Abstract
This paper presents a quantitative approach for measuring pH-controlled protein aggregation using dielectric spectroscopy. The technique is demonstrated through two aggregation experiments, the first between β-lactoglobulin (β-Lg) and hen lysozyme (HENL) and the second between bovine serum albumin (BSA) and HENL. In both experiments, the formation of aggregates is strongly dependent on the solution pH and is clearly indicated by a decrease in the measured permittivity when the second protein is added. A quantifiable lower-bound on the ratio of proteins involved in the aggregation process is obtained from the permittivity spectra. Lower-bound aggregation ratios of 83 % for β-Lg/HENL at pH 6.0 and 48 % for BSA/HENL at pH 9.2 were consistent with turbidity measurements made on the same solutions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- β-Lg:
-
Beta-lactoglobulin
- BSA:
-
Bovine serum albumin
- EP:
-
Electrode polarization
- DI:
-
De-ionized
- DS:
-
Dielectric spectroscopy
- HENL:
-
Hen lysozyme
- PDB:
-
Protein data bank
References
Cametti C, Marchetti S, Gambi C, Onori G (2011) J Phys Chem B 115:7144–7153
Chi EY, Krishnan S, Randolph TW, Carpenter JF (2003) Pharmaceut Res 20:1325–1336
Choi I, Huh YS, Erickson D (2012) Microfluid Nanofluid (12):663–669
Cole KS, Cole RH (1941) J Chem Phys (9):341–351
Debye P (1929) Polar molecules. Chemical Catalog Company Inc, New York
Demeule B, Palais C, Machaidze G, Gurny R, Arvinte T (2009) Mabs 1:142–150
Desfougeres Y, Croguennec T, Lechevalier V, Bouhallab S, Nau F (2010) J Phys Chem B 114:4138–4144
Dong AC, Prestrelski SJ, Allison SD, Carpenter JF (1995) J Pharmaceut Sci 84:415–424
Georgalis Y, Starikov EB, Hollenbach B, Lurz R, Scherzinger E, Saenger W, Lehrach H, Wanker EE (1993) Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 95:6118–6121
Gordon JC, Myers JB, Folta T, Shoja V, Heath LS, Onufriev A (2005) Nucl Acids Res 33:W368–W371
Grant EH, Sheppard RJ, South GP (1978) Dielectric behaviour of biological molecules in solution. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Helms LR, Wetzel R (1996) J Mol Biol 257:77–86
Howell NK, Yeboah NA, Lewis DFV (1995) Int J Food Sci Technol 30:813–824
Kaatze U, Feldman Y (2006) Meas Sci Tech 17:R17–R35
Kendrick BS, Cleland JL, Lam X, Nguyen T, Randolph TW, Manning MC, Carpenter JF (1998) J Pharmaceut Sci 87:1069–1076
Kerwin BA, Heller MC, Levin SH, Randolph TW (1998) J Pharmaceut Sci 87:1062–1068
Knowles TPJ, Shu W, Huber F, Lang HP, Gerber C, Dobson CM, Welland ME (2008) Nanotech 19:384007
Kuehner DE, Engmann J, Fergg F, Wernick M, Blanch HW, Prausnitz JM (1999) J Phys Chem B 103:1368–1374
MacKenzie H (1971) Milk proteins: chemistry and molecular biology, vol 2. Academic Press, New York
Mahler H, Jiskoot W (2011) Analysis of aggregates and particles in protein pharmaceuticals. Wiley, Hoboken NJ
Mahler HC, Friess W, Grauschopf U, Kiese S (2009) J Pharmaceut Sci 98:2909–2934
Majhi PR, Ganta RR, Vanam RP, Seyrek E, Giger K, Dubin PL (2006) Langmuir 22:9150–9159
Malleo D, Nevill JT, van Ooyen A, Schnakenberg U, Lee LP, Morgan H (2010) Rev Sci Instrum 81:016104
Mazzeo BA, Chandra S, Mellor BL, Arellano J (2010) Rev Sci Instrum 81:125103
Mellor B, Kellis N, Mazzeo B (2011) In: 2011 annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, EMBC, Boston, MA, pp 3660–3663
Mellor BL, Cruz Cortes E, Busath DD, Mazzeo BA (2011) J Phys Chem B 115:2205–2213
Mellor BL, Cruz Cortes E, Khadka S, Mazzeo BA (2012) Rev Sci Instrum 83:015110
Nigen M, Croguennec T, Renard D, Bouhallab S (2007) Biochem 46:1248–1255
Oleinikova A, Sasisanker P, Weingartner H (2004) J Phys Chem B 108:8467–8474
Parbhu A, Lin H, Thimm J, Lal R (2002) Peptides 23:1265–1270
Peters T (1985) Adv Prot Chem 37:161–245
Ringler P, Schulz GE (2003) Science 302:106–109
Ross CA, Poirier MA (2004) Nature Med 10:S10–S17
Suherman PM, Taylor PM, Smith G (2002) Pharmaceut Res 19:337–344
Takashima S (1964) Biochim Biophys Acta Biophys Subj 79:531–538
Tartaglia GG, Cavalli A, Pellarin R, Caflisch A (2004) Prot Sci 13:1939–1941
Tomski SJ, Murphy RM (1992) Arch Biochem Biophys 294:630–638
van der Linden E, Venema P (2007) Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 12:158–165
Wolf M, Gulich R, Lunkenheimer P, Loidl A (2012) Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteomics 5:723–730
Xie W, Wan OW, Chung KKK (2010) Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis 1802:935–941
Yong YH, Foegeding EA (2009) J Agric Food Chem 58:685–693
Zhang SG (2003) Nat Biotech 21:1171–1178
Acknowledgments
We thank Shiul Khadka and Bryson Lanterman for initial construction of measurement cells and preliminary experiments. BLM was supported by a MIT Lincoln Laboratory Fellowship Award. This work was supported by funds from the BYU College of Engineering and Technology and the Office of Research & Creative Activities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix Detailed Experimental Protocol
Appendix Detailed Experimental Protocol
1.1 β-Lg/HENL Experiment
-
1.
Cell rinsed once with ethanol followed by three rinses with DI water and then dried in air. Air calibration measurement taken.
-
2.
(A) Added 60 μl of DI water to cell. Water calibration measurement taken after stabilization.
-
3.
(B) Removed 18 μl. Added 18 μl of 10 mg/ml β-Lg in DI water resulting in 3 mg/ml β-Lg in DI water.
-
4.
(C) Added 6 μl of 10 mg/ml HENL in DI water resulting in 0.91 mg/ml HENL and 2.73 mg/ml β-Lg in DI water.
-
5.
(D) Removed all liquid from cell by pipettor. Added 60 μl of 5 mM HCl. Cell recalibrated.
-
6.
(E) Removed 36 μl. Added 18 μl of 10 mM HCl. Added 18 μl of 10 mg/ml β-Lg in DI water resulting in 3 mg/ml β-Lg in 5 mM HCl.
-
7.
(F) Removed 6 μl. Added 6 μl of 10 mM HCl. Added 6 μl of 10 mg/ml HENL in DI water resulting in 0.91 mg/ml HENL and 2.45 mg/ml β-Lg in 5 mM HCl.
-
8.
Cell rinsed with and immersed into DI water for storage.
1.2 BSA/HENL Experiment
-
1.
Cell rinsed once with ethanol followed by three rinses with DI water and then dried in air. Air calibration measurement taken.
-
2.
(G) Added 60 μl of DI water to cell. Water calibration measurement taken.
-
3.
(H) Removed 18 μl. Added 18 μl of 10 mg/ml BSA in DI water resulting in 3 mg/ml BSA in DI water.
-
4.
(I) Added 6 μl of 10 mg/ml HENL in DI water resulting in 0.91 mg/ml HENL and 2.73 mg/ml BSA in DI water.
-
5.
(J) Removed all liquid from cell by pipettor. Added 60 μl of 1 mM NaOH.
-
6.
(K) Removed 36 μl. Added 18 μl of 2 mM NaOH. Added 18 μl of 10 mg/ml BSA in DI water resulting in 3 mg/ml BSA in 1 mM NaOH.
-
7.
(L) Removed 6 μl. Added 6 μl of 2 mM NaOH. Added 6 μl of 10 mg/ml HENL in DI water resulting in 0.91 mg/ml HENL and 2.45 mg/ml BSA in 1 mM NaOH.
-
8.
Cell rinsed with and immersed into DI water for storage.
1.3 Additional Experimental Notes
-
1.
The Agilent 4294A Impedance Analyzer had the following settings: measurement parameters \(\rightarrow\) Cp-G, sweep type \(\rightarrow\) log, sweep direction \(\rightarrow\) down, oscillator strength \(\rightarrow\) 500 mV, bandwidth \(\rightarrow\) 4, start frequency \(\rightarrow\) 40 Hz, stop frequency \(\rightarrow\) 110 MHz, number of points \(\rightarrow\) 601.
-
2.
Each time liquid was added into the measurement cell, the entire solution was mixed by repeated actuation of the pipettor for about 10 s.
-
3.
Permittivity measurements when adding proteins and mixing were unstable. These sweeps (1–2 per step) were discarded from Figs. 1 and 2.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mellor, B.L., Wood, S.J. & Mazzeo, B.A. Quantitation of pH-induced Aggregation in Binary Protein Mixtures by Dielectric Spectroscopy. Protein J 31, 703–709 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10930-012-9450-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10930-012-9450-5