Abstract
Practitioners of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling routinely employ various software packages that enable them to fit differential equation based mechanistic or empirical models to biological/pharmacological data. The availability and choice of different analytical tools, while enabling, can also pose a significant challenge in terms of both, implementation and transferability. A package has been developed that addresses these issues by creating a simple text-based format, which provides methods to reduce coding complexity and enables the modeler to describe the components of the model based on the underlying physiochemical processes. A Perl script builds the system for multiple formats (ADAPT, MATLAB, Berkeley Madonna, etc.), enabling analysis across several software packages and reducing the chance for transcription error. Workflows can then be built around this package, which can increase efficiency and model availability. As a proof of concept, tools are included that allow models constructed in this format to be run with MATLAB both at the scripting level and through a generic graphical application that can be compiled and run as a stand-alone application.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lipscomb JC, Haddad S, Poet T, Krishnan K (2012) Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models in toxicity testing and risk assessment. In: Johanson G (ed) In technologies for toxicity. Springer, New York, pp 76–95
Abuqayyas L, Balthasar JP (2012) Application of knockout mouse models to investigate the influence of FcγR on the tissue distribution and elimination of 8C2, a murine IgG1 monoclonal antibody. Int J Pharm 439:8–16. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.09.042
Jones HM, Dickins M, Youdim K, Gosset JR, Attkins NJ, Hay TL et al (2012) Application of PBPK modelling in drug discovery and development at Pfizer. Xenobiotica 42:94–106. doi:10.3109/00498254.2011.627477
Iyengar R, Zhao S, Chung S-W, Mager DE, Gallo JM (2012) Merging systems biology with pharmacodynamics. Sci Transl Med 4:126–227. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3003563
Luu KT, Kraynov E, Kuang B, Vicini P, Zhong W-Z (2013) Modeling, simulation, and translation framework for the preclinical development of monoclonal antibodies. AAPS J 15:551–558. doi:10.1208/s12248-013-9464-8
Chien JY, Friedrich S, Heathman MA, Alwis DP, Sinha V (2005) Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and the stages of drug development: role of modeling and simulation. AAPS J 7:544–559. doi:10.1208/aapsj070355
Lavé T, Parrott N, Grimm HP, Fleury A, Reddy M (2007) Challenges and opportunities with modelling and simulation in drug discovery and drug development. Xenobiotica 37:1295–1310. doi:10.1080/00498250701534885
Rosenthal RE (2006) GAMS—a user’s guide. GAMS Development Corporation, Washington, DC
Harrold JM, Parker RS (2009) Clinically relevant cancer chemotherapy dose scheduling via mixed-integer optimization. Comput Chem Eng 33:2042–2054. doi:10.1016/j
Fritzson P (2011) Introduction to modeling and simulation of technical and physical systems with modelica. Wiley, Hoboken
Hucka, M (2010) The systems biology markup language (SBML): language specification for level 3 version 1 core. http://sbml.org/Documents/Specifications. Accessed 24 November 3013
Moodie, S L, Swat, M J, Kristensen, N R, Le Novère, N (2013). PharmML: the pharmacometrics markup language. Drug disease model resource. http://www.ddmore.eu/pharmml. Accessed 24 November 2013
Holford, N (2013). Model Coding Language Specification Draft 5 version 0.8. Drug Disease Model Resource. http://www.ddmore.eu/mdl. Accessed 24 November 2013
D’Argenio DZ, Schumitzky A, Wang X (2009) ADAPT 5 user’s guide: pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic systems analysis software. Biomedical simulations resource. University of Southern California, Los Angeles
Macey R, Oster G, Zahnley T (2000) Berkeley Madonna user’s guide, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology. University of California, Berkeley
Maiwald T, Timmer J (2008) Dynamical modeling and multi-experiment fitting with PottersWheel. Bioinformatics 24:2037–2043. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn350
Lavielle M, Mentré F (2007) Estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters of saquinavir in HIV patients with the MONOLIX software. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 34:229–249. doi:10.1007/s10928-006-9043-z
Chan PLS, Jacqmin P, Lavielle M, McFadyen L, Weatherley B (2010) The use of the SAEM algorithm in MONOLIX software for estimation of population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic-viral dynamics parameters of maraviroc in asymptomatic HIV subjects. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 38:41–61. doi:10.1007/s10928-010-9175-z
Mager DE (2006) Target-mediated drug disposition and dynamics. Biochem Pharmacol 72:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2005.12.041
Dayneka NL, Garg V, Jusko WJ (1993) Comparison of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 21:457–478. doi:10.1007/BF01061691
Dirks NL, Meibohm B (2010) Population pharmacokinetics of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Clin Pharmacokinet 49:633–659. doi:10.2165/11535960-000000000-00000
Vieira P, Rajewsky K (1988) The half-lives of serum immunoglobulins in adult mice. Eur J Immunol 18:313–316. doi:10.1002/eji.1830180221
Shah DK, Betts AM (2012) Towards a platform PBPK model to characterize the plasma and tissue disposition of monoclonal antibodies in preclinical species and human. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 39:67–86. doi:10.1007/s10928-011-9232-2
Beal SL, Sheiner LB, Boeckmann A, Bauer RJ (2009) NONMEM user’s guides. (1989–2009). Icon Development Solutions, Ellicott City
Acknowledgments
We would like to express our appreciation to Indranil Bhattacharya, Itrat Harrold, Ryan Nolan, Robert Parker, and Yulia Vugmeyster for critical review of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harrold, J.M., Abraham, A.K. Ubiquity: a framework for physiological/mechanism-based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model development and deployment. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 41, 141–151 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10928-014-9352-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10928-014-9352-6