Skip to main content
Log in

Muslims Love Jesus, Too? Corrective Information Alters Prejudices Against Islam

  • Published:
Pastoral Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study examined whether prejudices towards Islam can be altered through corrective information. A total of 1715 German participants were first asked to appraise their opinions towards Judaism, Christianity and Islam (the ratings pertained to progressiveness, tolerance, peacefulness). Subsequently, questions regarding knowledge about religious topics were posed to participants. Questions were selected to elicit common prejudices pertaining to Islam. The correct answers were then displayed along with detailed explanations. Finally, participants were asked to rate their current opinion towards the three religions once again. Opinions towards Islam were largely negative at baseline but improved significantly after presentation of the correct answers. The present study suggests that prejudices against Islam are partially fueled by knowledge gaps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ABC News/Washington Post Poll (2008). Broad skepticism of Islam marks post-9/11 sentiment. Washington, DC: ABC News/Washington Post.

  • Ajzen, I., Nicholas, J., Sheikh, S., & Gilbert Cote, N. (2011). Knowledge and the prediction of behavior: The role of information accuracy in the theory of planned behavior. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 33, 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, S. S., & Rehman, J. (2005). The concept of Jihad in Islamic international law. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 10, 321–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, A., Brakhw, M. A., Bin Nordin, M. Z. F., & Ismail, S. F. S. (2012). Some linguistic difficulties in translating the holy Quran from Arabic into English. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 2, 588–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aly, A. (2007). Australian Muslim responses to the discourse on terrorism in the Australian popular media. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 42, 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angus Reid Global (2013). Canadians view non-Christian religions with uncertainty, dislike. Vancouver: Angus Reid Global.

  • Arab American Institute (2014). American attitudes toward arabs and muslims. Washington, DC: Arab American Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, D. M., Erdfelder, E., Meltzoff, A. N., Peria, W., & Loftus, G. R. (2011). Hindsight bias from 3 to 95 years of age. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 378–391.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cesari, J. (2010). Islam is a religion, not a terror ideology, CNN.com. http://edition.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/08/24/cesari.islam.is.a.religion/. Accessed 22 Nov 2014.

  • Dunn, K. M. (2005). Australian public knowledge of Islam. Indonesian Journal for Islamic Studies, 12, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, J. S., & Soper, J. C. (2003). The roots of public attitudes toward state accommodation of European Muslims’ religious practices before and after September 11. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 247–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, S. (2014). Fear under construction: Islamophobia within American Christian zionism. Islamophobia Studies Journal, 2, 26–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebauer, J. E., Göritz, A. S., Hofmann, W., & Sedikides, C. (2012). Self-love or other-love? Explicit other-preference but implicit self-preference. PLoS ONE, 7(7), e41789.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • González, K. V., Verkuyten, M., Weesie, J., & Poppe, E. (2008). Prejudice towards Muslims in the Netherlands: Testing integrated threat theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 667–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Göritz, A. S. (2007). Using online panels in psychological research. In A. N. Joinson, K. Y. A. McKenna, T. Postmes, & U.-D. Reips (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of internet psychology (pp. 473–485). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göritz, A. S. (2014). Determinants of the starting rate and the completion rate in online panel studies. In M. Callegaro, R. Baker, J. Bethlehem, A. S. Göritz, J. A. Krosnick, & P. J. Lavrakas (Eds.), Online panel research: A data quality perspective (pp. 154–170). Chichester: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haug, S., Müssig, S., & Stichs, A. (2009). Muslim life in Germany: A study conducted on behalf of the German conference on Islam (Vol. 1). Berlin: Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hervik, P. (2012). The Danish Muhammad cartoon conflict. Malmö: Malmö University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, M. (2000). Islam, media and minorities in Denmark. Current Sociology, 48, 95–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. (2007). Constructing enemies: ‘Islamic Terrorism’ in political and academic discourse. Government and Opposition, 42, 394–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, O., Backstrom, M., & Bjorklund, F. (2013). Bidirectional correction in social judgments: How a cue to the risk of bias causes more favorable ratings of some groups but less favorable of others. Journal of Social Psychology, 153, 131–148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Ilies, R., & Scott, B. A. (2006). Work-family conflict and emotions: Effects at work and at home. Personnel Psychology, 59, 779–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunst, J. R., & Thomsen, L. (2015). Prodigal sons: Dual Abrahamic categorization mediates the detrimental effects of religious fundamentalism on Christian-Muslim relations. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 25, 293–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. A., Gibbons, J. A., Thompson, J. M., & Timani, H. S. (2009). The Islamophobia Scale: Instrument development and initial validation. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 19, 92–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz, S., Andreou, C., Schneider, B. C., Wittekind, C. E., Menon, M., Balzan, R. P., & Woodward, T. S. (2014). Sowing the seeds of doubt: Anarrative review on metacognitive training in schizophrenia. Clinical Psychology Review, 34, 358–366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Open Society Institute (2010). Muslims in Europe. A report on 11 EU cities. New York: Open Society Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panagopoulos, C. (2006). The polls-trends: Arab and Muslim Americans and Islam in the aftermath of 9/11. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 608–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J., Felix, K., & Lee, G. (2007). Implicit attitudes toward Arab-Muslims and the moderating effects of social information. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center (2003). Religion and politics: Contention and consensus. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center (2014). How Americans feel about religious groups—Jews, Catholics & Evangelicals rated warmly, atheists and Muslims more coldly. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piccolo, R. F., & Colquitt, J. A. (2006). Transformational leadership and job behaviors: The mediating role of core job characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 327–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitz, G. (1969). An inertia effect (resistance to change) in the revision of opinion. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 23, 24–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, R. F. (2004). Hindsight bias. In R. F. Pohl (Ed.), Cognitive illusions: A handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking, judgement and memory (pp. 363–378). Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, S. (2010). Wahrnehmung und Akzeptanz religiöser Vielfalt [Perception and acceptance of religious diversity]. Münster: Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowatt, W. C., Franklin, L. M., & Cotton, M. (2005). Patterns and personality correlates of implicit and explicit attitudes toward Christians and Muslims. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44, 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, T. M. (2004). Europe and Islam: Crescent waxing, cultures clashing. Washington Quarterly, 27, 25–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, J., Fincke, G., & Will, A.-K. (2013). Muslime in der Mehrheitsgesellschaft: Medienbild und Alltagserfahrungen in Deutschland [Muslims in the majority society: Reflection in the media and everyday experiences in Germany]. Berlin: Sachverständigenrat deutscher Stiftungen für Integration und Migration (SVR) GmbH.

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zdanowski, J. (2008). Christianity and Islam. Focus on Oriental Studies, 17, 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steffen Moritz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moritz, S., Göritz, A.S., Kühn, S. et al. Muslims Love Jesus, Too? Corrective Information Alters Prejudices Against Islam. Pastoral Psychol 66, 65–77 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-016-0706-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-016-0706-4

Keywords

Navigation