans increase willingness to disclose. Comput. Human Behav. 37, 94–100 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nguyen, H., Butow, P., Dhillon, H., Sundaresan, P.: A review of the barriers to using patient-reported outcomes (pros) and patient-reported outcome measures (proms) in routine cancer care. J. Med. Radiat. Sci. 68(2), 186–195 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ni, L., Lu, C., Liu, N., Liu, J.: MANDY: towards a smart primary care chatbot application. In: Chen, J., Theeramunkong, T., Supnithi, T., Tang, X. (eds.) KSS 2017. CCIS, vol. 780, pp. 38–52. Springer, Singapore (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6989-5_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Seitz, L., Bekmeier-Feuerhahn, S., Gohil, K.: Can we trust a chatbot like a physician? a qualitative study on understanding the emergence of trust toward diagnostic chatbots. Int. J. Human-Comput. Stud. 165, 102848 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Snyder, C., Wu, A.W.: Users’ Guide to Integrating Patient-Reported Outcomes in Electronic Health Records. John Hopkins University, Baltimore (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zahour, O., El Habib Benlahmar, A.E., Ouchra, H., Hourrane, O.: Towards a chatbot for educational and vocational guidance in morocco: chatbot e-orientation. Int. J. 9(2) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was partially supported by MIUR (Ministero dell’Istruzione dell’Universitá e della Ricerca) under the national program PON 2014–2020, I.CARE.ME (ID ARS01_00707) research project in the area of digital healthcare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela Peduto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Fenza, G., Orciuoli, F., Peduto, A., Postiglione, A. (2023). Healthcare Conversational Agents: Chatbot for Improving Patient-Reported Outcomes. In: Barolli, L. (eds) Advanced Information Networking and Applications. AINA 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 661. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29056-5_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics