Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Earth Jurisprudence, Wild Law, Emergent Law: The Emerging Field of Ecology and Law—Part 2

  • Published:
Liverpool Law Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article does two things. First, it explores the emerging field of ecology and law through the examination of Earth Jurisprudence developed in the work of Berry, Cullinan, and Burdon. Second, it puts this Earth Jurisprudence and the emerging field of ecology and law in connection with the wide ranging philosophical work of Deleuze & Guattari. Earth Jurisprudence and the emerging field of ecology and law are introduced through the exploration of four themes that characterise the field of study: a critique of the dominant western worldview and image of thought; a new philosophy of nature widely informed by contemporary science and cosmology; a new relation to the Earth and nature in affectual intensities, image of thinking, and investment of the social field; and, the realisation of the necessity and centrality of a fundamental reconceptualization of legality and governance. The Earth Jurisprudence of Berry, Cullinan, and Burdon (particularly Cullinan’s Wild Law: A Manifesto for Earth Justice) is then explored substantively in Cullinan’s reconceptualization of legality, the Grand Jurisprudence that informs Earth Jurisprudence, the Earth Jurisprudence of the promotion of mutual ecocentric human–Earth enhancement, the development of Earth rights, the reconceptualization of property and land, and the Wild Law that Earth Jurisprudence produces as the outcome of its creativity. Earth Jurisprudence and the emerging field of ecology and law are a far-reaching development within legal studies, with potentially profound implications for our contemporary conceptualisation of legality and governance and the creation of a concept of law for a new Earth. When put into connection with the wide ranging philosophical joint work of Deleuze & Guattari there emerge striking commonalities, convergences, and a common jurisprudential project of the creation of a legality for a new Earth. The article concludes with the argument that the work of Deleuze & Guattari could provide a key resource for the development of Earth Jurisprudence and the emerging field of ecology and law, particularly the Deleuze & Guattari jurisprudential concept of emergent law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Burdon (2011) p. 59.

  2. Cullinan (2011a, b, c) p. 54.

  3. Berry (1999).

  4. Greene (2011) p. 132.

  5. Cullinan (2011a, b, c) p. 82.

  6. Berry (1999), Berry and Swinne (1992), Greene (2011).

  7. Cullinan (2011a, b, c) p. 78.

  8. Greene (2011).

  9. Filgueria and Mason (2011) p. 197.

  10. Murray (2006).

  11. Cullinan (2011a, b, c) p. 78.

  12. Cullinan (2011a) p. 13.

  13. Cullinan (2011a, b, c) p. 68/72.

  14. Ibid. p. 44.

  15. Burdon (2011) p. 60.

  16. Berry, quoted Cullinan (2011a, b, c) p. 49.

  17. Burdon (2011) p. 60.

  18. Koons (2011) p. 55.

  19. Cullinan (2011a, b, c) p. 117/105.

  20. Ibid. p. 170.

  21. Burdon (2011) p. 66.

  22. Bosselmann (2011) p. 205.

  23. Cullinan (2011a, b, c).

  24. Cullinan (2011b) p. 235.

  25. Greene (2011) p. 128.

  26. Berry (2011).

  27. Cullinan (2011a, b, c) p. 142, Graham (2012).

  28. Cullinan (2011a, b, c) p. 145.

  29. Graham (2011 p. 267, 2012).

  30. Cullinan (2011a, b, c) p. 117, Sax (1970).

  31. Ibid. p. 114.

  32. Lyon (2011) p. 141.

  33. Cullinan (2011a, b, c) p. 29–31.

  34. Ibid. p. 30.

  35. Ibid. p. 30–31.

  36. Ibid. p. 30.

  37. Cullinan (2011b) p. 234.

  38. Cullinan (2011a, b, c) pp. 157–68.

  39. Ibid. p. 30, Ibid. p. 159.

  40. Filguiera and Mason (2011).

  41. Cullinan (2011a, b, c) p. 32.

  42. Burdon (2011).

  43. Cullinan (2011a, b, c) p. 177, Bosselmann (2011).

  44. Filguiera and Mason (2011).

  45. Berry (2011).

  46. Engel and Mackey (2011).

  47. Cullinan (2011a, b, c) p. 142.

  48. Koons (2011) p. 46, Mason (2011) p. 41.

  49. Filgueira and Mason (2011).

  50. Cullinan (2011a, b, c) p. 128.

  51. Ibid. p. 151.

  52. Harding (2011) p. 82.

  53. Cullinan (2011a, b, c) p. 177.

  54. Filgueira and Mason (2011) p. 192.

  55. Cullinan (2011a) p. 19.

  56. Cullinan (2011a, b, c) p. 20, Margil (2011) p. 249.

  57. Sheehan (2011) p. 236.

  58. See Murray (2013).

  59. Herzogenrath (2009).

  60. Halsey (2006).

  61. Alliez (2004).

  62. Bonterra and Protevi (2004).

  63. Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos (2012, 2012a), and see Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos (2013).

  64. Deleuze and Guattari (1987) pp. 39–74.

  65. Deleuze and Guattari (1994) pp. 85–116.

  66. Deleuze and Guattari (1987) pp. 310–50.

  67. Ibid. pp. 232–309.

  68. Deleuze (1994).

  69. Murray (2013).

  70. Ibid. pp. 150–58.

  71. Ibid.

  72. Ibid. pp. 133–49.

  73. Ibid. pp. 133–49.

  74. Ibid. pp. 13–32.

  75. Ibid. pp. 33–54.

  76. Ibid. pp. 55–86.

  77. Ibid. pp. 13–32.

  78. Guattari (2000).

References

  • Alliez, E. 2004. The signature of the world: What is the philosophy of Deleuze & Guattari?. New york: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, T. 1999. The great work: Our way into the future. UK: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, T. 2011. Rights of the earth. In Exploring wild law: The philosophy of earth jurisprudence, ed. P. Burdon. Adelaide: Wakefield Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, T., and B. Swimme. 1992. The universe story: From the primordial flaring forth to the ecozoic era. New york: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonta, M., and J. Protevi. 2004. Deleuze and geophilosophy: A guide and glossary. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosselmann, K. 2011. From reductionist environmental law to sustainability law. In Exploring wild law: The philosophy of earth jurisprudence, ed. P. Burdon, 204–213. Adelaide: Wakefield Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdon, P. (ed.). 2011. Exploring wild law: The philosophy of earth jurisprudence. Adelaide: Wakefield Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullinan, C. 2011a. Wild law: A manifesto for earth justice, 2nd ed. Totnes: Green Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullinan, C. 2011b. A history of wild law. In Exploring wild law: The philosophy of earth jurisprudence, ed. P. Burdon, 12–23. Adelaide: Wakefield Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullinan, C. 2011c. If nature had rights what would we need to give up? In Exploring wild law: The philosophy of earth jurisprudence, ed. P. Burdon, 230–235. Adelaide: Wakefield Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. 1994. Difference and repetition. London: Athlone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A thousand plateaus. London: Athlone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1994. What is philosophy?. New york: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, R., and B. Mackey. 2011. The earth charter, covenants, and earth jurisprudence. In Exploring wild law: The philosophy of earth jurisprudence, ed. P. Burdon, 313–323. Adelaide: Wakefield Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filgueria, B., and I. Mason. 2011. Wild law: Is there any evidence of earth jurisprudence in existing law? In Exploring wild law: The philosophy of earth jurisprudence, ed. P. Burdon, 192–203. Adelaide: Wakefield Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, N. 2011. Owning the Earth. In Exploring wild law: The philosophy of earth jurisprudence, ed. P. Burdon, 259–269. Adelaide: Wakefield Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, N. 2012. Lawscape: Property, environment, law. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, H. 2011. Cosmology and earth jurisprudence. In Exploring wild law: The philosophy of earth jurisprudence, ed. P. Burdon, 126–136. Adelaide: Wakefield Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guattari, F. 2000. Three ecologies. London: Athlone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halsey, M. 2006. Deleuze and environmental damage. farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. 2011. Gaia and earth jurisprudence. In Exploring wild law: The philosophy of earth jurisprudence, ed. P. Burdon, 79–84. Adelaide: Wakefield Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzogenrath, B. (ed.). 2009. Deleuze|Guattari and ecology. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koons, J. 2011. Key principles to transform law for the health of the planet. In Exploring wild law: The philosophy of earth jurisprudence, ed. P. Burdon, 45–58. Adelaide: Wakefield Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, P. 2011. Extracting norms from nature: A biogenetic approach to ethics. In Exploring wild law: The philosophy of earth jurisprudence, ed. P. Burdon, 137–145. Adelaide: Wakefield Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margil, M. 2011. Stories from the environmental frontier. In Exploring wild law: The philosophy of earth jurisprudence, ed. P. Burdon, 249–258. Adelaide: Wakefield Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, I. 2011. One in all: Principles and characteristics of earth jurisprudence. In Exploring wild law: The philosophy of earth jurisprudence, ed. P. Burdon. Adelaide: Wakefield Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J. 2006. Nome law: Deleuze & Guattari on the emergence of law. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 19: 127–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J. 2013. Deleuze & Guattari: Emergent law. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. 2012a. Law and ecology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. 2012b. Looking for the space between law and ecology. In Law and ecology, ed. A. Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, 1–17. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. 2013. The normativity of an animal atmosphere. In Law and the question of the animal: A critical jurisprudence, ed. Y. Utomo, and E. Mussawir. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sax, J. 1970. The public trust doctrine in natural resources law. Michigan Law Review 68: 479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, L. 2011. Earth day revisited: Building a body of earth law for the next forty years. In Exploring wild law: The philosophy of earth jurisprudence, ed. P. Burdon, 236–248. Adelaide: Wakefield Pres.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jamie Murray.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Murray, J. Earth Jurisprudence, Wild Law, Emergent Law: The Emerging Field of Ecology and Law—Part 2. Liverpool Law Rev 36, 105–122 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-015-9170-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-015-9170-y

Keywords

Navigation