Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Burden of Sickness Absence Due to Chronic Disease in the Dutch Workforce from 2007 to 2011

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction Chronic diseases are associated with productivity loss costs due to sickness absence. It is not always clear, however, which chronic diseases in particular are involved with how many sickness days and associated costs. Objective To determine the prevalence, additional days of sickness absence, and associated costs of chronic diseases among the Dutch working population from 2007 to 2011. Methods Prevalence of chronic diseases and additional days of sickness absence were derived from the Netherlands Working Conditions Survey (NWCS) from 2007 to 2011. The cost of each sickness absence day was based on linked personal income data. We used multiple regression analysis to derive the unconfounded additional days of sickness absence due to each chronic disease. Results Annually, approximately 37 % of the Dutch working population reported some type of chronic physical or psychological disease. No clinically relevant changes in prevalence of specific chronic diseases were observed in the studied period, nor in the number of additional sickness absence days or associated costs. The national financial burden due to sickness absence associated with chronic musculoskeletal disorders amounted to €1.3 billion annually. Conclusions Chronic diseases result in substantial productivity loss due to sickness absence. Given the ageing population, the proposed increase in the state pension age and an increase in sedentary lifestyle and obesity, the prevalence of chronic diseases may be expected to rise. Coordinated efforts to maintain and improve the health of the working population are necessary to minimize socioeconomic consequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Making work count—How health technology assessment can keep Europeans in work. Fit for Work Coalition; 2012.

  2. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks (ESENER): managing safety and health at work. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  3. World report on disability. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.

  4. Burdorf A. Do costs matter in occupational health? Occup Environ Med. 2011;68:707–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kessler RC, Akiskal HS, Ames M, Birnbaum H, Greenberg P, Hirschfeld RMA, Jin R, Merkangas KR, Wang PS. The prevalence and effects of mood disorders on work performance in a nationally representative sample of US workers. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:1561–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Smit F, Cuijpers P, Oostenbrink J, Batelaan N, de Graaf R, Beekman A. Costs of nine common mental disorders: implications for curative and preventive psychiatry. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2006;9:193–200.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. De Graaf R, Tuithof M, van Dorsselaer S, ten Have M. Comparing the effects on work performance of mental and physical disorders. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012;47:1873–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. DiBonaventura MD, Paulose-Ram R, Su J, McDonald M, Zou KH, Wagner JS, Shah H. The burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among employed adults. Int J Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2012;7:211–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. DiBonaventura MD, Gupta S, McDonald M, Sadosky A. Evaluating the health and economic impact of osteoarthritis pain in the workforce: results from the National Health and Wellness Survey. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:83.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lambeek LC, van Tulder MW, Swinkels IC, Koppes LL, Anema JR, van Mechelen W. The trend in total cost of back pain in the Netherlands in the period 2002 to 2007. Spine. 2011;36:1050–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Van den Bossche SNJ, Koppes LLJ, Granzier J, de Vroome EMM, Smulders PGW. Nationale Enquête Arbeidsomstandigheden 2007: Methodologie en globale resultaten [Netherlands Working Conditions Survey 2007: Methodology and overview of results]. Hoofddorp: TNO; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Koppes LLJ, de Vroome EMM, Mol M, Janssen B, van Zwieten MHJ, van den Bossche SNJ. Nationale Enquête Arbeidsomstandigheden 2011: Methodologie en globale resultaten [Netherlands Working Conditions Survey 2011: Methodology and overview of results]. Hoofddorp: TNO; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Van den Brakel M, Moonen L. Procesbeschrijving van het inkomenspanelonderzoek [Description of processing the income panel research]. Voorburg/Heerlen: CBS (Statistics Netherlands); 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hakkaart-van Roijen L, Tan SS, Bouwmans CAM. Handleiding voor kostenonderzoek: Methoden en standaard kostprijzen voor economische evaluaties in de gezondheidszorg [Manual for cost-research: Methods and standard cost prices for economic evaluations in health care]. Rotterdam: Erasmus University; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Taylor & Francis; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Alonso J, Petukhova M, Vilagut G, Chatterji S, Heeringa S, Üstün TB, et al. Days out of role due to common physical and mental conditions: results from the WHO World Mental Health surveys. Mol Psychiatry. 2011;16:1234–46.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. De Vroome EMM, Koppes LLJ, Smulders PGW, Bossche SNJ. Verzuimmeting via zelfrapportage en registratie: Verschillen tussen de Nationale Enquête Arbeidsomstandigheden en de Nationale Verzuim Statistiek [Measuring absence through self-reports and registers: differences between the Netherlands Working Conditions Survey and the National Sickness Absence Register]. TSG. 2010;88:71–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Koopmanschap M, Burdorf A, Lötters F. Work absenteeism and productivity loss at work. In: Loisel P, Anema JR, editors. Handbook of work disability: prevention and management. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 31–41.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang W, Dall TM, Halder P, Gallo P, Kowal SL, Hogan PF. Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2012. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:1033–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kotlarz H, Gunnarsson CL, Fang H, Rizzo JA. Osteoarthritis and absenteeism costs: evidence from US national survey data. J Occup Environ Med. 2010;52:263–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Steenbeek R, Hooftman W, Geuskens G, Wevers C. Objectiveren van gezondheidsgerelateerde non-participatie en de vermijdbare bijdrage van de gezondheidszorg hieraan [Objectifying health related non participation and the corresponding avoidable contribution of health care]. Hoofddorp: TNO; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Prins R. Sickness absence and disability: an international perspective. In: Loisel P, Anema JR, editors. Handbook of work disability: prevention and management. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 3–14.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, Thomson B, Graetz N, Margono C, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384:766–81.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fransson EI, Nyberg ST, Heikkilä K, Alfredsson L, Bjorner JB, Borritz M, et al. Job strain and the risk of stroke: an individual-participant data meta-analysis. Stroke. 2015;46:557–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was possible through part of government funds assigned to TNO (Grant Number 1300019215). We thank Statistics Netherlands (CBS) for supplying us with the data on the individual income of all NWCS respondents.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Compliance with Ethical standards

According to the Research involving Human Subjects Act (WMO), our study was not subject to an ethics review and did not need to include informed consent from the subjects, since the data were obtained from questionnaires that participants returned on a voluntary basis for scientific use and the results were presented anonymously at the group level. This study fulfilled all the requirements for test subject anonymity, and adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ernest M. M. de Vroome.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Vroome, E.M.M., Uegaki, K., van der Ploeg, C.P.B. et al. Burden of Sickness Absence Due to Chronic Disease in the Dutch Workforce from 2007 to 2011. J Occup Rehabil 25, 675–684 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-015-9575-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-015-9575-4

Keywords

Navigation