Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of Religious Values in Decisions About Genetics and the Public’s Health

  • Philosophical Exploration
  • Published:
Journal of Religion and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The latest health care legislation, which promotes prevention and health screening, ultimately depends for its success on recognition of people’s values concerning the technologies being employed, not just the interventions’ technical virtues. Values concerning the deterministic nature of a condition and what groups should be targeted rest on a sense of what is morally, often religiously right in a given health circumstance. This paper looks at a number of leading-edge case examples—breast cancer genetic screening and family decision-making, and newborn screening and biobanks—in examining how the choices made at the individual, family, and societal levels rest on faith in a higher source of efficacy and moral perspectives on the measures that can be taken. Qualitative responses expressing people’s attitudes toward these technologies underscore the importance of considering faith-based values in individual decisions and collective policies on their use. These examples are considered in the context of the historic interplay between science and religion and recent definitions and models of health which incorporate physical, emotional, and social elements, and most importantly, are expanding to incorporate the religious and spiritual values domains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, N. B. (1998). Levels of analysis in health science: A framework for integrating sociobehavioral and biomedical research. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 840(1), 563–576.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. B. (1999). Solving the puzzle of socioeconomic status and health: The need for integrated, multilevel, interdisciplinary research. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 896(1), 302–312.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, P. M., Bloom, B., Nahin, R. L. (2008). Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults and children: United States, 2007. Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics.

  • Bonham, V. L., Citrin, T., Modell, S. M., Franklin, T. H., Bleicher, E. W. B., & Fleck, L. M. (2009). Community-based dialogue: Engaging communities of color in the United States’ genetics policy conversation. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 34(3), 325–359.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, D. R. (2000). An ethic for health promotion: Rethinking the sources of human well-being. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Public Health and Community Genomics (CPHCG), Genetic Alliance. (2011). Priorities for public health genomics 2012-2017. Stakeholder consultation, priorities conference report, September 2011. Ann Arbor, MI: CPHCG. http://genomicsforum.org/files/geno_report_WEB_w_RFI_1122rev.pdf. Accessed 4/1/13.

  • Center for the Advancement of Community Based Public Health (CACBPH). (1999). Excerpts from history of the Center for the Advancement of Community Based Public Health, 1997–1999. Durham, NC: CACBPH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chissell, J. T. (1996). Pyramids of power: An ancient African centered approach to optimal health. Baltimore, MD: Positive Perceptions Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrysler, D., McGee, H., Bach, J., Goldman, E., & Jacobson, P. D. (2011). The Michigan BioTrust for Health: Using dried bloodspots for research to benefit the community while respecting the individual. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 39(Suppl S1), 98–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas County v. Anaya, Supreme Court of Nebraska (2005). No. S-03-1446. Mar 25, 2005. http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ne-supreme-court/1369636.html. Accessed 6/25/12.

  • Dubos, R. (1959). Mirage of health: Utopias, progress, and biological change. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duquette, D., Langbo, C., Bach, J., & Kleyn, M. (2012). Michigan BioTrust for Health: Public support for using residual dried blood spot samples for health research. Public Health Genomics, 15(3–4), 146–155.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grazi, R. V., & Wolowelsky, J. B. (1992). Preimplantation sex selection and genetic screening in contemporary Jewish law and ethics. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 9(4), 318–322.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haque, A. (2004). Psychology from the Islamic perspective: Contributions of early Muslim scholars and challenges to contemporary Muslim psychologists. Journal of Religion and Health, 43(4), 357–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine, Committee on Assessing Interactions Among Social, Behavioral, and Genetic Factors in Health. (2006). Genes, behavior, and the social environment. Washington, D.C: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine, Committee on Assuring the Health of the Public in the 21st century. (2002). The future of the public’s health in the 21st century. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.

  • Institute of Medicine, Committee on Educating Public Health Professionals for the 21st century. (2003). Who will keep the public healthy? Educating public health professionals in the 21st century. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.

  • Karow, J. (2009). At least $145 M in FY’09 NIH stimulus funding goes to sequencing: Disease-focused studies dominate. http://recovery.nih.gov/Stories/ViewStory.aspx?id=107. Accessed 4/25/13.

  • Koenig, H. G., McCullough, M. E., & Larson, D. B. (2001). Handbook of religion and health. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krejci-Papa, M. (2005). Soulful reasoning. Science & Spirit. www.columbia.edu/cu/biology/faculty/pollack/publications/talks/Science&Spirit_11-05.pdf. Accessed 9/28/12.

  • Life Sciences & Society (LSS). (2006). How the life sciences may influence my behavior or the behavior of others. When faith meets science: An Evolving dialogue on new choices and new technologies discussion series. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modell, S. M. (2007). Genetic and reproductive technologies in the light of religious dialogue. Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science, 42(1), 163–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modell, S. M. (2010). Aristotelian influence in the formation of medical theory. The European Legacy: Toward New Paradigms, 15(4), 409–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modell, S. M., Kardia, S. L. R., Citrin, T., & King, S. B. (2013). The ecological model in genetics and religion. In G. Simpson & S. Payne (Eds.), Religion and ethics (pp. 99–122). Happauge, New York: Nova Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offit, K., & Thom, P. (2010). Ethicolegal aspects of cancer genetics. In B. Pasche (Ed.), Cancer genetics (pp. 1–14). New York: Springer Science.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, E. A., Robins, T. G., Israel, B. A., Brakefield-Caldwell, W., Edgren, K. K., & Wilkins, D. J. (2005). Developing and implementing guidelines for dissemination: The experience of the community action against asthma project. In B. A. Israel, E. Eng, A. J. Schulz, & E. A. Parker (Eds.), Methods in community-based participatory research for health (pp. 285–306). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, P. W., Jr, Royal, C., & Kardia, S. L. R. (2007). Genetic and social environment interactions and their impact on health policy. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery, 15(Suppl 1), S95–S98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, F. P., Mathews, H. L., & Witek-Janusek, L. (2003). Psycho-endocrine-immune response to mindfulness-based stress reduction in individuals infected with the human immunodeficiency virus: A quasiexperimental study. Journal of Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 9(5), 688–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, E. M. (2009). A qualitative exploration of the community partner experience in a faith-based breast cancer educational intervention. Health Education Research, 24(5), 760–771.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosner, F. (2002). The life of Moses Maimonides, a prominent Medieval physician. Einstein Quarterly Journal of Biology and Medicine, 19(3), 125–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberg, K. H., & Rutkin, A. B. (1998). Toward a framework of mutualism: The Jewish community in genetics research. Community Genetics, 1(3), 148–153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sarton, G. (1975). Introduction to the history of science (Vol. 1). New York: R.E. Krieger Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. D., Hughes, C., Roth, J., Main, D., Peshkin, B. N., Isaacs, C., et al. (2000). Spiritual faith and genetic testing decisions among high-risk breast cancer probands. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 9, 381–385.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seeskin, K. (2010). Maimonides. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/maimonides. Accessed 7/26/12.

  • Smith, A. D. (2012). The genetic complexity of cancer: Cancer centers take varying approaches to solving the puzzle. Targeted Therapy News, Sep, 1–8. www.targetedhc.com/publications/targeted-therapy-news/2012/September-2012. Accessed 4/25/13.

  • Warren, R. C., & Modell, S. M. (2006). Vital dimensions: An inquiry into the ultimate foundations of optimal health. Ultimate Reality and Meaning: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Philosophy of Understanding, 29(1–2), 78–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wizemann, T., Berger, A. C., & Institute of Medicine roundtable on translating genomic-based research for health. (2010). The value of genetic and genomic technologies. Washington, D.C: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Hts., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2029, USA

    Stephen M. Modell, Toby Citrin, Susan B. King & Sharon L. R. Kardia

Authors
  1. Stephen M. Modell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Toby Citrin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Susan B. King
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sharon L. R. Kardia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen M. Modell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Modell, S.M., Citrin, T., King, S.B. et al. The Role of Religious Values in Decisions About Genetics and the Public’s Health. J Relig Health 53, 702–714 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-013-9814-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-013-9814-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation