Skip to main content
Log in

Interference from Proteins and Surfactants on Particle Size Distributions Measured by Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA)

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Characterization of submicron protein particles continues to be challenging despite active developments in the field. NTA is a submicron particle enumeration technique, which optically tracks the light scattering signal from suspended particles undergoing Brownian motion. The submicron particle size range NTA can monitor in common protein formulations is not well established. We conducted a comprehensive investigation with several protein formulations along with corresponding placebos using NTA to determine submicron particle size distributions and shed light on potential non-particle origin of size distribution in the range of approximately 50–300 nm.

Methods

NTA and DLS are performed on polystyrene size standards as well as protein and placebo formulations.

Results

Protein formulations filtered through a 20 nm filter, with and without polysorbate-80, show NTA particle counts. As such, particle counts above 20 nm are not expected in these solutions. Several other systems including positive and negative controls were studied using NTA and DLS.

Conclusions

These apparent particles measured by NTA are not observed in DLS measurements and may not correspond to real particles. The intent of this article is to raise awareness about the need to interpret particle counts and size distribution from NTA with caution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CCD:

Charge Coupled Device

DLS:

Dynamic Light Scattering

MFI:

Micro-Flow Imaging

NTA:

Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis

References

  1. Dimitrov DS. Therapeutic proteins. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;899:1–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Das TK. Protein particulate detection issues in biotherapeutics development - current status. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2012;13(2):732–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Joubert MK, Luo Q, Nashed-Samuel Y, Wypych J, Narhi LO. Classification and characterization of therapeutic antibody aggregates. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(28):25118–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Filipe V, Hawe A, Jiskoot W. Critical evaluation of Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA) by nanosight for the measurement of nanoparticles and protein aggregates. Pharm Res. 2010;27(5):796–810.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Barnard JG, Babcock K, Carpenter JF. Characterization and quantitation of aggregates and particles in interferon-β products: potential links between product quality attributes and immunogenicity. J Pharm Sci. 2013;102(3):915–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Surfactant micelle characterization using dynamic light scattering. Zetasizer Nano application note, no. MRKB09-01. Malvern Instruments.

  7. Sigh SK, Afonina N, Awwd M, Bechtold-Peters K, Blue JT, Chou D, et al. An industry perspective on the monitoring of subvisible particles as a quality attribute for protein therapeutics. J Pharm Sci. 2010;99(8):3302–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wright M. Nanoparticle tracking analysis for the multiparameter characterization and counting of nanoparticle suspensions. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;906(6):511–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Saveyn H, De Baets B, Thas O, Hole P, Smith J, Van der Meeren P. Accurate particle size distribution determination by nanoparticle. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2010;352:593–600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Choi I, Lee L. Rapid detection of Aβ aggregation and inhibition by dual functions of gold nanoplasmic particles: catalytic activator and optical reporter. ACS Nano. 2013;23(7):6268–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Torosantucci R, Weinbuch D, Klem R, Jiskoot W. Triethylenetetramine prevents insulin aggregation and fragmentation during copper catalyzed oxidation. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2013;8(3):464–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Song H, Geng H, Ruan J, Wang K, Bao C, Wang J, et al. Development of Polysorbate 80/Phospholipid mixed micellar formation for docetaxel and assessment of its in vivo distribution in animal models. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2011;6(354):1–12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND DISCLOSURES

We thank Dr. Sibylle Herzer and Matthew Conover of Bristol-Myers Squibb Process Development group for help with preparing the nanofiltered samples, and Dr. Reb Russell of New Jersey Biologics Development for encouragement and support. We also thank Dr. Ragy Ragheb and Dr. Jonathan Mehtala of Nanosight (Malvern) for helpful discussions on NTA instrument parameters. We thank an anonymous reviewer for insightful comments during review regarding potential root cause of NTA spurious peaks. The authors declare no personal financial or non-financial conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tapan K. Das.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Figure S1

(PDF 834 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bai, K., Barnett, G.V., Kar, S.R. et al. Interference from Proteins and Surfactants on Particle Size Distributions Measured by Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA). Pharm Res 34, 800–808 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-017-2109-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-017-2109-3

KEY WORDS

Navigation