Abstract
In recent years there have been a number of highly publicized episodes of large international capital flow surges and dramatic reversals. This paper addresses several issues surrounding such episodes. We investigate how frequent are capital surges and have they been increasing over time. This requires dealing with the issue of how capital flow surges are measured. In our review of recent studies we found that a wide variety of measures have been used and that most studies have paid little attention to the measures used in other studies. To examine how much the identification of surge episodes varied according to the different measures, we selected seven measures from the recent literature and applied them on a common dataset of 46 countries for the period 1980 to 2010. The differences in the numbers of episodes identified by the various methods were far from trivial. In fact they varied by a factor of almost three. However, across most measures, we found that there was a substantial increase in surges from the 1980s period to 1990s. Whether there was a further increase during the 2000s varied by the measure used. These findings highlight a need to devote more attention to how surges may best be measured.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Reinhart and Reinhart (2008) refer to these as capital flow bonanzas.
A recent study by Molnar et al. (2013) that only came to our attention after this paper was substantially completed uses a measurement that compares the size of countries’ inflows with group inflows rather than just its own history
An alternative to filtering is using a moving average. One obvious difference between these two techniques is related to the weights assigned to the data. In contrast to moving average technique that assigns an equal weight to any observation periods, the HP Filter assigns different weights to different observation periods based on data frequency.
Drehmann et al. (2011) has also utilized quarterly data, which will be helpful for future studies to develop finer grained picture of surges and reversals.
The entire country list is given in Appendix 1
Calvo (1998) uses changes in the current account and international reverses. While this is a less direct measure it allows him to use monthly data, whereas direct data on capital flows are usually quarterly or annual. A major disadvantage is that this measure only captures net flows.
It should be explained that the standard terminology can be somewhat misleading. Gross flows separate out the behavior of domestic and foreign investors but the data for each is available only on net bases, i.e., total assets and total liabilities.
Although theoretically it is possible to have an increasing ratio while inflows were actually decreasing, our sample indicates out of 622 cases only three of them related to this case.
See Sula (2010) for a more compact version of this study.
The rationale for not using a single year lag is that the capital inflows may increase suddenly in 1 year and continue to be very high for consecutive years without another abrupt increase. In such a case, if the surge is defined as a 1-year difference in capital inflows, the measure will only detect the beginning of the surge but will miss the continuation. The second criterion ensures that the level of inflows is large enough relative to GDP. This condition allows for filtering out the episodes of sudden capital flow recoveries from previous large outflows to small inflows in the current year.
See Appendix B for the details
Using different methods Agosin and Huaita (2011) also find increasing probability of reversals as surge lengths increase.
The correlation between measures of currency crises and capital flow reversals is much lower that one might expect, see Efremidze et al. (2011).
References
Agosin MR, Huaita F (2011) Capital flows to emerging economies: Minsky in the tropics. Cambridge J Econ 35:663–683
Agosin MR, Huaita F (2012) Overreaction in capital flows to emerging markets: booms and sudden stops. J Int Money Financ 31:1140–1155
Balakrishnan R, Nowak S, Panth S, Wu Y (2013) Surging capital flows to emerging Asia: facts, impacts and responses. J Intl Econ Comm Policy. doi:10.1142/S1793993313500075
Bluedorn JC, Duttagupta R, Guajardo J, Topalova P (2013) Capital flows are fickle: Anytime, Anywhere. IMF Working Paper13/183
Caballero J (2012) Do surges in international capital inflows influence the likelihood of banking crises? IDB Working Paper 305
Calderón C, Kubota M (2013) Sudden stops: are global and local investors alike? J Int Econ 89:122–142
Calvo GA (1998) Capital flows and capital-market crises: the simple economics of sudden stops. J Appl Econ 1:35–54
Cardarelli R, Elekdag S, Kose MA (2010) Capital inflows: macroeconomic implications and policy responses. Econ Syst 34:333–356
Cavallo EA, Frankel JA (2008) Does openness to trade make countries more vulnerable to sudden stops, or less? using gravity to establish causality. J Int Money Financ 27:1430–1452
Cavallo EA, Powell A, Pedemonte M, Tavella P (2013) A New Taxonomy of Sudden Stops: Which Sudden Stops Should Countries Be Most Concerned About? (No. IDB-WP-430). IDB Working Paper Series
Drehmann M, Borio CE, Tsatsaronis K (2011) Anchoring countercyclical capital buffers: the role of credit aggregates. Bank for International Settlements, Monetary and Economics Department
Edwards S (2007) Capital controls and capital flows in emerging economies: Policies, practices, and consequences. National Bureau of Economic Research Conference Report; Chicago and London; University of Chicago Press
Efremidze L, Schreyer SM, Sula O (2011) Sudden stops and currency crises. J Financ Econ Policy 3:304–321
Forbes KJ, Warnock FE (2012) Capital flow waves: surges, stops, flight, and retrenchment. J Int Econ 88:235–251
Furceri D, Guichard S, Rusticelli E (2012) Episodes of large capital inflows, banking and currency crises, and sudden stops. Int Financ 15:1–35
Ghosh AR, Qureshi MS, Kim JI, Zalduendo J (2014) Surges J Int Econ 92:266–285
Gourinchas P, Valdes R, Landerretche O (2001) Lending Booms: Latin America and the World, NBER Working Paper, No 8249
Harvey A, Trimbur T (2008) Trend estimation and the hodrick-prescott filter. J Jpn Stat Soc 38:41–49
Hodrick RJ, Prescott EC (1997) Postwar US business cycles: an empirical investigation. J Money Credit Bank 29:1–16
Janus T, Riera-Crichton D (2013) International gross capital flows: new uses of balance of payments data and application to financial crises. J Policy Model 35:16–28
Kim S (2013) Capital flow surges and reversals. Dissertation, Claremont Graduate University
Kim S, Efremidze L, Sula O, Willett T (2014) The relationships among capital flow surges, reversals and sudden stops, Claremont Institute for Economic Policy Studies (CIEP) Working Paper
Molnar M, Tateno Y, Supornsinchai A (2013) Capital flows in Asia-Pacific Controls, Bonanzas and Sudden Stops, OECD Development Center Working Paper, No 320
Powell AP, Tavella P (2012) Capital Inflow Surges in Emerging Economies: How Worried should LAC be? IDB Publications (Working Papers) 76956, Inter-American Development Bank
Ravn MO, Uhlig H (2002) On adjusting the hodrick-prescott filter for the frequency of observations. Rev Econ Stat 84:371–376
Reinhart CM, Reinhart VR (2008) Capital flow bonanzas: An encompassing view of the past and present. NBER Working Paper, No w14321
Rothenberg AD, Warnock FE (2011) Sudden flight and true sudden stops. Rev Econ Stat 19:509–524
Sula O (2006) The behavior of international capital flows to emerging markets. Dissertation, Claremont Graduate University
Sula O (2010) Surges and sudden stops of capital flows to emerging markets. Open Econ Rev 21:589–605
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendices
1.1 Appendix 1
1.2 Appendix 2 Correlations among Surge Methods
1.3 Appendix 3
1.4 Appendix 4
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Crystallin, M., Efremidze, L., Kim, S. et al. How Common are Capital Flows Surges? How They are Measured Matters -a Lot. Open Econ Rev 26, 663–682 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-015-9342-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-015-9342-3