Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Identifying core topics in technology and innovation management studies: a topic model approach

  • Published:
The Journal of Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study of technology and innovation management (TIM) has continued to evolve and expand with great speed over the last three decades. This research aims to identify core topics in TIM studies and explore their dynamic changes. The conventional approach, based on discrete assignments by subjective judgment with predetermined categories, cannot effectively capture latent topics from large volumes of scholarly data. Hence, this study adopts the topic model approach, which automatically discovers topics that pervade a large and unstructured collection of documents, to uncover research topics in TIM research. The 50 topics of TIM research are identified through the Latent Dirichlet Allocation model from 11,693 articles published from 1997 to 2016 in 11 TIM journals, and top 10 most popular topics in TIM research are briefly reviewed. We then explore topic trends by examining the changes in topics rankings over different time periods and identifying hot and cold topics of TIM research over the last two decades. For each of the 11 TIM journals, the areas of subspecialty and the effects of editor changes on topic portfolios are also investigated. The findings of this study are expected to provide implications for researchers, journal editors, and policy makers in the field of TIM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

The illustrative example is taken from Blei et al. (2003) with permission

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, T. J., & Sosa, M. L. (2004). 50 years of engineering management through the lens of the IEEE transactions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51(4), 391–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambos, B., & Ambos, T. C. (2011). Meeting the challenge of offshoring R&D: An examination of firm- and location-specific factors. R&D Management, 41(2), 107–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrzejewski, D., Mulhern, A., Liblit, B., & Zhu, X. (2007). Statistical debugging using latent topic models. In European conference on machine learning (pp. 6–17). Springer.

  • Antons, D., Kleer, R., & Salge, T. O. (2016). Mapping the topic landscape of JPIM, 1984–2013. In search of hidden structures and development trajectories. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(6), 726–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azagra-Caro, J. M., & Consoli, D. (2016). Knowledge flows, the influence of national R&D structure and the moderating role of public–private cooperation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(1), 152–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. F., & Rigby, J. (2006). Disseminating research in management of technology: Journals and authors. R&D Management, 36(2), 205–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyhan, B., & Cetindamar, D. (2011). No escape from the dominant theories: The analysis of intellectual pillars of technology management in developing countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(1), 103–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biemans, W., Griffin, A., & Moenaert, R. (2007). Twenty years of the journal of product innovation management: History, participants, and knowledge stock and flows. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(3), 193–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blei, D. M. (2012). Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM, 55(4), 77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blei, D. M., Griffiths, T. L., & Jordan, M. I. (2010). The nested chinese restaurant process and bayesian nonparametric inference of topic hierarchies. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 57(2), 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G., & Meissner, D. (2016). Glocal targeted open innovation: Challenges, opportunities and implications for theory, policy and practice. The Journal of Technology Transfer. doi:10.1007/s10961-016-9497-0.

  • Castellani, D., & Pieri, F. (2013). R&D offshoring and the productivity growth of European regions. Research Policy, 42(9), 1581–1594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetindamar, D., Wasti, S. N., Ansal, H., & Beyhan, B. (2009). Does technology management research diverge or converge in developing and developed countries? Technovation, 29(1), 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, C. H., Kumar, A., Motwani, J. G., Reisman, A., & Madan, M. S. (1999). A citation analysis of the technology innovation management journals. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 46(1), 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. MA: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, D. G., Lee, Y., Jung, M., & Lee, H. (2012). National characteristics and competitiveness in MOT research: A comparative analysis of ten specialty journals, 2000–2009. Technovation, 32(1), 9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Battisti, F., Ferrara, A., & Salini, S. (2015). A decade of research in statistics: A topic model approach. Scientometrics, 103(2), 413–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Prato, G., & Nepelski, D. (2014). Global technological collaboration network: Network analysis of international co-inventions. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 358–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Y. (2011). Community detection: Topological vs. topical. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 498–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durisin, B., Calabretta, G., & Parmeggiani, V. (2010). The intellectual structure of product innovation research: A bibliometric study of the journal of product innovation management, 1984–2004. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(3), 437–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ensign, P. C., Lin, C.-D., Chreim, S., & Persaud, A. (2014). Proximity, knowledge transfer, and innovation in technology-based mergers and acquisitions. International Journal of Technology Management, 66(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evangelista, R., Perani, G., Rapiti, F., & Archibugi, D. (1997). Nature and impact of innovation in manufacturing industry: Some evidence from the Italian innovation survey. Research Policy, 26(4–5), 521–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evanschitzky, H., Eisend, M., Calantone, R. J., & Jiang, Y. (2012). Success factors of product innovation: an updated meta-analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29, 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faber, J., & Hesen, A. B. (2004). Innovation capabilities of European nations: Cross-national analyses of patents and sales of product innovations. Research Policy, 33(2), 193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. P., & Kelley, M. R. (2006). The ex ante assessment of knowledge spillovers: Government R&D policy, economic incentives and private firm behavior. Research Policy, 35(10), 1509–1521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friesike, S., Widenmayer, B., Gassmann, O., & Schildhauer, T. (2015). Opening science: Towards an agenda of open science in academia and industry. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(4), 581–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Piqueres, G., Serrano-Bedia, A. M., & López-Fernández, M. C. (2016). Sector innovation capacity determinants: Modelling and empirical evidence from Spain. R&D Management, 46(1), 80–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geum, Y., Lee, S., Kang, D., & Park, Y. (2011). Technology roadmapping for technology-based product–service integration: A case study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 28(3), 128–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, T. L., & Steyvers, M. (2004). Finding scientific topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(suppl 1), 5228–5235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J., & Cloodt, M. (2003). Measuring innovative performance: Is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? Research Policy, 32(8), 1365–1379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashi, I., & Stojčić, N. (2013). The impact of innovation activities on firm performance using a multi-stage model: Evidence from the community innovation survey 4. Research Policy, 42(2), 353–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, B., Ding, Y., Tang, J., Reguramalingam, V., & Bollen, J. (2013). Mining diversity subgraph in multidisciplinary scientific collaboration networks: A meso perspective. Journal of Informetrics, 7(1), 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornik, K., & Grün, B. (2011). Topicmodels: An R package for fitting topic models. Journal of Statistical Software, 40(13), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huizingh, E. K. R. E. (2011). Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives. Technovation, 31(1), 2–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, K.-P., & Chou, C. (2013). The impact of open innovation on firm performance: The moderating effects of internal R&D and environmental turbulence. Technovation, 33(10–11), 368–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, S., Kurokawa, S., & Fujisue, K. (2006). An analysis of global R&D activities of Japanese MNCs in the US from the knowledge-based view. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53(3), 361–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, H., Qiang, M., & Lin, P. (2016). A topic modeling based bibliometric exploration of hydropower research. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 57, 226–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalluri, V., & Kodali, R. (2014). Analysis of new product development research: 1998–2009. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 21(4), 527–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson, C., & Tavassoli, S. (2016). Innovation strategies of firms: What strategies and why? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(6), 1483–1506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, T., Hong, J. S., & Lee, H. (2016). Predicting when the mass market starts to develop: The dual market model with delayed entry. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 27(3), 381–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkels, Y., & Duysters, G. (2010). Brokerage in SME networks. Research Policy, 39(3), 375–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koellinger, P. (2008). The relationship between technology, innovation, and firm performance—Empirical evidence from e-business in Europe. Research Policy, 37(8), 1317–1328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, J., Lui, S. S., & Tsang, E. W. (2016). Intrafirm knowledge transfer and employee innovative behavior: The role of total and balanced knowledge flows. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(1), 90–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. (2015). Uncovering the multidisciplinary nature of technology management: Journal citation network analysis. Scientometrics, 102(1), 51–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., Kim, C., Cho, H., & Park, Y. (2009). An ANP-based technology network for identification of core technologies: A case of telecommunication technologies. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(1), 894–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., Kim, W., Lee, H., & Jeon, J. (2016). Identifying the structure of knowledge networks in the US mobile ecosystems: Patent citation analysis. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 28(4), 411–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linton, J. D., & Thongpapanl, N. (2004). Perspective: Ranking the technology innovation management journals. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(2), 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansury, M. A., & Love, J. H. (2008). Innovation, productivity and growth in US business services: A firm-level analysis. Technovation, 28(1–2), 52–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, G. S. (2008). Mapping the invisible colleges of R&D Management. R&D Management, 38(1), 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merino, M. T. G., do Carmo, M. L. P., & Álvarez, M. V. S. (2006). 25 years of technovation: Characterisation and evolution of the journal. Technovation, 26(12), 1303–1316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalakelis, C., Varoutas, D., & Sphicopoulos, T. (2010). Innovation diffusion with generation substitution effects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(4), 541–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mu, J., Peng, G., & Love, E. (2008). Interfirm networks, social capital, and knowledge flow. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(4), 86–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phaal, R., Farrukh, C. J. P., & Probert, D. R. (2004). Technology roadmapping—A planning framework for evolution and revolution. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71(1–2), 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilkington, A., & Teichert, T. (2006). Management of technology: Themes, concepts and relationships. Technovation, 26(3), 288–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plewa, C., Korff, N., Baaken, T., & Macpherson, G. (2013). University–industry linkage evolution: An empirical investigation of relational success factors. R&D Management, 43(4), 365–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, A. L. (2007). How “tech mining” can enhance R&D management. Research-Technology Management, 50(2), 15–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qu, Z., Huang, C., Zhang, M., & Zhao, Y. (2013). R&D offshoring, technology learning and R&D efforts of host country firms in emerging economies. Research Policy, 42(2), 502–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Rodríguez, A. R., & Ruíz-Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25(10), 981–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, H., Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2014). Identifying emerging topics in science and technology. Research Policy, 43(8), 1450–1467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson, O., Rivkin, J. W., & Fleming, L. (2006). Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Research Policy, 35(7), 994–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Technology Futures Analysis Methods Working Group. (2004). Technology futures analysis: Toward integration of the field and new methods. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71(3), 287–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teichert, T., & Pilkington, A. (2006). Themes, concepts and relationships in innovation research. In Proceedings of the 15th IAMOT conference: East meets west (pp. 22–26).

  • Teng, J. T., Grover, V., & Guttler, W. (2002). Information technology innovations: General diffusion patterns and its relationships to innovation characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(1), 13–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thongpapanl, N. (2012). The changing landscape of technology and innovation management: An updated ranking of journals in the field. Technovation, 32(5), 257–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Ding, Y., Tang, J., Dong, X., He, B., Qiu, J., et al. (2011). Finding complex biological relationships in recent PubMed articles using Bio-LDA. PLoS ONE, 6(3), e17243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C.-Y., & Mathews, J. A. (2012). Knowledge flows in the solar photovoltaic industry: Insights from patenting by Taiwan, Korea, and China. Research Policy, 41(3), 524–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, K., Huang, K.-F., & Xu, E. (2014). Giving fish or teaching to fish? An empirical study of the effects of government research and development policies. R&D Management, 44(5), 484–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, E. (2014). Research dynamics: Measuring the continuity and popularity of research topics. Journal of Informetrics, 8(1), 98–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, E., Ding, Y., Milojević, S., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2012). Topics in dynamic research communities: An exploratory study for the field of information retrieval. Journal of Informetrics, 6(1), 140–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L. L. B. (2012). Aspect and entity extraction from opinion documents. In W. W. Chu (Ed.), Data mining and knowledge discover for big data: Methodologies, challenge and opportunities (pp. 1–40). Los Angeles, CA: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by both the Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning (NRF-2014R1A1A1004648, NRF-2015R1A2A2A04007359) and the Ministry of Education (NRF-2016R1D1A1A09917423, NRF-2016R1D1A1B03930729).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, 232 Gongneung-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul, 139-743, Republic of Korea

    Hakyeon Lee

  2. School of Industrial Management Engineering, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, 136-713, Republic of Korea

    Pilsung Kang

Authors
  1. Hakyeon Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pilsung Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pilsung Kang.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, H., Kang, P. Identifying core topics in technology and innovation management studies: a topic model approach. J Technol Transf 43, 1291–1317 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9561-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9561-4

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation