Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

“I have paid my dues”: When physical pain reduces interpersonal justice motivations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study we show that experiencing physical pain interacts with justice related cognition and serves to reduce justice-restoring behavior in the context of interpersonal moral transgressions. This is because concepts of punishment and justice are embodied within the experience of pain, allowing for a sense of atonement from one’s wrongdoings. Two thirds of the participants were induced to feel that their performance in a two player game was unfair. Half of those participants were then asked to engage in a physically painful task, and were afterwards less likely to make amends for past poor performance compared to players who completed a similar, but non-painful task. This effect was only evident for participants who are particularly sensitive to personal injustices and therefore sensitive to the justice restoring qualities of pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The performance task was pretested to ensure that the bogus-feedback was believable. The letters were only briefly presented, and during that brief moment participants were focused on the keyboard to search for the correct key, therefore, it was difficult to determine whether one had hit the correct key on time or not. This made the (difference in) bogus-feedback believable.

  2. Other measures included in the questionnaire-packet focused on bodily sensitivity, i.e., the private body consciousness subscale of the self-consciousness inventory (Fenigstein et al. 1975) and the Highly Sensitive Person Scale (HSPS; Aron and Aron 1997), also the Just World-Scale (Rubin and Peplau 1975) was included. We did not have clear hypotheses about these measures, nor were these measures relevant for the hypotheses underlying the present study.

  3. This cooks distance was calculated from regressing the interaction term onto the dependent variable. When this case was included the interaction effect of justice sensitivity and condition in predicting reparation behavior was not significant (β = −35, p = .11).

References

  • Adams, J. S. (1963). Towards an understanding of inequity. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, E. N., & Aron, A. (1997). Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 345–368.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bastian, B., Jetten, J., & Fasoli, F. (2011). Cleansing the soul by hurting the flesh: The guilt reducing effect of pain. Psychological Science, 22, 334–335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bastian, B., Jetten, J., & Stewart, E. (2013). Physical pain and guilty pleasures. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 215–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). Guilt: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 243–267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caplovitz-Barrett, K. (1995). A functionalist approach to shame and guilt. In J. P. Tangney & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride (pp. 25–63). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craft, L. L., & Landers, D. M. (1998). The effect of exercise on clinical depression and depression resulting from mental illness: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 20, 339–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J. M., & Pittman, T. S. (2003). The psychology of compensatory and retributive justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 324–336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Hooge, I. E., Nelissen, R. M. A., Breugelmans, S. M., & Zeelenberg, M. (2011). What is moral about guilt? Acting prosocially at the disadvantage of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 462–473. doi:10.1037/a0021459.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Hooge, I. E., Zeelenberg, M., & Breugelmans, S. M. (2007). Moral sentiments and cooperation: Differential influences of shame and guilt. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 1025–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M., & Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 522–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1916/1957). Some character-types met with in psycho-analytic work. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard ed. of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 14, pp. 309–336). London: Hogarth Press.

  • Inbar, Y., Pizzaro, D. A., Gilovich, T., & Ariely, D. (2013). Moral masochism: On the connection between guilt and self-punishment. Emotion, 13, 14–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mohiyeddini, C., & Schmitt, M. J. (1997). Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to unfair treatment in a laboratory situation. Social Justice Research, 10, 333–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelissen, R. M. A. (2012). Guilt induced self-punishment as a sign of remorse. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 3, 139–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelissen, R. M. A., & Zeelenberg, M. (2009). When guilt evokes selfpunishment: Evidence for the existence of a Dobby Effect. Emotion, 9, 118–122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L. A. (1975). Who believes in a just world? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 65–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, M., & Dörfel, M. (1999). Procedural injustice at work, justice sensitivity, job satisfaction and psychosomatic well-being. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 443–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, M., Gollwitzer, M., Maes, J., & Arbach, D. (2005). Justice sensitivity: Assessment and location in the personality space. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 202–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, M. J., & Mohiyeddini, C. (1996). Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to a real-life disadvantage. Social Justice Research, 9, 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, M., Neumann, R., & Montada, L. (1995). Dispositional sensitivity to befallen justice. Social Justice Research, 8, 385–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. Oxford: Appleton-Century.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. L. (2002). Shame and guilt. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. E., Huang, J. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2009). The scaffolded mind: Higher mental processes are grounded in early experience of the physical world. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 1257–1267.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, D., & Baker, C. (1988). Pain in children: Comparison of assessment scales. Pediatric Nursing, 14, 9–17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisanne van Bunderen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Bunderen, L., Bastian, B. “I have paid my dues”: When physical pain reduces interpersonal justice motivations. Motiv Emot 38, 540–546 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9403-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9403-8

Keywords

Navigation