Skip to main content
Log in

2D/3D multi-phase Fresnel volume rays and applications to simultaneously update both velocity model and reflector geometry

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Seismology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Theoretically, Fresnel volume ray theory is more suitable for handling real seismic propagation problems because the traveltime depends not only on the velocity distribution along a traditional geometric ray but also on the velocity distribution within a vicinal region (referred to as first Fresnel volume, abbreviated as FFV) which embraces the geometric ray. In this study, we used an exact solution to calculate multi-phase FFV rays for both 2-D and 3-D cases and introduced a normalized coefficient to account for different contributions inside the FFV ray on the traveltimes. Furthermore, we draw a new formula to calculate the partial traveltime derivatives with respective to the velocity variations and depth changes of the reflectors and finally present a simultaneous inversion method for updating both velocity field and reflector geometry by using these multi-phase FFV rays for both in 2-D and 3-D cases. Using synthetic data examples, we compare the reconstructions of the velocity field and the reflector geometry using the FFV ray tomographic methods and the traditional ray tomography approaches. The simulated inversion results for both 2-D and 3-D cases show that the FFV ray tomographic method is advantageous over the traditional ray tomography method, especially when the ray density is relatively low. The other advantage for the FFV ray tomography method is that it can capture the coarse velocity structure and reflector geometry by starting with a low-frequency data set and then map the fine velocity structure and the detailed reflector geometry by using a high-frequency data set.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bai CY, Greenhalgh SA (2005) 3-D non-linear travel time tomography: imaging high contrast velocity anomalies. Pure Appl Geophys 162:2029–2049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai CY, Huang GJ, Zhao R (2010) 2D/3D irregular shortest-path ray tracing for multiple arrivals and its applications. Geophys J Int 183:1596–1612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai CY, Li XL, Tang XP (2011) Seismic wavefront evolution of multiply reflected, transmitted and converted phases in 2D/3D triangular cell model. J Seismol 15:637–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai CY, Li XL, Wang QL, Peng JB (2012) Multiple arrival tracking within irregular triangular or tetrahedron cell model. J Geophys Eng 9:29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai CY, Wang X, Wang CX (2013) Comparison wavefield simulation between the first- and the second-order separated wave equations through a high-order staggered-grid finite difference method. Earthq Sci 26(2):83–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai CY, Li XW, Huang GJ, Greenhalgh S (2014a) Simultaneous inversion for velocity and reflector geometry using multi-phase Fresnel volume rays. Pure Appl Geophys 171:1089–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai CY, Huang GJ, Li XW, Greenhalgh S (2014b) 3D simultaneous traveltime inversion for velocity structure, hypocenter locations and reflector geometry using multiple classes of arrivals. Pure Appl Geophys. doi:10.1007/s00024-014-0945-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Červený V, Soares JEP (1992) Fresnel volume ray tracing. Geophysics 57:902–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GJ, Bai CY, Zhu DL, Greenhalgh S (2012) 2D/3D seismic simultaneous inversion for velocity model and interface geometry using multiple classes of arrivals. Bull Seismol Soc Am 102:790–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husen S, Kissling E (2001) Local earthquake tomography between rays and waves: fat ray tomography. Phys Earth Planet Inter 123:129–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennett BLN, Sambridge M (1998) Inversion for multiple parameter classes. Geophys J Int 135:304–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo Y, Schuster GT (1991) Wave-equation traveltime inversion. Geophysics 56:645–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt RG, Goulty NR (1991) Combining wave-equation imaging with traveltime tomography to form high-resolution images from crosshole data. Geophysics 56:208–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng J, Leed A, Buddensiek M, Schuster GT (2006) Early arrival waveform tomography on near-surface refraction data. Geophysics 71:47–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurber C, Eberhart-Phillips D (1999) Local earthquake tomography with flexible gridding. Comput Geosci 25:809–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasco DW, Peterson JE, Majer EL (1995) Beyond ray tomography: wave paths and Fresnel volumes. Geophysics 60:1790–1804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wielandt E., 1987. On the validity of the ray approximation for interpreting delay time. In: Seismic tomography, edited by Nolet G., Redel Publishing Company

  • Zhou B, Greenhalgh SA, Sinadinovski C (1992) Iterative algorithm for the damped minimum norm, least-squares and constrained problem in seismic tomography. Explor Geophys 23:497–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research work was partially supported by the Doctoral Programming Research Fund of Higher Education, Chinese Ministry of Education (Project No: 20110205110010).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chao-ying Bai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bai, Cy., Li, Xw. & Huang, Gj. 2D/3D multi-phase Fresnel volume rays and applications to simultaneously update both velocity model and reflector geometry. J Seismol 19, 607–621 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-015-9484-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-015-9484-1

Keywords

Navigation