Skip to main content
Log in

On unique determination of domains in Euclidean spaces

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper is devoted to two new directions in developing the classical geometric subjects related to studying the problem of unique determination of closed convex surfaces by their intrinsic metrics. The first of these directions is the study of unique determination of domains (i.e., open connected sets) in Euclidean spaces by relative metrics of the boundaries of these domains. It appeared about 25–30 years ago and was developed owing to the efforts of Russian scientists. The first part of the paper (Secs. 3–7) contains an overview of the results referring to this direction.

The foundations of the second direction are presented in the second part of the paper, i.e., in Sec. 8, for the first time. This direction is closely related with the first one and consists of studying the problem of unique determination of conformal type. The main result of the section is the theorem on the unique determination of bounded convex domains by relative conformal moduli of their boundary conductors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. D. Aleksandrov, Intrinsic Geometry of Convex Surfaces [in Russian], Gostekhizdat, Moscow-Leningrad (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. A. Aleksandrov, “Isometry of domains in ℝn and the relative isometry of their boundaries,” Sib. Mat. Zh., 25, No. 3, 3–13 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. A. Aleksandrov, “Isometry of domains in ℝn and the relative isometry of their boundaries, II,” Sib. Mat. Zh., 26, No. 6, 3–8 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. A. Aleksandrov, “On domains uniquely determined by the relative metrics of their boundaries,” in: Studies in Geometry and Mathematical Analysis, Proceedings of the Institute of Mathematics of the USSR Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch [in Russian], 7, 5–19 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. A. Aleksandrov, “Unique determination of domains with non-Jordan boundaries,” Sib. Mat. Zh., 30, No. 1, 3–12 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. A. Aleksandrov, “Estimate of deformation of a strictly convex domain depending on the relative metric of its boundary,” Sib. Math. Zh., 31, No. 5, 3–9 (1990).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. V. A. Aleksandrov, “On isometry of polyhedral domains whose boundaries are locally isometric in the relative metrics,” Sib. Mat. Zh., 33, No. 2, 3–9 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. K. Borovikova, “On isometry of polygonal domains whose boundaries are locally isometric in relative metrics,” Sib. Mat. Zh., 33, No. 4, 30–41 (1992).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. F. W. Gehring and J. Vaisala, “The coefficients of quasiconformality of domains in space,” Acta Math., 114, Nos. 1–2, 1–70 (1965).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. A. P. Kopylov, “On boundary values of mappings close to isometric mappings,” Sib. Mat. Zh., 25, No. 3, 120–131 (1984).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. A. V. Kuz’minykh, “On isometry of domains whose boundaries are isometric in relative metrics,” Sib. Mat. Zh., 26, No. 3, 91–99 (1985).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. A. V. Pogorelov, Extrinsic Geometry of Convex Surfaces [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. V. Pogorelov, Unique Determination of General Convex Surfaces [in Russian], Akad. Nauk USSR (1951).

  14. G. Pólya and G. Szegő, Isoperimetric Inequalities in Mathematical Physics, Ann. Math. Stud., 27, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton (1951).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Yu. G. Reshetnyak, Spatial Mapping with Bounded Distortion [in Russian], Nauka, Novosibirsk (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yu. G. Reshetnyak, Stability Theorems in Geometry and Analysis [in Russian], S. L. Sobolev Institute of Mathematics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk (1996).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Saks, Theory of Integrals [Russian translation], Moscow (1949).

  18. L. Schwartz, Analysis [Russian translation], Vol. 2, Mir, Moscow (1972).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. E. P. Sen’kin, “Non-flexibility of convex surfaces,” Ukr. Geom. Sb., 12, 131–152 (1972).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. D. A. Trotsenko, “Unique determination of bounded domains by the metric of the boundary induced by the metric of the domain,” in: All-Union Conference on Geometry “in the Large,” Abstracts of Reports [in Russian], Institute of Mathematics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk (1987), p. 122.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Väisälä, Lectures on n-Dimensional Quasiconformal Mappings, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York (1971).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. J. Väisälä, “On quasiconformal mappings in space,” Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. A I, 298, 1–36 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yu. A. Volkov, “Estimate of the deformation of a convex surface depending on the variation of its intrinsic metric,” Ukr. Geom. Sb., Nos. 5/6, 44–69 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  24. H. Whitney, Geometric Integration Theory [Russian translation], IL, Moscow (1960).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. P. Kopylov.

Additional information

__________

Translated from Sovremennaya Matematika. Fundamental’nye Napravleniya (Contemporary Mathematics. Fundamental Directions), Vol. 22, Geometry, 2007.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kopylov, A.P. On unique determination of domains in Euclidean spaces. J Math Sci 153, 869–898 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-008-9149-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-008-9149-5

Keywords

Navigation