Skip to main content

Pharmacometrics: A Quantitative Decision-Making Tool in Drug Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quantitative Methods in Pharmaceutical Research and Development

Abstract

Pharmacometrics—pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) modeling and simulation—has been used to inform drug development decisions for more than two decades and has gained increasing support from the pharmaceutical industry, academia, and regulatory agencies. With the regulatory encouragement on model-informed drug development and the recognition of high-impact emerging applications, pharmacometric analysis currently plays an important role throughout a drug’s life cycle, from the early translational stage to the confirmatory phase 3 and regulatory approval, and even into the post-marketing trials. This chapter provides a brief introduction to pharmacometric analysis approaches including pharmacokinetic models, PK/PD models, physiologically based pharmacokinetic models, quantitative systems pharmacology models, and model based meta-analysis models. Aspects of model development are also discussed such as software, modeling work flow, and major model components, with a focus on population modeling analysis. Finally, case studies are provided to highlight the broad applications of this evolving science in drug development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ariens EJ (ed.) (1964) Molecular Pharmacology: The mode of action of biologically active compounds. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beal S, Sheiner LB (1984) NONMEM I Users Guide. Technical Report, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, University of California at San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonate PL (ed.) (2011) Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling and simulation, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chien JY, Friedrich S, Heathman MA, et al. (2005) Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and the stages of drug development: role of modeling and simulation. AAPS J 7:e544-59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford M (2016) The when and why of quantitative systems pharmacology. AAPS News Magazine. December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csajka C, Verotta D (2006) Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling: history and perspectives. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 33:227-79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dayneka NL, Garg V, Jusko WJ (1993) Comparison of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 21:457-78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Winter W, Dunne A, Woot deTrixhe X, et al. (2016) Dynamic population PK/PD modeling and simulation supports similar efficacy in HbA1c response with once or twice-daily dosing of canagliflozin. Br J Clin Pharmacol doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13180.

  • Ette EI, Williams PJ (2007) Pharmacometrics: impacting drug development and pharmacotherapy. In: Ette EI, Williams PJ (eds.) Pharmacometrics: The science of quantitative pharmacology, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey, p 1-21.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • EFPIA MID3 Workgroup (2016) Good practices in model-informed drug discovery and development: practice, application, and documentation. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 5:93-122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EMA (2008) Reporting the results of population pharmacokinetic analyses. http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/regulation/general/general_content_001284.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac0580032ec5. Assessed 28 Jan 2017.

  • EMA (2016) Guideline on the qualification and reporting of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling and simulation. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2016/07/WC500211315.pdf. Assessed 28 Jan 2017.

  • FDA (1999) Guidance for Industry: Population Pharmacokinetics. Food and Drug Administration. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidances/UCM072137.pdf. Assessed 28 Jan 2017.

  • FDA (2003) Guidance for Industry: Exposure-Response Relationships—Study Design, Data Analysis, and Regulatory Applications. Food and Drug Administration. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm072109.pdf. Assessed 28 Jan 2017

  • FDA (2004) Challenge and Opportunity on the Critical Path to New Products. Food and Drug Administration. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/ScienceResearch/SpecialTopics/CriticalPathInitiative/CriticalPathOpportunitiesReports/UCM113411.pdf. Assessed 28 Jan 2017

  • Forschungsinstitut B, Dettlti L, Freerksen E, et al. (1962) Pharmakokinetik und Arzneimitteldosierung (Pharmacokinetics and Drug Dosage). Kolloquium im Forschungsinstitut Borstel vom 25. bis 27. Oktober 1962. In: Antibiot Chemother. vol. 12, Karger Publishers, Basel, Switzerland (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabrielsson J, Weiner D (2007) Pharmacokinetic concepts. In: Gabrielsson J, Weiner D (eds.). Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data analysis: concepts and applications, 4th Edition. Swedish Pharmaceutical Press, Stockholm, Sweden, p 11-224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibaldi M, Levy G (1976) Pharmacokinetics in clinical practice: 1. Concepts. JAMA 235:1864–1867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobburu JV, Lesko LL (2009) Quantitative disease, drug, and trial models. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 49: 291-301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobburu JV (2013) Intermediate PKPD Modeling. Course: PHAR747, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holford NHG, Hale M, Ko H, et al. (1999) Simulation in drug development: good practices. Originally published by the Centre for Drug Development Science http://holford.fmhs.auckland.ac.nz/docs/simulation-in-drug-development-good-practices.pdf. Assessed 28 Jan 2017

  • Hu C, Wasfi Y, Zhuang Y, et al. (2014) Information contributed by meta-analysis in exposure-response modeling: application to phase 2 dose selection of guselkumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 4:239-50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutmacher MM, Kowalski KG (2015) Covariate selection in pharmacometric analyses: a review of methods Br J Clin Pharmacol 79:132-47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones H, Rowland-Yeo K (2013) Basic concepts in physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling in drug discovery and development. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 14:e63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jusko WJ, Ko HC (1994) Physiologic indirect response models characterize diverse types of pharmacodynamic effects. Clin Pharmacol Ther 56:406-19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson MO, Savic RM (2007) Diagnosing model diagnostics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 82:17-20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimko H, Duffull S (eds.) (2003) Simulation of clinical trials in drug development. Marcel-Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimko H, Peck C (eds.). (2010) Clinical trial simulations: applications & trends. AAPS Advances in the Pharmaceutical Sciences Series, Springers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee JY, Garnett CE, Gobburu JV, et al. (2011) Impact of pharmacometric analyses on new drug approval and labelling decisions: a review of 198 submissions between 2000 and 2008. Clin Pharmacokinet 50:627–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy G (1966) Kinetics of pharmacologic effects. Clin Pharm Ther 7:362–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mager DE, Kimko H (eds.) (2016) Systems pharmacology and pharmacodynamics. AAPS Advances in the Pharmaceutical Sciences Series, Springers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandema JW, Gibbs M, Boyd RA, et al. (2011) Model-based meta-analysis for comparative efficacy and safety: application in drug development and beyond. Clin Pharmacol Ther 90:766-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mould DR, Upton RN (2012) Basic concepts in population modeling, simulation, and model-based drug development. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 26:e6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mould DR, Upton RN (2013) Basic concepts in population modeling, simulation, and model-based drug development-part 2: introduction to pharmacokinetic modeling methods. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 17:e38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagashima R, O’Reilly R, Levy G (1969) Kinetics of pharmacologic effects in man: the anticoagulant action of warfarin. Clin Pharmacol Ther 10:22–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson SC, Bockbrader H, Boyd RA, et al. (2000) Impact of population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analyses on the drug development process: experience at Parke-Davis. Clin Pharmacokinet 38:449-59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang S, Rowland M (1977) Hepatic clearance of drugs. I. Theoretical considerations of a “well-stirred” model and a “parallel tube” model. Influence of hepatic blood flow, plasma and blood cell binding, and the hepatocellular enzymatic activity on hepatic drug clearance. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 5:625-53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck C, Barr WH, Benet LZ, et al. (1992) Opportunities for integration of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and toxicokinetics in rational drug development. Clin Pharm Ther 51: 465-473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reigner BG, Williams PE, Patel IH, et al. (1997) An evaluation of the integration of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles in clinical drug development. Experience within Hoffmann La Roche. Clin Pharmacokinet 33:142-52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowland M, Benet L (1982) Pharmacometrics: a new journal section. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 10:349–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma A, Jusko WJ (1998) Characteristics of indirect pharmacodynamic models and applications to clinical drug responses. Br J Clin Pharmacol 45: 229–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheiner L, Rosenberg B, Melmon K (1972) Modeling of individual pharmacokinetics for computer-aided drug dosage. Comput Biomed Res 5:441–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheiner LB, Stanski DR, Vozeh S, et al. (1979) Simultaneous modeling of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: application to d-tubocurarine. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 25:358-71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheiner L (1997) Learning versus confirming in clinical drug development. Clin Pharmacol Ther 61:275–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segre G (1968) Kinetics of interaction between drugs and biological system. Farmaco Sci 23:907–918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorger PK, Allerheiligen SRB, Abernethy DR, et al. (2011) Quantitative and systems pharmacology in the postgenomic era: new approaches to discovering and understanding therapeutic drugs and mechanisms. An NIH White Paper from the QSP Workshop Group, http://www.nigms.nih.gov/Training/Documents/SystemsPharmaWPSorger2011.pdf. Assessed 28 Jan 2017

  • Teorell T (1937) Kinetics of distribution of substances administered to the body. The extravascular modes of administration. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 57:205–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upton RN, Mould DR (2014) Basic concepts in population modeling, simulation, and model-based drug development: part 3-introduction to pharmacodynamic modeling methods. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 2:e88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicini P, van der Graaf PH (2013) Systems pharmacology for drug discovery and development: paradigm shift or flash in the pan? Clin Pharmacol Ther 93:379-81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner JG (1981) History of pharmacokinetics. Pharmacol Ther 12:537-62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widmark E, Tandberg J (1924) Uber die bedingungen fur die akkumulation indifferenter narkoliken theoretische bereckerunger. Biochem Z 147:358–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Hartmann G, Gibson C, et al. (2014) Utility of physiologically based pharmacokinetics in pediatric drug development. In: Abstracts of the 5th American Conference of Pharmacometrics. Las Vegas, NV, 12-15 October 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Li YF, Zhang D, et al. (2016) Characterizing class-specific exposure-viral load suppression response of HIV antiretrovirals using a model-based meta-analysis. Clin Transl Sci 9:192-200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou H (2003) Pharmacokinetic strategies in deciphering atypical drug absorption profiles. J Clin Pharmacol. 43:211-27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan Xu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Xu, Y., Kimko, H. (2020). Pharmacometrics: A Quantitative Decision-Making Tool in Drug Development. In: Marchenko, O.V., Katenka, N.V. (eds) Quantitative Methods in Pharmaceutical Research and Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48555-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics