Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The European Union Solidarity Fund

Its legitimacy, viability and efficiency

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the legitimacy, viability and efficiency of the European Union Solidarity Fund by asking whether the Fund meets its stated purpose of providing solidarity within the EU, whether it is sufficiently capitalized and if it promotes disaster risk reduction in Europe. In examining these questions, we make use of ADAM models of disaster risks throughout Europe. We conclude that the Solidarity Fund falls short on all three counts, and we suggest possible alternatives. Most far-reaching, we explore whether the EUSF could support insurance systems in Europe by, among other possible activities, capitalizing national public-private insurance programs and providing support for government risk transfer. This would leverage the Fund’s capital and would overcome barriers to the provision of private and public sector insurance in uncertain catastrophe markets. It would also make insurance more affordable to Europe’s most vulnerable communities. Finally, it would reduce the disincentives for risk reduction inherent in post-disaster assistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. However, the distributions are skewed and therefore these numbers must be treated with caution.

  2. It should be noted, that this is an imperfect measure of epistemic uncertainty and likely underestimates the losses.

  3. For a detailed discussion see Hochrainer and Pflug (2010).

References

  • Arrow KJ, Lind RC (1970) Uncertainty and the evaluation of public investment decisions. Am Econ Rev 60:364–378

    Google Scholar 

  • BaFin (2003) Die Elementarversicherung als Pflichtversicherung—ein Konzept für die Zukunft? Diskussionspapier zur Sitzung des Versicherungsbeirats bei der BaFin vom 18 März 2003

  • Cardenas V, Hochrainer S, Mechler R, Pflug G, Linnerooth-Bayer J (2007) Sovereign financial disaster risk management: the case of Mexico. Environmental Hazards 7:40–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission Report (2004) European Union Solidarity Fund annual report 2002–2003 and report on the experience gained after one year of applying the new instrument. Com (2004) 397 final, Brussels, 26.5.2004

  • Commission Report (2005) European Union Solidarity Fund annual report 2004. Com (2005) 709 final, Brussels, 23.12.2005

  • Commission Report (2006) European Union Solidarity Fund annual report 2005. Com (2006) 444 final, Brussels, 7.8.2006

  • Commission Report (2007) European Union Solidarity Fund annual report. Com (2007) 632 final, Brussels, 25.10.2007

  • Commission Report (2008) European Union Solidarity Fund annual report. Com (2008) 722 final, Brussels, 12.11.2008

  • Council Regulation (2002) No. 2012/2002 of 11 November 2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund

  • CRED (2009) EM-DAT: international disaster database, centre for research on the epidemiology of disasters. Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Caneja MB, Conte CG, Gallego Pinilla FJ, Stroblmair J, Catenaro R, Dittmann C (2009) Risk management and agricultural. Insurance Schemes in Europe. EUR Report 23943. Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen, EC Joint Research Centre, Ispra

    Google Scholar 

  • Embrechts P, Klüppelberg C, Mikosch T (1997) Modelling extremal events. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • EurActive Network (2007) Parliament wants more money and an “EU force” for natural disasters. Published: 5 September 2007. http://www.euractiv.com/en/environment/parliament-wants-money-eu-force-natural-disasters/article-166462. 1. December, 2009

  • Eur-Lex (2009) Access to European law. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm. 1. December, 2009

  • European Commission (2007) European commission addressing the challenge of water scarcity and droughts in the European Union, communication from the commission to the European parliament and the council. COM (2007) 414 final, Brussels, July 2007

  • European Commission DG Agriculture and DG Joint Research Centre (2006). Agricultural insurance schemes, Final Report

  • FloodSite (2007) Evaluating flood damages: guidance and recommendations on principles and methods. Report number T09-06-01. Available at: http://www.floodsite.net/html/partner_area/project_docs/T09_06_01_Flood_damage_guidelines_D9_1_v2_2_p44.pdf. 1 December, 2009

  • Gurenko E (2004) Catastrophe risk and reinsurance: a country risk management perspective. Risk Books, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guy Carpenter (2003) The world catastrophe reinsurance market 2003. Guy Carpenter, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirabayashi Y, Kanae S, Emori S, Oki T, Kimoto M (2008) Global projections of changing risks of floods and droughts in a changing climate. Hydrol Sci J 53:754–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochrainer S (2006) Macroeconomic risk management against natural disasters. German University Press (DUV), Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochrainer S, Mechler R (2009) A2.3 b 36-month deliverable: report on Europe’s financial and economic vulnerability to meteorological extremes. Project title: Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies: Supporting European Climate Policy. www.adamproject.eu. 1. December, 2009

  • Hochrainer S, Pflug G (2010) Natural disaster risk bearing ability of governments. Journal of Natural Disaster Science (forthcoming)

  • Huber M (2004) Insurability and Regulatory Reform: is the English Flood Insurance Regime Able to Adapt to Climate Change? The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance: Issues and Practice 29:169–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundzewicz ZB, Hochrainer S, Lugeri B, Dankers R, Hirabayashi Y, Doell P, Pinskwar I, Dysarz T, Matczak P (2010) Assessing risk and adaptation to river floods in Europe in a changing climate—projections for the future. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change (forthcoming)

  • Linnerooth-Bayer J, Amendola A (2000) Global change, natural disasters and loss-sharing: issues of efficiency and equity. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance: Issues and Practice 25:203–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnerooth-Bayer J, Mechler R (2004) Financing disaster risks in developing and emerging-economy countries. Paper presented at the OECD conference, “Catastrophic Risks and Insurance”, Paris, November 22, 2004

  • Linnerooth-Bayer J, Mechler R (2007) Disaster safety nets for developing countries: extending public–private partnerships. Environmental Hazards 7:54–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnerooth-Bayer J, Vari A (2006) Extreme weather and burden sharing in Hungary. In: Adger WN, Huq S, Mace MJ, Paavola J (eds) Fairness in adaptation to climate change. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnerooth-Bayer J, Quijano-Evans S, Löfstedt R, Elahi S (2001) The uninsured elements of natural catastrophic losses: seven case studies of earthquake and flood disasters. Summary Report, Project funded by the UK Tsunami fund, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria

  • Lugeri N, Kundzewicz ZB, Hochrainer S, Genovese E, Radziejewski M (2010) River flood risk and adaptation in Europe—assessment of the present status. Submitted to Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change (forthcoming)

  • Mechler R, Hochrainer S, Linnerooth-Bayer J, Pflug G (2006) Public sector financial vulnerability to disasters. The IIASA-Catsim model. In: Birkmann J (ed) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards. Towards disaster resilient societies. United Nations University Press, Shibuya-ku, pp 380–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Mechler R, Hochrainer S, Aaheim A, Kundzewicz Z, Lugeri N, Moriondo M, Salen H, Bindi M, Banaszak I, Chorynski A, Genovese E, Kalirai H, Linnerooth-Bayer J, Lavalle C, McEvoy D, Matczak P, Radziejewski M, Rübbelke D, Schelhaas M-J, Szwed M, Wreford A (2009) A risk management approach for assessing adaptation to changing flood and drought risks in Europe. In: Hulme M, Neufeldt H (eds) Making climate change work for us: European perspectives on adaptation and mitigation strategies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (accepted)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriondo M, Kundzewicz Z, Kedziora A, Szwed M, Matczak P, Radziejewski M, McEvoy D, Wreford A (2010) Assessing risk and adapting to drought and heat waves in agriculture of the European Union. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change (forthcoming)

  • Raschky P, Weck-Hannemann H (2007) Charity hazard—a real hazard to natural disaster insurance? Environmental Hazards 7:321–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarze R (2008) Financial risks of natural hazards: markets and the role of the state. Schmollers Jahrbuch (Journal of Applied Social Science Studies), SJ 128:545–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Ungern-Sternberg T (2004) Efficient monopolies: the limits of competition in the European property insurance market. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • ZENAR/BMLFUW (2003) Ereignisdokumentation Hochwasser August 2002. Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Wien

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Hochrainer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hochrainer, S., Linnerooth-Bayer, J. & Mechler, R. The European Union Solidarity Fund. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 15, 797–810 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-009-9209-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-009-9209-2

Keywords

Navigation