Skip to main content
Log in

Relativistic Bohmian Mechanics Without a Preferred Foliation

  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In non-relativistic Bohmian mechanics the universe is represented by a probability space whose sample space is composed of the Bohmian trajectories. In relativistic Bohmian mechanics an entire class of empirically equivalent probability spaces can be defined, one for every foliation of spacetime. In the literature the hypothesis has been advanced that a single preferred foliation is allowed, and that this foliation derives from the universal wave function by means of a covariant law. In the present paper the opposite hypothesis is advanced, i.e., no law exists for the foliations and therefore all the foliations are allowed. The resulting model of the universe is basically the “union” of all the probability spaces associated with the foliations. This hypothesis is mainly motivated by the fact that any law defining a preferred foliation is empirically irrelevant. It is also argued that the absence of a preferred foliation may reduce the well known conflict between Bohmian mechanics and relativity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In the relativistic formulation the symbols \(\mathbb {K}\) and \(\mathbb {B}\) are redefined.

  2. Here a world line is considered to be a subset of M, and its intersection with any hypersurface is exactly one point.

  3. This point can be better understood by means of the following analogy: in non-relativistic Bohmian mechanics the set \(\mathbb {B}\) defined in Sect. 2 is the set of the trajectories which are dynamically allowed by the guiding equation. If the guiding equation is removed as a law, the set of the allowed trajectories becomes the entire kinematic space \(\mathbb {K}\).

References

  1. Allori, V., Goldstein, S., Tumulka, R., Zanghì, N.: On the common structure of Bohmian mechanics and the Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber theory. Brit. J. Philos. Sci. 59, 353–389 (2008). arXiv:quant-ph/0603027

  2. Berndl, K., Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., Zanghì, N.: Nonlocality, Lorentz invariance, and Bohmian quantum theory. Phys. Rev. A 53, 2062–2073 (1996). arXiv:quant-ph/9510027

  3. Bohm, D., Hiley, B.J.: The Undivided Universe. Routledge, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., Münch-Berndl, K., Zanghì, N.: Hypersurface Bohm–Dirac models. Phys. Rev. A 60, 2729–2736 (1999). arXiv:quant-ph/9801070

  5. Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., Norsen, T., Struyve, W., Zanghì, N.: Can Bohmian mechanics be made relativistic? Proc. Roy. Soc. A 470, 20130699 (2013). arXiv:1307.1714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., Zanghì, N.: Quantum Physics Without Quantum Philosophy. Springer, Berlin (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., Zanghì, N.: Quantum equilibrium and the origin of absolute uncertainty. J. Statist. Phys. 67, 843-907 (1992). arXiv:quant-ph/0308039

  8. Dürr, D., Teufel, S.: Bohmian Mechanics. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Galvan, B.: Generalization of the Born rule. Phys. Rev. A 78, 042113 (2008). arXiv:0806.4935

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldstein, S.: Boltzmann’s approach to statistical mechanics. In: Bricmont, J., Dürr, D., Galavotti, M. C., Ghirardi, G., Petruccione, F., Zanghí, N. (eds.): Chance in Physics: Foundations and Perspectives, pp. 39–54. Lecture notes in Physics 574. Springer Berlin (2001). arXiv:cond-mat/0105242

  11. Goldstein, S.: Typicality and notions of probability in physics. In: Ben-Menahem, Y., Hemmo, M. (eds.) Probability in Physics, pp. 59–71. Springer, Berlin (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Holland, P.R.: The Quantum Theory of Motion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Huber, P.J.: Robust Statistics. Wiley, New York (1981)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Maudlin, T.: Space-Time in the Quantum World. In: Cushing, J.T., Fine, A., Goldstein, S. (eds.) Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shafer, G.: From Cournots principle to market efficiency. In: Touffut, J. P. (ed.) Augustin Cournot: Modelling Economics. Edward Elgar (2007) http://www.glennshafer.com

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno Galvan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Galvan, B. Relativistic Bohmian Mechanics Without a Preferred Foliation. J Stat Phys 161, 1268–1275 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-015-1369-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-015-1369-8

Keywords

Navigation