Allen T.F.H. and Starr T.B. 1982. Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA.
Anderson D.R., Burnham K.P. and Thompson W.L. 2000. Null hypothesis testing: problems, prevalence, and an alternative. Journal of Wildlife Management 64: 912–923.
Andrzejewski R. 2002. The home-range concept in rodents revised. Acta Theriologica 47: 81–101.
Apps C.D., McLellan B.N., Kinley T.A. and Flaa J.P. 2001. Scale-dependent habitat selection by mountain caribou, Columbia Mountains, British Columbia. Journal of Wildlife Management 65: 65–77.
Arthur S.M., Manly B.F.J., McDonald L.L. and Garner G.W. 1996. Assessing habitat selection when availability changes. Ecology 77: 215–227.CrossRef
Bakker K.K., Naugle D.E. and Higgins K.F. 2002. Incorporating landscape attributes into models for migratory grassland bird conservation. Conservation Biology 16: 1638–1646.CrossRef
Ballard W.B., Reed D.J., Fancy S.G. and Krausman P.R. 1995. Accuracy, precision, and performance of satellite telemetry for monitoring wolf movements. In: Carbyn L.N., Fritts S.H. and Seip D.R. (eds), Ecology and Conservation of Wolves in a Changing World. Occasional Publication No. 35. Canadian Circumpolar Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, pp. 461–467.
Baskent E.Z. and Jordan G.A. 1995. Characterizing spatial structure of forest landscapes. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research 25: 1830–1849.
Bengtsson J., Fagerstrom T. and Rydin H. 1994. Competition and coexistence in plant communities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9: 246–250.CrossRef
Bergin T.M. 1992. Habitat selection by the Western Kingbird in western Nebraska: a hierarchical analysis. Condor 94: 903–911.
Blundell G.M., Maier J.A.K. and Debevec E.M. 2001. Linear home ranges: effects of smoothing, sample size, and autocorrelation on kernel estimates. Ecological Monographs 71: 469–489.CrossRef
Carroll C., Noss R.F. and Paquet P.C. 2001. Carnivores as focal species for conservation planning in the Rocky Mountain region. Ecological Applications 11: 961–980.CrossRef
Csillag F., Fortin M.-J. and Dungan J.L. 2000. On the limits and extensions of the definition of scale. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 81: 230–232.
Compton B.W., Rhymer J.M. and McCollough M. 2002. Habitat selection by wood turtles (Clemmys Insculpta): an application of paired logistic regression. Ecology 83: 833–843.
Dale M.R.T. 1990. Two-dimensional analysis of spatial pattern in vegetation for site comparison. Canadian Journal of Botany 68: 149–158.
Dale M.R.T. 1999. Spatial pattern analysis in plant ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, USA.
Dale M.R.T. 2000. Lacunarity analysis of spatial patterns: a comparison. Landscape Ecology 15: 467–478.CrossRef
Dale M.R.T., Dixon P., Fortin M.-J., Legendre P., Myers D.E. and Rosenberg M.S. 2002. Conceptual and mathematical relation-ships among methods for spatial analysis. Ecography 25: 558–577.CrossRef
Dale M.R.T. and Mah M. 1998. The use of wavelets for spatial pattern analysis in ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science 9: 805–814.CrossRef
Diaz S., Cabido M. and Casanoves F. 1998. Plant functional traits and environmental filters at a regional scale. Journal of Vegetation Science 9: 113–122.CrossRef
Dungan J., Perry J.N., Dale M.R.T., Legendre P., Citron-Pousty S., Fortin M.-J., Jakomulska A., Miriti M. and Rosenberg M.S. 2002. A balanced view of scale in spatial statistical analysis. Ecography 25: 626–640.CrossRef
Ecological Stratification Working Group. 1996. A National Ecological Framework for Canada. Environment Canada, State of the Environment Directorate, Ecozone Analysis Branch, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Fernandez N., Delibes M., Palomares F. and Mladenoff D.J. 2003. Identifying breeding habitat for the Iberian lynx: inferences from a fine-scale spatial analysis. Ecological Applications 13: 1310–1324.
Francis A.P. and Currie D.J. 2003. A globally consistent richness-climate relationship for angiosperms. American Naturalist 161: 523–536.PubMedCrossRef
Gustafson E.J. 1998. Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art? Ecosystems 1: 583–602.
Kie J.G., Bowyer R.T., Nicholson M.C., Boroski B.B. and Loft E.R. 2002. Landscape heterogeneity at different scales: effects on spatial distribution of mule deer. Ecology 83: 530–544.CrossRef
Gunn A., Dragon J. and Boulanger J. 2001. Seasonal movements of statellite-collared caribou from the Bathurst herd. Final Report to the West Kitikmeot/Slave Study Society, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, Canada.
Hall L.S., Krausman P.R. and Morrison M.L. 1997. The habitat concept and a plea for standard terminology. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25: 173–182.
Hardin J. and Hilbe J. 2001. Generalized Linear Models and Extensions. Stata Press, College Station, Texas, USA.
Hobbs R. 1997. Future landscapes and the future of landscape ecology. Landscape Urban Planning 37: 1–9.CrossRef
Hosmer D.W. and Lemeshow S. 2000. Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA.
Huston M.A. 1999. Local processes and regional patterns: appropriate scales for understanding variation in the diversity of plants and animals. Oikos 86: 393–401.
Johnson C.J. and Boyce M.S. 2004. A quantitative approach for regional environmental assessment: Application of a habitat-based population viability analysis to wildlife of the Canadian central Arctic. Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency Research and Development Monograph (in press).
Johnson C.J., Parker K.L. and Heard D.C. 2001. Foraging across a variable landscape: behavioural decisions made by woodland caribou at multiple spatial scales. Oecologia 127: 590–602.CrossRef
Johnson C.J., Parker K.L., Heard D.C. and Gillingham M.P. 2002a. A multiscale behavioral approach to understanding the movements of woodland caribou. Ecological Applications 12: 1840–1860.
Johnson C.J., Parker K.L., Heard D.C. and Gillingham M.P. 2002b. Movement parameters of ungulates and scale-specific responses to the environment. Journal of Animal Ecology 71: 225–235.CrossRef
Johnson D.H. 1980. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61: 65–71.CrossRef
Levin S.A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73: 1943–1967.CrossRef
Mace R.D., Waller J.S., Manley T.L., Ake K. and Wittinger W.T. 1999. Landscape evaluation of grizzly bear habitat in western Montana. Conservation Biology 13: 367–377.CrossRef
Manly B.F.J., McDonald L.L., Thomas D.L., McDonald T.L. and Erickson W.P. 2002. Resource Selection by Animals. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Matthews S., Epp H. and Smith G. 2001. Vegetation classification for the West Kitikmeot/Slave Study region. Final Report to the West Kitikmeot/Slave Study Society, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, Canada.
McGarigal K. and Marks B.J. 1995. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, General Technical Report PNW-351, Portland Oregon, USA.
McIntyre N.E. and Wiens J.A. 2000. A novel use of the lacunarity index to discern landscape function. Landscape Ecology 15: 313–321.CrossRef
McLoughlin P.D., Case R.L., Gau R.J., Cluff H.D., Mulders R. and Messier F. 2002. Hierarchical habitat selection by barren-ground grizzly bears in the central Canadian Arctic. Oecologia 132: 102–108.CrossRef
Menard S. 1995. Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, series no. 07-106. Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
Merrill T., Mattson D.J., Wright R.G. and Quigley H.B. 1999. Defining landscapes suitable for restoration of grizzly bears Ursus arctos
in Idaho. Biological Conservation 87: 231–248.CrossRef
Mladenoff D.J. and DeZonia B. 1999. APACK analysis software. Forest Ecology Lab, Department of Forestry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Mladenoff D.J., Sickley T.A. and Wydeven A.P. 1995. A regional landscape analysis and prediction of favourable Gray Wolf habitat in the northern Great Lakes region. Conservation Biology 9: 279–294.CrossRef
Morris D.W. 1987. Ecological scale and habitat use. Ecology 68: 362–369.CrossRef
Palmer M.W. 1988. Fractal geometry: a tool for describing spatial patterns of plant communities. Vegetatio 75: 91–102.CrossRef
Pascual M. and Levin S.A. 1999. From individuals to population densities: searching for the intermediate scale of nontrivial determinism. Ecology 80: 2225–2236.CrossRef
Pausas J.G. and Austin M.P. 2001. Patterns of plant species richness in relation to different environments: an appraisal. Journal of Vegetation Science 12: 153–166.
Pendergast J.F., Gange S.J., Newton M.A., Linstrom M.J., Palta M. and Fisher M.R. 1996. A survey of methods for analyzing clustered binary response data. International Statistical Review 64: 89–118.CrossRef
Perry J.N., Liebhold A.M., Rosenberg M.S., Dungan J., Miriti M., Jakomulska A. and Citron-Pousty S. 2002. Illustrations and guidelines for selecting statistical methods for quantifying spatial pattern in ecological data. Ecography 25: 578–600.CrossRef
Plotnick R.E., Gardner R.H. and O'Neill R.V. 1993. Lacunarity indices as measures of landscape texture. Landscape Ecology 8: 201–211.CrossRef
Rettie W.J. and Messier F. 2000. Hierarchical habitat selection by woodland caribou: its relationship to limiting factors. Ecography 23: 466–478.CrossRef
Ripley B.D. 1978. Spectral analysis and the analysis of pattern in plant communities. Journal of Ecology 66: 965–981.CrossRef
Riitters K.H., O'Neill R.V., Hunsaker C.T., Wickham J.D., Yankee D.H., Timmins S.P., Jones K.B. and Jackson B.L. 1995. A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landscape Ecology 10: 23–39.CrossRef
Rosenberg M.S. 2002. PASSAGE. Pattern Analysis, Spatial Statistics, and Geographic Exegesis. Version 1.0. Department of Biology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Saab V. 1999. Importance of spatial scale to habitat use by breeding birds in riparian forests: a hierarchical analysis. Ecological Applications 9: 135–151.CrossRef
Schaefer J.A. and Messier F. 1995. Habitat selection as a hierarchy: the spatial scales of winter foraging by muskoxen. Ecography 18: 333–344.CrossRef
Senft R.L., Coughenour M.B., Bailey D.W., Rittenhouse L.R., Sala O.E. and Swift D.M. 1987. Large herbivore foraging and ecological hierarchies. Bioscience 37: 789–799.CrossRef
Turner M.G., Dale V.H. and Gardner R.H. 1989. Predicting across scales: theory development and testing. Landscape Ecology 3: 245–252.CrossRef
Viswanathan G.M., Afanasyev V., Buldyrev S.V., Murphy E.J., Prince P.A. and Stanley H.E. 1996. Lévy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses. Nature 381: 413.CrossRef
Walton L.R., Cluff H.D., Paquet P.C. and Ramsay M.A. 2001. Movement patterns of barren-ground wolves in the central Canadian Arctic. Journal of Mammalogy 82: 867–876.CrossRef
Wiens J.A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecology 3: 385–397.CrossRef