Abstract
We employed a sliding-window approach at multiple scales (window sizes and dispersal distances) to calculate seven standard graph-theoretical metrics within a subset of a large, freshwater wetland network. In contrast to most graph analyses, which quantify connectivity at a single (global) scale or at a patch-level scale, a multi-scaled, sliding-window approach provides an assessment that bridges these two approaches to examine patch clusters. As a case study we focused on a subset of a habitat patch network in a ~20,000 km2 area encompassing 2,782 playa wetlands in the panhandle of Texas. Playas are seasonal wetlands of the southern Great Plains of North America that form a network of regional habitat resources for wildlife. The large size of this network meant that global metrics failed to capture localized properties, so we used contour mapping to visualize continuous surfaces as functions of playa density, linkage density, and other topological traits at different window sizes and dispersal distances. This technique revealed spatial patterns in the components (i.e., the network properties of regions of the landscape at a given dispersal scale), with the spatial scale of habitat clustering varying with the size of the sliding window and dispersal distance. Using a tool familiar to landscape ecology (sliding-window methodology) in a novel way (to examine ecological networks at multiple scales), our approach provides a way to represent ecologically determined local-scale graph properties and illustrates how a multi-scaled approach is useful in examining habitat connectivity to investigate graph properties.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bodin Ö, Norberg J (2007) A network approach for analyzing spatially structured populations in fragmented landscape. Landscape Ecol 22:31–44
Bodin Ö, Saura S (2010) Ranking individual habitat patches and connectivity providers: integrating network analysis and patch removal experiments. Ecol Model 221:2393–2405
Bolen EG, Smith LM, Schramm HL (1989) Playa lakes: prairie wetlands of the Southern High Plains. Bioscience 39:615–623
Bunn A, Urban D, Keitt T (2000) Landscape connectivity: a conservation application of graph theory. J Environ Manage 59:265–278
Dale MRT, Fortin M-J (2010) From graphs to spatial graphs. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41:21–38
Fairbairn SE, Dinsmore JJ (2001) Local and landscape-level influences on wetland bird communities of the Prairie Pothole Region of Iowa, USA. Wetlands 21:41–47
Fall A, Fortin M-J, Manseau M, O’Brien D (2007) Spatial graphs: principles and applications for habitat connectivity. Ecosystems 10:448–461
Farina A (2000) Landscape ecology in action. Springer, New York
Fish EB, Atkinson EL, Mollhagen TR, Shanks CH, Brenton CM (1998) Playa lakes digital database for the Texas portion of the Playa Lakes Joint Venture region. Technical Publication #T-9-813, Department of Natural Resources Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock
Forman RTT, Godron M (1986) Landscape ecology. Wiley, New York
Fortuna MA, Gómez-Rodríguez C, Bascompte J (2006) Spatial network structure and amphibian persistence in stochastic environments. Proc R Soc Lond B 206:1429–1434
Galpern P, Manseau M, Fall A (2011) Patch-based graphs of landscape connectivity: a guide to construction, analysis and application for conservation. Biol Conserv 144:44–55
Gibbs JP (2000) Wetland loss and biodiversity conservation. Conserv Biol 14:314–317
Gray MJ, Smith LM, Leyva RI (2004) Influence of agricultural landscape structure on a Southern High Plains, USA, amphibian assemblage. Landscape Ecol 19:719–729
Habeeb RL, Trebilco J, Wotherspoon S, Johnson CR (2005) Determining natural scales of ecological systems. Ecol Monogr 75:467–487
Haukos DA, Smith LM (1994) The importance of playa wetlands to biodiversity of the Southern High Plains. Landsc Urban Plan 28:83–98
Iverson GC, Vohs PA, Tacha TC (1985) Habitat use by sandhill cranes wintering in western Texas. J Wildl Manage 49:1074–1083
Johnson LA (2011) Occurrence, function, and conservation of playa wetlands: the key to biodiversity of the southern Great Plains. Ph. D. dissertation. Texas Tech University, Lubbock
Johnson WC, Millett BV, Gilmanov T, Voldseth RA, Guntenspergen GR, Naugle DE (2005) Vulnerability of northern prairie wetlands to climate change. Bioscience 55:863–872
Johnson WC, Werner B, Guntenspergen GR, Voldseth RA, Millett B, Naugle DE, Tulbure M, Carroll RWH, Tracy J, Olawsky C (2010) Prairie wetland complexes as landscape functional units in a changing climate. Bioscience 60:128–140
Jordán F, Báldi A, Orci K-M, Rácz I, Varga Z (2003) Characterizing the importance of habitat patches and corridors in maintaining the landscape connectivity of a Pholidoptera transsylvanica (Orthoptera) metapopulation. Landscape Ecol 18:83–92
Karl TR, Melillo JM, Peterson TC (eds) (2009) Global climate change impacts in the United States. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Keitt TH, Urban DL, Milne BT (1997) Detecting critical scales in fragmented landscapes. Conserv Ecol 1:4. URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol1/iss1/art4/
Laita A, Kotiaho JS, Mönkkönen M (2011) Graph-theoretic connectivity measures: what do they tell us about connectivity? Landscape Ecol 26:951–967
Minor ES, Urban DL (2007) Graph theory as a proxy for spatially explicit population models in conservation planning. Ecol Appl 17:1771–1782
Minor ES, Urban DL (2008) A graph theory framework for evaluating landscape connectivity and conservation planning. Conserv Biol 22:297–307
Naugle DE, Higgins KF, Nusser SM, Johnson WC (1999) Scale-dependent habitat use in three species of prairie wetland birds. Landscape Ecol 14:267–276
O’Brien D, Manseau M, Fall A, Fortin M-J (2006) Testing the importance of spatial configuration of winter habitat for woodland caribou: an application of graph theory. Biol Conserv 130:70–83
Pascual-Hortal L, Saura S (2006) Comparison and development of new graph-based landscape connectivity indices: towards the prioritization of habitat patches and corridors for conservation. Landscape Ecol 21:959–967
Rayfield B, Fortin M-J, Fall A (2011) Connectivity for conservation: a framework to classify network measures. Ecology 92:847–858
Ricotta C, Stanisci A, Avena GC, Blasi C (2000) Quantifying the network connectivity of landscape mosaics: a graph-theoretical approach. Community Ecol 1:89–94
Saura S, Torné J (2009) Conefor Sensinode 2.2: a software package for quantifying the importance of habitat patches for landscape connectivity. Environ Model Softw 24:135–139
Smith LM (2003) Playas of the Great Plains. University of Texas Press, Austin
Tischendorf L, Fahrig L (2003) On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity. Oikos 90:7–19
Turner MG, Gardner RH (1994) Quantitative methods in landscape ecology: interpretation of landscape heterogeneity. Springer, New York
Urban D, Keitt T (2001) Landscape connectivity: a graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology 82:1205–1218
Urban DL, Minor ES, Treml EA, Schick RS (2009) Graph models of habitat mosaics. Ecol Lett 12:260–273
Vogt P, Ferrari JR, Lookingbill TR, Gardner RH, Riitters KH, Ostapowicz K (2009) Mapping functional connectivity. Ecol Indic 9:64–71
Acknowledgments
Comments from two reviewers improved this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McIntyre, N.E., Strauss, R.E. A new, multi-scaled graph visualization approach: an example within the playa wetland network of the Great Plains. Landscape Ecol 28, 769–782 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9862-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9862-4