Skip to main content
Log in

Multicast scheduling for stereoscopic video in wireless networks

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stereoscopic video multicast over wireless network is a challenging issue due to large bandwidth requirement, limited resource, and heterogeneous user channel conditions. Recently, most existing methods for stereoscopic video multicast employ symmetric video coding that transmits the same video quality for stereo views. In this paper, we propose a novel rate scheduling method for stereoscopic video multicast in WiFi networks through asymmetric video coding to maximize users’ perceived video quality. We first formulated rate scheduling problem which has complexity in non-polynomial time subjected to playback time limit, block dependency, and the ratio of asymmetric video quality for stereo views. Then, a novel algorithm is proposed to assign a suitable rate for each frame per layer. Furthermore, we studied the impact of block dependency and asymmetric coding. Experimental results confirm that our approach resulted in promising perceived video quality while outperforming several existing video multicast techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note that rate refers to the data transmission rate in Wi-Fi networks.

References

  1. Asher H (1953) Suppression theory of binocular vision. Br J Ophthalmol 37:37–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Choupani R, Wong S, Tolun M (2014) Multiple description coding for SNR scalable video transmission over unreliable networks. Multimedia Tools and Applications 69:843–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Deb S, Jaiswal S, Nagaraj K (2008) Real-time video multicast in WiMAX networks. In: IEEE conference on computer communications (Infocom). Phoenix, pp 1579–1587

  4. Ekmekcioglu E, Gunel B, Dissanayake M, Worrall ST, Kondoz AM (2010) A scalable multi-view audiovisual entertainment framework with content-aware distribution. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on image processing (ICIP). Hong Kong, pp 2401–2404

  5. Fez I, Gil M, Fons J, Guerri JC, Pelechano V (2014) A personalized system for scalable distribution of multimedia content in multicast wireless networks. Multimedia Tools Appl. doi:10.1007/s11042-014-2139-3

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hua S, Chen Z, Guo Y, Liu Y, Liu H, Panwar SP (2011) Scalable video multicast in hybrid 3G/ad-hoc networks. IEEE Trans Multimedia 13:402–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jakubczak S, Katabi D (2011) A cross-layer design for scalable mobile video. In: ACM Proceedings of the 17th annual international conference on mobile computing and networking (MobiCom). Las Vegas, pp 289–300

  8. Kordelas A, Politis I, Dagiuklas T (2015) Transport analysis and quality evaluation of MVC video streaming. Multimedia Tools and Applications. doi:10.1007/s11042-015-2530-8

  9. Lee I, Guan L (2011) Inter-frame dependency in multiview multi-description video streaming. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 3:87–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee HJ, Lee W, Kim S, Noh M (2014) A revised cache allocation algorithm for VoD multicast service. Multimedia Tools Appl. doi:10.1007/s11042-014-2243-4

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee JS, Simone FD, Ebrahimi T (2011) Subjective quality evaluation via paired comparison: application to scalable video coding. IEEE Trans Multimedia 13:882–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li W (1992) Random texts exhibit zipf’s-law-like word frequency distribution. IEEE Trans Information Theory 38:1842–1845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lim W, Kim D, Suh Y (2012) Design of efficient multicast protocol for IEEE 802.11n WLANs and cross-layer optimization for scalable video streaming. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 11:780– 792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin KC-J, Shen W-L, Hsu C-C, Chou C-F (2013) Quality-differentiated video multicast in multirate wireless networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 12:21–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Minoli D (2012) 3DTV Content capture, encoding, and transmission. Wiley

  16. Ozbek N, Tekalp AM (2008) Unequal inter-view rate allocation using scalable stereo video coding and an Objective stereo video quality measure. In: IEEE international conference on multimedia and expo (ICME). Hannover, pp 1113–1116

  17. Rappaport T (2010) Wireless Communications: Principles And Practice, 2/E. Pearson Education

  18. Saygili G, Gurler CG, Tekalp AM (2009) 3D display dependent quality evaluation and rate allocation using scalable video coding. In: IEEE international conference on image processing (ICIP). Cairo, pp 717–720

  19. Saygili G, Gurler CG, Tekalp AM (2011) Evaluation of asymmetric stereo video coding and rate scaling for adaptive 3D video streaming. IEEE Trans Broadcast 57:593–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schwarz H, Marpe D, Wiegand T (2007) Overview of the scalable video coding extension of the H.264/AVC standard. IEEE Trans Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 17:1457– 1461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Scierl T, Stockhammer T, Wiegand T (2007) Mobile video transmission using scalable video coding. IEEE Trans Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 17:1204–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shao F, Jiang G, Yu M, Chen K, Ho YS (2010) Stereoscopic video coding with asymmetric luminance and chrominance qualities. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 56:2460–2468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shao F, Jiang G, Yu M, Chen K, Ho YS (2012) Asymmetric coding of multi-View video plus depth based 3-D video for view rendering. IEEE Trans Multimedia 14:157–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shao F, Jiang G, Yu M, Zheng Q, Chen K (2011) A novel rate control technique for asymmetric-quality stereoscopic video. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 57:1823–1829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Stelmach L, Tam WJ, Meegan D, Vincent A (2000) Stereo image quality: effects of mixed spatio-temporal resolution. IEEE Trans Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 10:188–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vetro A, Wiegand T, Sullivan GJ (2011) Overview of the stereo and multiview video coding extensions of the H.264/AVC standard. In: Proceedings of the IEEE special issue on 3D media and displays, vol 99, pp 626–642

  27. Villalon J, Cuenca P, Orozco-Barbosa L, Seok Y, Turletti T (2007) Cross-layer architecture for adaptive video multicast streaming over multirate wireless LANs. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 25:699–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang K, Barkowsky M, Brunnstrm K, Cousseau R, Callet PL (2012) Perceived 3D TV transmission quality assessment: multi-laboratory results using absolute category rating on quality of experience scale. IEEE Trans Broadcast 58:544–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhuo Y, Hou C, Xiang W, Wu F (2011) Channel distortion modeling for multi-view video transmission over packet-switched networks. IEEE Trans Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 21:1679–1692

  30. Zou J, Jiang L, Li C (2014) Content-aware optimization on rate-distortion and network traffic for scalable video multicast networks. Multimedia Tools Appl 71:1975–1998. doi:10.1007/s11042-012-1321-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Proakis JG, Salehi M (2008) Digital communications. McGraw-Hill

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kai-Lung Hua.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hua, KL., Anistyasari, Y., Hsu, CH. et al. Multicast scheduling for stereoscopic video in wireless networks. Multimed Tools Appl 76, 679–706 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-3045-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-3045-z

Keywords

Navigation