Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 217–227

Accountability for reasonableness: the relevance, or not, of exceptionality in resource allocation

Scientific Contribution

DOI: 10.1007/s11019-014-9592-7

Cite this article as:
Ford, A. Med Health Care and Philos (2015) 18: 217. doi:10.1007/s11019-014-9592-7
  • 272 Downloads

Abstract

Accountability for Reasonableness has gained international acceptance as a framework to assist with resource allocation within healthcare. Despite this, one of the four conditions, the relevance condition, has not been widely adopted. In this paper I will start by examining the relevance condition, and the constraints placed on it by Daniels and Sabin. Following this, I review the theoretical limitations of the condition identified to date, by prominent critics such as Rid, Friedman, Lauridsen and Lippert—Rasmussen. Finally, I respond to Daniels and Sabin’s enthusiasm for testing the accountability for reasonableness framework in different contexts, by evaluating the challenges of implementing the relevance condition within the NHS. I use the funding of treatments for patients on the basis of their exceptional circumstances as a case study to examine whether the relevance condition could be applied in practice.

Keywords

Accountability for reasonableness Relevance condition Exceptionality Resource allocation Ethical framework 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of LawUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK