Abstract
Two self-paced reading experiments using a paraphrase decision task paradigm were performed to investigate how sentence complexity contributed to the relative clause (RC) attachment preferences of speakers of different working memory capacities (WMCs). Experiment 1 (English) showed working memory effects on relative clause processing in both offline RC attachment preferences and in online reading time measures, but no effects of syntactic complexity. In Experiment 2 (Korean), syntactic complexity due to greater distance between integrating heads, as measured by the dependency locality theory (Gibson in Cognition 68:1–76, 1998), significantly increased the proportion of attachment to NP1. However, no effects of working memory were found. The difference in results between English and Korean is proposed to be due to head-directionality effects. The results of our study support the conclusion that working memory-based accounts provide a better explanation than previous language-dependent accounts for differences in RC attachment preferences. We propose that previous language dependent-accounts of cross-linguistic differences in RC processing have overlooked the interaction between individual WMC and a language’s general structure, which is a central factor in RC attachment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brysbaert M., Mitchell D. C. (1996) Modifier attachment in sentence parsing: Evidence from Dutch. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 49A: 664–695
Caplan D., Waters G. (1999) Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 77–126
Carreiras M., Clifton C. (1999) Another word on parsing relative clauses: Eyetracking evidence from Spanish and English. Memory Cognition 27(5): 826–833
Conway A. R. A., Kane M. J., Bunting M. F., Hambrick D. Z., Wilhelm O., Engle R. W. (2005) Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin Review 12(5): 769–786
Cuetos F., Mitchell D. C. (1988) Cross-linguistic difference in parsing: Restrictions on the late-closure strategy in Spanish. Cognition 30: 73–105
Cuetos F., Mitchell D. D., Corely M. M. B. (1996) Parsing in different languages. In: Carreiras M., Garcia-Albea J. E., Sebastian-Galles N. (Eds.), Language processing in Spanish. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 145–187
Ehrlich, K., Fernandez, E., Fodor, J. D., Stenshoel, E., & Vinereanu, M. (1999). Low attachment of relative clauses: New data from Swedish, Norwegian, and Romanian. Poster presented at the 12th annual CUNY conference on human sentence processing.
Felser C., Marinis T., Clahsen H. (2003) Children’s processing of ambiguous sentences: A study of relative clause attachment. Language Acquisition: A Journal of Developmental Linguistics 11: 127–163
Frazier L., Clifton C. (1996) Construal. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Frenck-Mestre C., Pynte J. (2000) Resolving syntactic ambiguity: Cross-linguistic differences?. In: Vincenzi M., Lombardo V. (Eds.), Cross-linguistic perspectives on language processing. Kluwer, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp 119–148
Gibson E. (1998) Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependency. Cognition 68: 1–76
Gibson E. (2000) The Dependency Locality Theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In: Miyashita Y., Marantz A., O’Neil W. (Eds.), Image, language, brain. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 95–126
Gibson E., Pearlmutter N., Canseco-Gonzánlez E., Hickok G. (1996) Recency preference in the human sentence processing mechanism. Cognition 59: 23–59
Hogg R. V., Craig A. T. (2005) Introduction to mathematical statistics (5th ed.). Macmillan, New York
Jun S.-A. (2003) Prosodic phrasing and attachment preferences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32: 219–249
Just M. A., Carpenter P. A. (1992) A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review 99: 122–149
Kamide Y., Mitchell D. C. (1997) Relative clause attachment: Nondeterminism in Japanese parsing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 26(2): 247–254
King J., Just M. A. (1991) Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language 30: 580–602
Konieczny L., Hemforth B. (2000) Modifier attachment in German: Relative clauses and prepositional phrase. In: Kennedy A., Pynte J. (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 517–528
Lee D., Kweon S. (2004) A sentence processing study of relative clause in Korean with two attachment sites. Discourse and Cognition 11: 126–141
MacDonald M. C., Just M. A., Carpenter P. A. (1992) Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity. Cognitive Psychology 24(1): 56–98
Mendelsohn, A., & Pearlmutter, N. J. (1999, March). Individual differences in relative clause attachment ambiguities. Poster presented at the 12th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, City University of New York.
Miyamoto, E. T. (1998). Relative clause attachment in Brazilian Portuguese. Unpublished manuscript, Massachussetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Omaki, A. (2005). Working memory and relative clause attachment in first and second language processing. MA Thesis, Department of Second Language Studies, University of Hawaii.
Pynte J. (1998) The time course of attachment decisions: Evidence from French. In: Hillert D. (Ed.), Sentence processing: A crosslinguistic perspective. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 227–245
Papadopoulou D., Clahsen H. (2003) Parsing strategies in L1 and L2 sentence processing: A study of relative clause attachment in Greek. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25: 501–528
Rayner K., Pollatsek A. (1989) The psychology of reading. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Swets B., Desmet T., Hambrick D. Z., Ferreira F. (2007) The role of working memory in syntactic ambiguity resolution: A psychometric approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology 136: 64–81
Traxler J. M. (2007) Working memory contributions to relative clause attachment processing: A hierarchical linear modeling analysis. Memory Cognition 35(5): 1107–1121
Warren T., Gibson E. (2002) The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity. Cognition, 85: 79–112
Ziardegi, E. G., Carreiras, M., & Laka, I. (2004). Bilingual sentence processing: relative clause attachment in Basque and Spanish. Poster presented at the 17th annual CUNY conference on human sentence processing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, J.H., Christianson, K. Sentence Complexity and Working Memory Effects in Ambiguity Resolution. J Psycholinguist Res 42, 393–411 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-012-9224-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-012-9224-4