Abstract
Self-Determination Theory (Deci and Ryan in Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press, New York, 1985) suggests that certain experiences, such as competence, are equally beneficial to everyone’s well-being (universal hypothesis), whereas Motive Disposition Theory (McClelland in Human motivation. Scott, Foresman, Glenview, IL, 1985) predicts that some people, such as those with a high achievement motive, should benefit particularly from such experiences (matching hypothesis). Existing research on motives as moderators of the relationship between basic need satisfaction and positive outcomes supports both these seemingly inconsistent views. Focusing on the achievement motive, we sought to resolve this inconsistency by considering the specificity of the outcome variables. When predicting domain-specific well-being and flow, the achievement motive should interact with felt competence. However, when it comes to predicting general well-being and flow, felt competence should unfold its effects without being moderated by the achievement motive. Two studies confirmed these assumptions indicating that the universal and matching hypotheses are complementary rather than mutually exclusive.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
McAdams (1980) distinguished between the intimacy motive and the affiliation motive. The former is characterized by the desire for experiences of warmth and closeness in close dyadic relationships (partner, best friend) (McAdams 1992), whereas the affiliation motive is the desire to feel liked and accepted and enjoy the companionship of other persons or groups of persons (close or less close). Due to a large phenomenological overlap (e.g., both concepts involve the chronic desire to spend harmonious time with other people) later versions of affiliation motivation have combined features of both concepts into a single concept (called affiliation/intimacy, for example, by Winter 1991).
When controlling for the participants’ age, the main effect of competence satisfaction remained stable (b = −.47, se b = .07, p < .001) and the ACH x ComNeedSat was not significant (b = −0.9, se b = .06, p = .11).
References
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Alsleben, P. (2008). Das Bedürfnis nach Freiheit: Selbstintegration als viertes Basismotiv [The need for freedom: Self-integration as a fourth social motive]. Saarbrücken: VDM-Verlag.
Alsleben, Ph., & Kuhl, J. (2010). Touching a person’s essence: Using implicit motives as personal resources in counseling. In W. M. Cox & E. Klinger (Eds.), Handbook of motivational counseling: Motivating people for change (2nd ed., pp. 109–131). Sussex: Wiley.
Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
Atkinson, J. W., & Feather, N. T. (Eds.). (1966). A theory of achievement motivation. New York: Wiley.
Atkinson, J. W., Heyns, R. W., & Veroff, J. (1954). The effect of experimental arousal of the affiliation motive on thematic apperception. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49, 405–410.
Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Intrinsic need satisfaction: A motivational basis of performance and well-being in two work settings. Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 2045–2068.
Baumann, N., Kazén, M., & Kuhl, J. (2010). Implicit motives: A look from personality systems interaction theory. In O. C. Schultheiss & J. C. Brunstein (Eds.), Implicit motives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baumeister, R., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.
Brunstein, J. C., & Heckhausen, H. (2008). Achievement motivation. In J. Heckhausen & H. Heckhausen (Eds.), Motivation and action (2nd ed., pp. 137–183). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Brunstein, J. C., & Maier, G. W. (2005). Implicit and self-attributed motives to achieve: Two separate but interacting needs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(2), 205–222.
Cohen, P., Cohen, J., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis fort the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Abuhamdeh, S., & Nakamura, J. (2005). Flow. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 598–608). New York: Guilford Publications, Inc.
deCharms, R. (1968/1983). Personal causation. New York: Academic Press.
DeCharms, R. (1992). Personal causation and the origin concept. In C. Smith, J. W. Atkinson, & D. C. McClelland (Eds.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 325–333). New York: Cambridge University Press.
DeCharms, R., & Plimpton, F. (1992). The origin scoring system. In C. P. Smith (Ed.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 334–375). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 38). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
French, E. G., & Chadwick, I. (1956). Some characteristics of affiliation motivation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 296–300.
Gable, S. L. (2006). Approach and avoidance social motives and goals. Journal of Personality, 74, 175–222.
Gable, S. L., Reis, H. T., & Elliot, A. J. (2003). Evidence for bivariate systems: An empirical test of appetition and aversion across domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 349–372.
Gagné, M. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 199–223.
Heckhausen, J., & Heckhausen, H. (Eds.). (2010). Motivation and action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hofer, J., & Busch, H. (2011). Satisfying one’s needs for competence and relatedness: Consequent domain-specific well-being depends on strength of implicit motives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(9), 1147–1158.
Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Illardi, B. C., Leone, D., Kasser, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). Employee and supervisor ratings of motivation: Main effects and discrepancies associated with job satisfaction and adjustment in a factory setting. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1789–1805.
Jackson, D. N. (1984). Personality research form manual. Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press.
Kashdan, T. B., Julian, T., Merritt, K., & Uswatte, G. (2006). Social anxiety and posttraumatic stress in combat veterens: Relations to well-being and character strengths. Behavior Research and Therapy, 44, 561–583.
Kasser, V., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). The relation of psychological needs for autonomy and relatedness to vitality, well-being, and mortality in a nursing home. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 935–954.
Kehr, H. M. (2004). Implicit/explicit motive discrepancies and volitional depletion among managers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 315–327.
Krohne, H. W., Egloff, B., Kohlmann, W., & Tausch, A. (1996). Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der PANAS. Diagnostica, 44, 139–156.
Kuhl, J., & Scheffer, D. (2012). Auswertungsmanual für den Operanten Multi-Motiv Test (OMT)—revidierte Fassung [Scoring Manual of the Operant Multi-Motive Test (OMT)—revised version]. Osnabrück, Germany: University of Osnabrück.
Langens, T. A., & Schmalt, H.-D. (2002). Emotional consequences of positive daydreaming: The moderating role of fear of failure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1725–1735. doi:10.1177/014616702237653.
Langens, T. A., & Schmalt, H.-D. (2008). Motivational traits: New directions and measuring motives with the multi-motive grid (MMG). In G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), Personality theory and assessment (pp. 523–544). London: Sage Publications Ldt.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper.
Lynch, M. F., La Guardia, J. G., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). On being yourself in different cultures: Ideal and actual self-concept, autonomy support and well-being in China, Russia and the United States. The Journal of Positively Psychology, 4, 290–304.
McAdams, D. P. (1980). A thematic coding system for the intimacy motive. Journal of Research in Personality, 14, 413–432.
McAdams, D. P. (1992). The intimacy motive. In D. C. McClelland, J. Veroff, C. P. Smith, & J. W. Atkinson (Eds.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 224–228). New York: Cambridge University Press.
McClelland, D. C. (1985). Human motivation. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L. (1953). The achievement motive. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
McClelland, D. C., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96(4), 690–702.
Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Wiley.
Pang, J. S., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2005). Assessing implicit motives in U. S. college students: Effects of picture type and position, gender and ethnicity, and cross-cultural comparisons. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 280–294.
Puca, R. M. (2005). The influence of the achievement motive on probability estimates in pre- and post-decisional action phases. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 245–262.
Puca, R. M., Rinkenauer, G., & Breidenstein, C. (2006). Individual differences in approach and avoidance movements: How the avoidance motive influences response force. Journal of Personality, 74(4), 979–1014.
Puca, R. M., & Schmalt, H.-D. (1999). Task enjoyment: A mediator between achievement motives and performance. Motivation and Emotion, 23, 15–29.
Reis, H. T., Sheldon, K. M., Gable, S. L., Roscoe, J., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Daily well-being: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 419–435.
Rheinberg, F., Vollmeyer, R., & Engeser, S. (2003). Die Erfassung des Flow Erlebens [Measuring flow experience]. In J. Stiensmeier-Pelster & F. Rheinberg (Eds.), Diagnostik von Motivation und Selbstkonzept (pp. 261–279). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Ryan, R. M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality, 63, 397–427.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). Rochester, NY: Rochester University Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Self-determination theory and the role of basic psychological needs in personality and the organization of behavior. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, L. A. Pervin (Eds.) Handbook of personality psychology: Theory and research (3rd edn., pp. 654–678). xv, p 862. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Grolnick, W. S. (1986). Origins and pawns in the classroom: Self-report and projective assessments of children’s perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 550–558.
Ryan, R. M., La Guardia, J. G., Solky-Butzel, J., Chirkov, V. I., & Kim, Y. (2005). On the interpersonal regulation of emotions: Emotional reliance across gender, relationships, and cultures. Personal Relationships, 12, 145–163.
Schmalt, H.-D. (1999). Assessing the achievement motive using the grid technique. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 109–130.
Schneider, K., & Schmalt, H. D. (2000). Motivation [Motivation]. Stuttgart (Germany): Kohlhammer.
Schüler, J. (2007). Arousal of flow-experience in a learning setting and its effects on exam-performance and affect. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 21, 217–227.
Schüler, J. (2010). Achievement incentives determine the effects of achievement-motive incongruence on flow experience. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 2–14.
Schüler, J. (2012). The experience of basic need satisfaction as an activity-related incentive for implicit motives, in prep.
Schüler, J., & Brandstätter, V. (2012). How basic need satisfaction and dispositional motives interact in predicting flow experience in sport. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, in press.
Schüler, J., Job, V., Fröhlich, S., & Brandstätter, V. (2008). A high implicit affiliation motive does not always make you happy. Motivation and Emotion, 32, 231–242.
Schüler, J., Sheldon, K. M., & Fröhlich, S. M. (2010). Implicit need for achievement moderates the relationship between felt competence and subsequent motivation. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 1–12.
Schultheiss, O. C. (2008). Implicit motives. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 603–633). New York: Guilford.
Schultheiss, O. C., & Brunstein, J. C. (1999). Goal imagery: Bridging the gap between implicit motives and explicit goals. Journal of Personality, 67, 1–38.
Schultheiss, O. C., & Hale, J. (2007). Implicit motives modulate attentional orienting to facial expressions of emotion. Motivation and Emotion, 31, 13–24.
Schultheiss, O. C., Liening, S., & Schad, D. (2008). The reliability of a picture story exercise measure of implicit motives: Estimates of internal consistency, retest reliability, and ipsative stability. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1560–1571.
Schultheiss, O. C., & Pang, J. S. (2007). Measuring implicit motives. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 322–344). New York: Guilford.
Sheldon, K. M. (2004). Optimal human being: An integrated multi-level perspective. New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Sheldon, K. M., Cheng, C., & Hilpert, J. (2011). Understanding well-being and optimal functioning: Applying the multilevel personality in context (MPIC) model. Psychological Inquiry, 22, 1–16.
Sheldon, K. M., & Filak, C. (2008). Manipulating autonomy, competence, and relatedness support in a game-learning context: New evidence that all three needs matter. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 267–283.
Sheldon, K. M., & Niemiec, C. (2006). Its not just the amount that counts: Balanced need-satisfaction also affects well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 331–341.
Sheldon, K. M., & Schüler, J. (2011). Wanting, having, and needing: integrating motive disposition theory and self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(5), 1106–1123.
Sokolowski, K., & Kehr, H. M. (1999). Zum differentiellen Einfluss von Motiven auf die Wirkungen von Führungstrainings (MbO) [Differential impact of motive dispositions on the effects of management training (MbO)]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 20, 192–202.
Sokolowski, K., Schmalt, H.-D., Langens, T. A., & Puca, R. M. (2000). Assessing achievement, affiliation, and power motives all at once—the multi-motive grid (MMG). Journal of Personality Assessment, 74, 126–145.
Spangler, W. D. (1992). Validity of questionnaire and TAT measures of need for achievement: Two meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 140–154.
Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 271–360.
Van den Broek, A., Vansteenkiste, M., de Witte, H., Soenens, B., & Lens, W. (2010). Capturing autonomy, competende and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the work-related basic need satisfaction scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 981–1002.
Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., Soenens, B., & Luyckx, K. (2006). Autonomy and relatedness among Chinese sojourners and applicants: Conflictual or independent predictors of well-being and adjustment? Motivation and Emotion, 30, 273–282.
Vansteenkiste, M., Niemiec, C., & Soenens, B. (2010). The development of the five mini-theories of self-determination theory: An historical overview, emerging trends, and future directions. In T. Urdan & S. Karabenick (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement, vol. 16: The decade ahead (pp. 105–166). UK: Emerald Publishing.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297–333.
Williams, G. C., Niemiec, C. P., Patrick, H., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2009). The importance of supporting autonomy and perceived competence in facilitating long-term tobacco abstinence. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 37, 315–324.
Winter, D. G. (1973). The power motive. New York: The Free Press.
Winter, D. G. (1994). Manual for scoring motive imagery in running text. Unpublished instrument, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Acknowledgments
We thank Snjezana Kovjanic for her great help in data collection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schüler, J., Brandstätter, V. & Sheldon, K.M. Do implicit motives and basic psychological needs interact to predict well-being and flow? Testing a universal hypothesis and a matching hypothesis. Motiv Emot 37, 480–495 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-012-9317-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-012-9317-2