Abstract
Seismic migration algorithms are often used to reveal subsurface structures and can be roughly divided into stacking methods, pre-stack time migration methods and pre-stack depth migration methods. In theory, pre-stack depth migration methods can provide the most accurate subsurface images. However, these methods are sensitive to the accuracy of the migration velocity model, and thus the creation of a precise migration velocity model is one of the most important steps in seismic processing. We applied the tomographic travel-time inversion and the method of pre-stack Kirchhoff depth migration-based migration velocity analysis (MVA) to certain South China Sea data, in which we iteratively inverted the precise, high-resolution migration velocity model. We selected travel-time differences from the offset-domain common image gathers of the pre-stack Kirchhoff depth migration and inverted the travel-time differences for velocity updating. After several iterations, both the precise migration velocity model and the corresponding pre-stack depth migration image were obtained. The comparisons with Normal Move-out stacking and pre-stack Kirchhoff time migration confirm that the tomographic MVA and corresponding pre-stack Kirchhoff depth migration provide the best image quality and highest-resolution subsurface images from the South China Sea data.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biondi B, Symes W (2004) Angle-domain common-image gathers for migration velocity analysis by wavefield-continuation imaging. Geophysics 69:1283–1298
Biondo B (2006) 3D Seismic imaging. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa
Deregowski S (1990) Common offset migrations and velocity analysis. First Break 8(6):224–234
Hargreaves N, Cooper N (2001) High-resolution Radon Demultiple, 71st annual international meeting, SEG, expanded abstracts, pp 1325–1328
Higginbotham J, Brown M, Macesanu C (2010) Depth migration velocity model building with wave equation imaging. First Break 28:27–33
Leggott RJ (2006) Time migration tomography, 68th EAGE conference & exhibition
Lester R, McIntosh K (2012) Multiple attenuation in crustal-scale imaging: examples from the TAIGER marine reflection data set. Mar Geophys Res 33:289–305
Rickett J, Sava P (2002) Offset and angle-domain common image point gathers for shot-profile migration. Geophysics 67:883–889
Sacchi MD, Porsani M (1999) Fast high resolution parabolic Radon transform, 69th, annual international meeting, SEG, expanded abstracts, pp1477–1480
Schonewille MA, Aaron PA (2007) Applications of time-domain high-resolution Radon demultiple: 77th annual international meeting, SEG, expanded abstracts, pp 2565–2569
Song J, Reta-Tang C, Ma X, Rodriguez G, Beck B, Hokanson N, Xu J, Snyder A (2012) Complex structural imaging in the Tarakan Basin—a case study, offshore Indonesia, 82nd SEG annual meeting. doi:10.1190/segam2012-1343.1
Verschuur DJ, Berkhout AJ, Wapenaar CPA (1992) Adaptive surface-related multiple elimination. Geophysics 57:1166–1177
Wang Y, Luo Y, Schuster GT (2009) Interferometric interpolation of missing seismic data. Geophysics 74(3):SI37–SI45
Wang Y, Dong S, Luo Y (2010) Model-based interferometric interpolation method. Geophysics 75(6):WB211–WB217
Yilmaz OZ (2001) Seismic data processing, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa
Zhou H, Guo J, Young J (2001) An alternative residual-curvature updating method for prestack depth migration, 71st SEG expanded abstracts, pp 877–880
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by National Science and Technology Major Project of China (Grant No. 2011ZX05030-004-001). We thank Prof. ChunFeng Li and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments, which greatly improved this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Y., Xu, J., Xie, S. et al. Seismic imaging of subsurface structure using tomographic migration velocity analysis: a case study of South China Sea data. Mar Geophys Res 36, 127–137 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11001-014-9245-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11001-014-9245-5