Abstract
The subsurface shear-wave velocity (Vs) is considered to be a key parameter for site characterization and assessment of earthquake hazard because of its great influence on local ground-motion amplification. Array microtremor measurements are widely used for the estimation of shear-wave velocities. Compared to other methods such as frequency-wavenumber (f-k) methods, the spatial autocorrelation (SPAC) method requires fewer sensors and thus is relatively easier to implement and gives robust estimations of shear-wave velocity profiles for depths down to a few hundred meters. The quantity derived from observed data is the SPAC coefficient, which is a function of correlation distance, frequency and phase velocity. Generally, estimation of Vs profiles is a two stage process: Estimation of the dispersion data from the SPAC coefficients and inversion of the dispersion data for shear-wave velocity structure. In this study, instead of inverting dispersion curves, a more practical approach is used; that is, observed SPAC coefficients are directly inverted for the S-wave velocities. A synthetic case and a field data application are presented to test the potential of the inversion algorithm. We obtain an iterative damped least-squares solution with differential smoothing. The differential smoothing approach constrains the change in shear-wave velocities of the adjacent layers and thus stabilizes the inversion.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aki K (1957) Space and time spectra of stationary stochastic waves, with special reference to microtremors. Bull Earthq Res Inst 35:415–456
Asten MW (2006) On bias and noise in passive seismic data from finite circular array data processed using spac methods. Geophysics 71:V153–V162
Asten MW (2009) Site shear velocity profiles interpretation from microtremor array data by direct fitting of spac curves. In: Bard PY, Chaljup E, Cornou C, Cotton F, Gueguen P (eds) 3rd international symposium on the effects of surface geology on seismic motion, vol 2. Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chaussees, Grenoble, France, pp 1069–1080
Asten MW, Dhu T, Lam N (2004) Optimized array design for microtremor array studies applied to site classification: comparison of results with scpt logs. In: 13th WCEE, p. Paper No. 2903, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Bettig B, Bard P, Scherbaum F, RIEPL J, Cotton F (2001) Analysis of dense array noise measurements using the modified spatial auto-correlation method (spac): application to the grenoble area. Boll Geofis Teor Appl 42:281–304
Capon J (1969) High-resolution frequency wavenumber spectrum analysis. Proc IEEE 57:1408–1418
Chavez-Garcia F, Rodriguez M, Stephenson W (2005) An alternative approach to the spac analysis of microtremors: exploiting stationarity of noise. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95:277–293
Cho I, Tada T, Shinozaki Y (2004) A new method to determine phase velocities of rayleigh waves from microseisms. Geophysics 69:1535–1551
Cho I, Tada T, Shinozaki Y (2006) Centerless circular array method: inferring phase velocities of rayleigh waves in broad wavelength ranges using microtremor records. J Geophys Res 111:B09,315
Claproods M, Asten MW (2009) Initial results from spatially averaged coherency, frequency-wavenumber, and horizontal to vertical spectrum ratio microtremor survey methods for site hazard study at Launceston, Tasmania. Explor Geophys 40:132–142
Foti S, Comina C, Socco DBLV (2009) Non-uniqueness in surface-wave inversion and consequences on seismic site response analyses. Soil Dyn Earthqu Eng 29:982–993
Henstridge JD (1979) A signal processing method for circular arrays. Geophysics 44:179–184
Herrmann B, Ammon CJ (2004) Computer programs in seismology, surface waves, receiver functions, and crustal structure, version 3.30
Köhler A, Ohrnberger M, Scherbaum F, Wathelet M (2007) Assessing the reliability of the modified three-component spatial autocorrelation technique. Geophys J Int 168:779–796
Kudo K, Kanno T, Okada H, Ozel O, Erdik M (2002) Site-specific issues for strong ground motions during the Kocaeli, Turkey, earthquake of 17 August 1999, as inferred from array observations of microtremors and aftershocks. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:448–465
Ohori M, Nobata A, Wakamatsu K (2002) A comparison of esac and fk methods of estimating phase velocity using arbitrarily shaped microtremor arrays. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:2323–2332
Okada H (2003) The microseismic survey method. Geophysical Monograph Series No. 12, Society of Exploration Geophysicists of Japan, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, translated by Koya Suto
Okada H (2006) Theory of efficient array observations of microtremors with special reference to the spac method. Explor Geophys 37:73–85
Roberts J, Asten M (2004) Resolving a velocity inversion at the geotechnical scale using the microtremor (passive seismic) survey method. Explor Geophys 35:14–18
Schwab FA, Knopoff L (1972) Methods in computational physics, chap. In: Bolt BA (ed) Fast surface wave and free mode computations. Academic Press, New York, New York, pp 87–180
Tada T, Cho I, Shinozaki Y (2009) New circular-array microtremor techniques to infer love-wave phase velocities. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:2912–2926
Wathelet M, Jongmans D, Ohrnberger M (2005) Direct inversion of spatial autocorrelation curves with the neighborhood algorithm. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95:1787–1800
Xia J, Miller R, Park C (1999) Estimation of near-surface shear-wave velocity by inversion of Rayleigh waves. Geophysics 64:691–700
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kocaoğlu, A.H., Fırtana, K. Estimation of shear wave velocity profiles by the inversion of spatial autocorrelation coefficients. J Seismol 15, 613–624 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-011-9239-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-011-9239-6