Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tuning knowledge ecosystems: exploring links between hotels’ knowledge structures and online government services provision

  • Published:
The Journal of Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of knowledge-based business opportunities in many economic sectors worldwide is often conceived through a silo-mentality, whereby efforts are focused in either industry or government entities in isolation. Without a systemic or holistic understanding of connections between these, any present or future project evaluation becomes either input- or output-based instead of having a comprehensive understanding of its impact. In order to address such a challenge, this empirical study focuses on the Spanish hospitality sector, which currently thrives by continuously accessing external and internal sources of knowledge, thus offering opportunities to conceptualise it as a knowledge ecosystem. Lessons learned from the Spanish hospitality sector have the potential to inform the design of online government services as part of a knowledge ecosystem. This can, in turn, yield further opportunities for innovation in the hospitality sector. A structural equation model validated by factor analysis of 130 hotels is used to assess the extent to which hotels currently benefit from online government services. This study concludes that online government services can be better fostered by nurturing external communities while also setting up internal working communities and practices. The model and its implications can also inform initiatives which seek to pursue ecosystem-oriented research and practice, as well as future policy and technology transfer initiatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. (1988). Structural modelling in practice: A review and recommended two-steps approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P. (1980). Causal models in marketing. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, S. J., & Vidgen, R. T. (2001). An evaluation of cyber-bookshops: The WebQual method. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(1), 11–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barua, A., Konana, P., Whinston, A. B., & Yin, F. (2004). An Empirical investigation of net-enabled business value. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 585–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Hansen, D. (2012). The impact of policies on government social media usage: Issues, challenges and recommendations. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 30–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bontis, N., Chua, W., & Richardson, S. (2000). Intellectual capital and the nature of business in Malaysia. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(1), 85–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadarso, F. (2005). Spain: tourism environment indicator. OECD Papers, 5(4), 85–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campanella, F., Della Peruta, M. R., & Del Giudice, M. (2013). The role of sociocultural background on the characteristics and the financing of youth entrepreneurship. An exploratory study of university graduates in Italy. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4(3), 244–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G., Alexander, J., & Geraghty, J. (2001). Service sector productivity: B2B electronic commerce as a strategic driver. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(4), 337–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G., & Rakhmatullin, R. (2014). The quadruple/quintuple innovation helixes and smart specialisation strategies for sustainable and inclusive growth in Europe and beyond. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5(2), 212–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, E. G., & McIver, S. P. (1981). Analysing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of covariance structures. In G. W. Bohrnstedt & E. F. Borgatta (Eds.), Social measurement; Current issues (pp. 65–115). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmona-Moreno, E., Céspedes-Lorente, J., & Burgos-Jimenez, J. (2004). Environmental strategies in Spanish hotels: Contextual factors and performance. The Service Industries Journal, 24(3), 101–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cegarra, J. G., Córdoba, J. R., & Moreno, J. L. (2012). E-government and citizen’s engagement with local affairs through e-websites: The case of Spanish municipalities. International Journal of Information Management, 32(5), 469–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cegarra, J. G., Dewhurst, F. W., & Briones, A. J. (2007). Factors affecting the use of e-government in the telecommunications industry of Spain. Technovation, 27(10), 595–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures for marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. (1998). Toward a knowledge context. California Management Review, 40(3), 22–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Córdoba, J. (2005). Communities and evaluation of e-government services. In E. Coakes & S. Clarke (Eds.), Encyclopedia of communities of practice in information and knowledge management (pp. 32–34). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Córdoba, J. R., & Cegarra, J. G. (2010). Beyond e-procurement: A framework to develop e-government services for small and medium enterprises (SMEs). In J. R. Córdoba & A. Ochoa-Arias (Eds.), Systems thinking and e-participation: ITC in the governance of society (pp. 154–172). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Curry, A., & Stancich, L. (2000). The intranet—An intrinsic component of strategic information management. International Journal of Information Management, 20(4), 249–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H., & Grover, V. (2001). General perspectives on knowledge management: Fostering a research agenda. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Giudice, M., & Maggioni, V. (2014). Managerial practices and operative directions of knowledge management within inter-firm networks: A global view. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(5), 841–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewhurst, F. W., & Cegarra, J. G. (2004). External communities of practice and relational capital. The Learning Organization, 11(4/5), 322–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez-Vila, T., Darcy, S., & Alén-Gonzalez, E. (2015). Competing for the disability tourism market—A comparative exploration of the factors of accessible tourism competitiveness in Spain and Australia. Tourism Management, 47, 261–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egan, G. (1994). Working the shadow side: A guide to positive behind the scenes management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, XXVII, 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, M., & Cordey-Hayes, M. (1996). Understanding the process of knowledge transfer to achieve successful technological innovation. Technovation, 16(6), 301–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Loscos, A., & González, M. J. (2014). La evolución reciente del turismo no residente en España. Boletín Económico, 4, 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, E., & Carcaba, A. (2004). Efficiency improvement through learning. International Journal of Technology Management, 27(6/7), 628–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimsley, M., & Meehan, A. (2007). e-Government information systems: Evaluation-led design for public value and client trust. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(2), 134–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F. J., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M., & Mangurian, G. E. (1987). The changing value of communications technology. Sloan Management Review, 28(2), 65–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, T. M., Pardo, T. A., & Cook, M. (2012). Creating open government ecosystems: A research and development agenda. Future Internet, 4(4), 900–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heichlinger, A. (2004). eGovernment in Europe’s regions: Approaches and progress in IST strategy, organisation and services, and the role of regional actors. Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbard, J., & Carillo, K. M. (1998). Knowledge revolution: Getting employees to share what they know is no longer a technology challenge-it’s a corporate culture challenge. Information Week, 663, 49–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irani, Z., & Love, P. (2008). Information systems evaluation: A crisis of understanding. In Z. Irani & P. Love (Eds.), Evaluating information systems: Public and private sector (pp. ix–xxxvi). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irani, Z., Love, P. E., Elliman, T., Jones, S., & Themistocleus, M. (2005). Evaluating egovernment: Learning from the experiences of two UK local authorities. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 61–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. (1982). Victims of groupthink (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, M., & Kuk, G. (2007). E-government business models for public service networks. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 3(3), 54–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (2001). LISREL 8.50. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kambil, A., Nunes, P. F., & Wilson, D. (1999). Transforming the marketspace with all-in-one markets. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 3(4), 11–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, G., & Kwak, Y. H. (2012). An open government maturity model for social mediabased public engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 492–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M., & Turban, E. (2001). A trust model for internet shopping. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6, 75–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H. F., & Lee, G. G. (2005). Impact of organizational learning and knowledge management factors on e-business adoption. Management Decision, 43(2), 171–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, M. A., Bagchi, K., & Ford, T. C. (2004). On-line shopping behavior: Cross-country empirical research. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9(1), 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, P. P., Covin, J. G., Robinson, R. B., & Herron, L. (1994). The effects of industry growth and strategic breadth on new venture performance and strategy content. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 537–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKnight, D. H., & Chervany, N. L. (2001). What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: An interdisciplinary conceptual typology. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(2), 35–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, A., Bharadwaj, S. G., & Howell, R. (1996). The quality and effectiveness of marketing strategy: Effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict in intra-organizational relationships. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24, 299–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B., & O’Day, V. (1999). Information ecologies: Using technology with heart. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nath, R., Akmanligil, M., Hjelm, K., Sakaguchi, T., & Schultz, M. (1998). Electronic commerce and the internet: Issues, problems, and perspectives. International Journal of Information Management, 18(2), 91–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of Ba: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palacios-Marqués, D., Soto-Acosta, P., & Merigó, J. M. (2015). Analyzing the effects of technological, organizational and competition factors on Web knowledge exchange in SMEs. Telematics and Informatics, 32(1), 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlou, P. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7, 69–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, L. W., Lawler, E. E., & Hackman, J. R. (1987). Ways groups influence individual work effectiveness. In R. M. Steers & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Motivation and work behaviour (4th ed., pp. 271–279). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rambøll, (2004). User satisfaction and usage survey of eGovernment services. EU: Top of the Web survey 2004. http://europa.eu.int/idabc/en/document/3819/254

  • Riggins, F. J. (1999). A framework for identifying web-based electronic commerce opportunities. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 9(4), 297–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, K., & Ricks, D. A. (1994). Goal configuration in a global industry context. Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust, R. T., & Lemon, K. N. (2001). E-service and the consumer. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 5(3), 85–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selz, D., & Schubert, P. (1997). Web assessment: A model for the evaluation and assessment of successful electronic commerce applications. International Journal of Electronic Markets, 7(3), 46–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soto-Acosta, P., Popa, S., & Palacios-Marqués, D. (2015). E-business, organizational innovation and firm performance in manufacturing SMEs: An empirical study in Spain. Technological and Economic Development of Economy,. doi:10.3846/20294913.2015.1074126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C., & Pan, S. (2003). Managing e-transformation in the public sector: An eGovernment study of the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS). European Journal of Information Systems, 12, 269–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2000). Strategies for managing knowledge assets: The role of firm structure and industrial context. Long Range Planning, 33(1), 35–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nation World Tourism Organization-UNWTO. (2015). UNWTO tourism highlights (2011 edition). http://www.e-unwto.org/doi/pdf/10.18111/9789284416899. Accessed October 12, 2015.

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., Mcdermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). A Guide to managing knowledge: Cultivating communities of practice. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Q., Chen, J., Xie, Z., Liu, J., Zheng, G., & Wang, Y. (2007). Total innovation management: A novel paradigm of innovation management in the 21st century. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(1), 9–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang, Y., & Lederer, A. L. (2003). An instrument for measuring the business benefits of e-commerce retailing. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 65–99.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Economic and Business Science, Technical University of Cartagena, Cartagena, Spain

    Juan Gabriel Cegarra-Navarro

  2. School of Management, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, UK

    José Rodrigo Córdoba-Pachón

  3. Centre for Business in Society, Coventry University, Coventry, UK

    Alexeis García-Pérez

Authors
  1. Juan Gabriel Cegarra-Navarro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. José Rodrigo Córdoba-Pachón
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alexeis García-Pérez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexeis García-Pérez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cegarra-Navarro, J.G., Córdoba-Pachón, J.R. & García-Pérez, A. Tuning knowledge ecosystems: exploring links between hotels’ knowledge structures and online government services provision. J Technol Transf 42, 302–319 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9506-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9506-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation