Date: 23 May 2012
Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Most policy-relevant work on climate change in the social sciences either analyzes costs and benefits of particular policy options against important but often narrow sets of objectives or attempts to explain past successes or failures. We argue that an “applied forward reasoning” approach is better suited for social scientists seeking to address climate change, which we characterize as a “super wicked” problem comprising four key features: time is running out; those who cause the problem also seek to provide a solution; the central authority needed to address it is weak or non-existent; and, partly as a result, policy responses discount the future irrationally. These four features combine to create a policy-making “tragedy” where traditional analytical techniques are ill equipped to identify solutions, even when it is well recognized that actions must take place soon to avoid catastrophic future impacts. To overcome this tragedy, greater attention must be given to the generation of path-dependent policy interventions that can “constrain our future collective selves.” Three diagnostic questions result that orient policy analysis toward understanding how to trigger sticky interventions that, through progressive incremental trajectories, entrench support over time while expanding the populations they cover. Drawing especially from the literature on path dependency, but inverting it to develop policy responses going forward, we illustrate the plausibility of our framework for identifying new areas of research and new ways to think about policy interventions to address super wicked problems.
Authors contributed equally but are listed in reverse alphabetical order.
Ackerman, F., & Heinzerling, L. (2004). Priceless: On knowing the price of everything and the value of nothing. New York: The New Press.
Ainslie, G. W. (2001). Breakdown of will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Arrow, K. J., Cropper, M. L., Eads, G. C., Hahn, R. W., Lave, L. B., Noll, R. G., et al. (1996). Is there a role for benefit-cost analysis in environmental, health, and safety regulation? Science, 272, 221–222.CrossRef
Arthur, W. B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal, 99(394), 116–131.CrossRef
Ascher, W. (2009). Bringing in the future: Strategies for farsightedness and sustainability in developing countries. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Barkin, J. S. (2006). Discounting the discount rate: Ecocentrism and environmental economics. Global Environmental Politics, 6(4), 56–72.CrossRef
Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bernstein, S., Lebow, R. N., Stein, J. G., & Weber, S. (2000). God gave physics the easy problems: Adapting social science to an unpredictable world. European Journal of International Relations, 6(1), 43–76.CrossRef
Betsill, M. M., & Hoffmann M. J. (2009). Constructing “Cap and Trade”: The evolution of emissions trading systems for greenhouse gases. Paper read at Paper prepared for the 2009 Open meeting of the human dimensions of global environmental change research community, at Bonn, Germany.
Beyer, J. (2005). Not all path dependence is alike—A critique of the “implicit conservatism” of a common concept. Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie, 34(1), 5–21.CrossRef
Bigelow, J. (1982). A catastrophe model of organizational-change. Behavioral Science, 27(1), 26–42.CrossRef
California Air Resources Board. (2011). Proposed adaptive management plan for the cap-and-trade regulation. Sacremento: California Environmental Protection Agency.
Campagnolo, I. (2007). Speech from the Throne delivered by The Honourable Iona Campagnolo, Lieutenant Governor, on the occasion of the opening of the third session, thirty-eighth parliament. Government of British Columbia, February 13 2007 [cited April 10 2010]. Available from http://www.leg.bc.ca/38th3rd/4-8-38-3.htm.
Cashore, B., & Howlett, M. (2007). Punctuating which equilibrium? Understanding thermostatic policy dynamics in Pacific Northwest forest. American Journal of Political Science, 51(3), 532–551.CrossRef
Clemens, E. S., & Cook, J. M. (1999). Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 441–466.CrossRef
Cowan, R. (1990). Nuclear-power reactors—A study in technological lock-in. Journal of Economic History, 50(3), 541–567.CrossRef
David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review, 75(2), 332–337.
DeSombre, E. R. (2000). Domestic sources of international environmental policy: Industry, environmentalists, and US power, American and comparative environmental policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Durrant, R. F., & Diehl, P. F. (1989). Agendas, alternatives, and public policy: Lessons from the US foreign policy arena. Journal of Public Policy, 9, 179–205.CrossRef
Elster, J. (2000). Ulysses unbound: Studies in rationality, precommitment, and constraints. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Elster, J. (2002). Don’t burn your bridge before you come to it: Some ambiguities and complexities of precommitment. Texas Law Review, 81, 1751.
Environmental Protection Agency. (2007). Individual Emissions.
Ertman, T. (1997). Birth of the leviathan: Building states and regimes in medieval and early modern Europe. Cambridge, [Eng.]; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Esty, D. C. (1994). Greening the GATT: Trade, environment, and the future (Vol. 16). Washington DC: Institute for International Economics.
Frame, B., & Brown, J. (2008). Developing post-normal technologies for sustainability. Ecological Economics, 65(2), 225–241.
Griffin, L. J. (1993). Narrative, event-structure analysis, and causal interpretation in historical sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 98(5), 1094–1133.CrossRef
Gunningham, N., & Sinclair, D. (1999). Integrative regulation: A principle-based approach to environmental policy. Law & Social Inquiry, 24(4), 853–896.CrossRef
Hacker, J. S. (1998). The historical logic of national health insurance: Structure and sequence in the development of British, Canadian, and US medical policy. Studies in American Political Development, 12(1), 57–130.CrossRef
Hacker, J. S. (2002). The divided welfare state: The battle over public and private social benefits in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hall, P. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning and the state: The case of economic policy making and Britain. Comparative Politics, 25, 275–296.CrossRef
Hall, P. (2003). Aligning ontology and methodology in comparative politics. In J. Mahoney & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hansen, J. (2006). Our planet’s keeper. New York: Review of Books.
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.
Harrison, K. (2009). A tale of two taxes: The fate of environmental tax reform in Canada and the province of British Columbia. Toronto, Canada: In American Political Science Association.
Herbig, P. A. (1991). A cusp catastrophe model of the adoption of an industrial innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 8(2), 127–137.CrossRef
Hoffman, A. J. (2011). Talking past each other? Cultural framing of skeptical and convinced logics in the climate change debate. Organization & Environment, 24(1), 3–33.CrossRef
Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (1995). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems. New York: Oxford University Press.
IEA. (2011). Prospect of limiting the global increase in temperature to 2°C is getting bleaker. International Energy Agency 2011 [cited June 2011]. Available from http://www.iea.org/index_info.asp?id=1959.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2007). Summary for policymakers. In S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt, M. Tignor, & H. L. Miller (Eds.), Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Islas, J. (1997). Getting round the lock-in in electricity generating systems: The example of the gas turbine. Research Policy, 26(1), 49–66.CrossRef
Karp, L. (2005). Global warming and hyperbolic discounting. Journal of Public Economics, 89(2–3), 261–282.CrossRef
Kemp, R., Rip, A., & Schot, J. (2001). Constructing transition paths through the management of niches. In R. Garud & P. Karnoe (Eds.), Path dependence and creation. Mahwah, New Jersey and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.
Kysar, D. A. (2010). Regulating from nowhere: Environmental law and the search for objectivity. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lasswell, H. D. (1956). The decision process: Seven categories of functional analysis. College Park: Bureau of Governmental Research, University of Maryland Press.
Lazarus, R. J. (2009). Super wicked problems and climate change: Restraining the present to liberate the future. Cornell Law Review, 94, 1153–1234.
Levi, M. (1997). A model, a method and a map: Rational choice in comparative historical analysis. In M. I. Lichbach & A. S. Zuckerman (Eds.), Comparative politics: Rationality, culture and structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2007). Playing it forward: Path dependency, progressive incrementalism, and the “super wicked” problem of global climate change. Paper presented at International studies association convention, Chicago, Il, February 28th–March 3.Lindblom, C. E. 1959. The Science of Muddling Through. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88.
Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88.
Mahoney, J. (2000). Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society, 29, 507–548.CrossRef
Maioni, A. (1999). Parting at the crossroads: The emergence of health insurance in the United States and Canada. New York: Princeton University Press.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1996). Institutional perspectives on political institutions. Governance, 9(3), 247–264.CrossRef
Maréchal, K. (2010). Not irrational but habitual: The importance of “behavioural lock-in” in energy consumption. Ecological Economics, 69(5), 1104–1114.
Maréchal, K., & Lazaric, N. (2010). Overcoming inertia: insights from evolutionary economics into improved energy and climate policies. Climate Policy, 10(1), 103–119.
Marmor, T. (2007). Universal health insurance 2007: Can we learn from the past? Dissent. (Summer 2007).
Mayhew, D. R. (2002). Electoral realignments: A critique of an American genre, The Yale ISPS series. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Meckling, J. (2011). Carbon coalitions: Business, climate politics, and the rise of emissions trading. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Ministry of Small Business and Revenue. (2008). British Columbia carbon tax. Government of British Columbia, February 2008 [cited April 10 2010]. Available from http://www.sbr.gov.bc.ca/documents_library/notices/British_Columbia_Carbon_Tax.pdf.
Mintzberg, H. (1978). Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science, 24(9), 934–948.
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Evolutionary theorizing in economics. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16, 23–46.
Newell, P., & Paterson, M. (2010). Climate capitalism: Global warming and the transformation of the global economy. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nordhaus, W. D. (2007). To tax or not to tax: Alternative approaches to slowing global warming. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1(1), 26–44.CrossRef
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Page, S. E. (2006). Path dependence. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 1, 87–115.CrossRef
Pal, L. A. (2000). Beyond policy analysis: Public issue management in turbulent times. Scarborough, ON: ITP Nelson.
Paterson, M. (2012). Who and what are carbon markets for? Politics and the development of climate policy. Climate Policy, 12(1), 82–97.CrossRef
Patomäki, H. (2006). Realist ontology for future studies. Journal of Critical Realism, 5(1), 1–31.CrossRef
Pegg, J. R. (2002). US Automakers trail Japanese in eco-ranking. Environmental News Service.
Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time: History, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton, N.J.; Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Rabe, B. G. (2009a). The aversion to direct cost-imposition: Selecting climate policy tools in the United States. Paper read at annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 3–6, at Toronto.
Rabe, B. G. (2009b). The ‘impossible dream’ of carbon taxes: Is the “best answer” a political non-starter? In B. G. Rabe (Ed.), Greenhouse governance: Addressing climate change policy in the United States. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Rabin, M. (1998). Psychology and economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1), 11–46.
Raskin, P., Gallopin, G., Gutman, P., Hammond, A., & Swart, R. (1998). Bending the curve: Toward global sustainability. Stockholm, Sweden: The Stockholm Environment Institute.
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.CrossRef
Sabatier, P. A. (1998). Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy, 6(1), 21–48.CrossRef
Sen, A. K. (1977). Rational fools—Critique of behavioral foundations of economic-theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 6(4), 317–344.
Simon, H. A. (1957a). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization. New York: MacMillan.
Simon, H. A. (1957b). Models of man, social and rational: Mathematical essays on rational human behavior in a social setting. New York: Wiley.
Sinden, A., Kysar, D. A., & Driesen, D. M. (2009). Cost–benefit analysis: New foundations on Shifting Sand. Regulation & Governance, 3, 48–71.CrossRef
Strotz, R. H. (1955). Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. The Review of Economic Studies, 23(3), 165–180.CrossRef
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Thelen, K. (2003). How institutions evolve: Insights from comparative historical analysis. In J. Mahoney & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tribe, L. H. (1972). Policy science: Analysis or ideology. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 2, 66–110.
Tuohy, C. H. (1999). Accidental logics: The dynamics of change in the health care arena in the United States, Britain, and Canada. New York: Oxford University Press.
UNEP. (2011). Bridging the emissions gap: A UNEP synthesis report. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.
UNFCCC. (2011). Report of the conference of the parties on its sixteenth session, held in Cancun from 29 November to 10 December 2010. Bonn, Germany: UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Unruh, G. C. (2000). Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 28(12), 817–830.CrossRef
Unruh, G. C. (2002). Escaping carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 30(4), 317–325.CrossRef
Verba, S. (1971). Sequence and development. In L. Binder (Ed.), Crises and sequences in political development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Vogel, D. (1995). Trading up: Consumer and environmental regulation in a global economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Walz, R. (2007). The role of regulation for sustainable infrastructure innovations: The case of wind energy. International Journal of Public Policy, 2(1), 57–88.CrossRef
Weaver, R. K., & Rockman, B. A. (Eds.). (1993). Do institutions matter? (Vol. 1). Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
Webster, M. (2008). Incorporating path dependency into decision-analytic methods: An application to global climate-change policy. Decision Analysis, 5(2), 60–75.CrossRef
Weimer, D. L., & Vining, A. R. (2004). Policy analysis: Concepts and practice (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
- Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change
Volume 45, Issue 2 , pp 123-152
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Wicked problems
- Super wicked problems
- Climate change
- Policy analysis
- Environmental governance
- Path dependency
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Climate and Energy Program, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC, USA
- 2. School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
- 3. Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- 4. School of Public Policy and Administration, Carleton University, 1005 Dunton Tower, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6, Canada