Abstract
We analyze the control by electromagnetic fields of quantum systems with infinite dimensional Hilbert space and a discrete spectrum. Based on recent mathematical results, we rigorously show under which conditions such a system can be approximated in a finite dimensional Hilbert space. For a given threshold error, we estimate this finite dimension in terms of the used control field. As illustrative examples, we consider the cases of a rigid rotor and of a harmonic oscillator.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C. Brif, R. Chakrabarti, H. Rabitz, New. J. Phys. 12, 075008 (2010)
W.S. Warren, H. Rabitz, M. Dahleh, Sciences 259, 1581 (1993)
D.D’Alessandro, Introduction to Quantum Control and Dynamics, Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Science Series (Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, 2008)
M. Shapiro, P. Brumer, Principles of Quantum Control of Molecular Processes (Wiley, New-York, 2003)
S. Rice, M. Zhao, Optimal Control of Quantum Dynamics (Wiley, New-York, 2000)
V. Ramakrishna et al., Phys. Rev. A 51, 960 (1995)
C. Altafini, Phys. Rev. A 70, 062321 (2004)
S.G. Schirmer, H. Fu, A.I. Solomon, Phys. Rev. A 63, 063410 (2001)
S.G. Schirmer, A.I. Solomon, J.V. Leahy, J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 35, 8551 (2002)
G.M. Huang, T.J. Tarn, J.W. Clark, J. Math. Phys. 24, 2608 (1983)
G. Turinici, On the controllability of bilinear quantum systems, in Mathematical Models and Methods for Ab Inition Quantum Chemistry, vol. 74, Lecture Notes in Chemistry, ed. by M. Defranceschi, C. Le Bris (Springer, Berlin, 2000)
D.J. Tannor, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics: A Time-dependent Perspective (University Science Books, Sausalito, 2007)
D.M. Reich, M. Ndong, C.P. Koch, J. Chem. Phys. 136, 104103 (2012)
Y. Maday, G. Turinici, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 8191 (2003)
W. Zhu, J. Botina, H. Rabitz, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 1953 (1998)
A. Messiah, Quantum Mechanics (Dunod, Paris, 1995)
M.H. Levitt, Spin Dynamics: Basis of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (Wiley, New York, 2008)
R.R. Ernst, Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions, International Series of Monographs on Chemistry (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1990)
N. Khaneja, R. Brockett, S.J. Glaser, Phys. Rev. A 63, 032308 (2001)
M. Lapert, Y. Zhang, M. Braun, S.J. Glaser, D. Sugny, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 083001 (2010)
E. Assémat, M. Lapert, Y. Zhang, M. Braun, S.J. Glaser, D. Sugny, Phys. Rev. A 82, 013415 (2010)
Y. Zhang, M. Lapert, M. Braun, D. Sugny, S.J. Glaser, J. Chem. Phys. 134, 054103 (2011)
M. Reed, B. Simon, Funtional Analysis, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics (Academic Press, London, 1980)
T. Chambrion, P. Mason, M. Sigalotti, U. Boscain, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 26, 329 (2009)
M. Mirrahimi, P. Rouchon, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 49, 745 (2004)
T. Chambrion, Automatica 48, 2040 (2012)
N. Boussaïd, M. Caponigro, T. Chambrion, Weakly-coupled systems in quantum control. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 58(9), 2205–2216 (2013)
T.H. Gronwall, Ann. Math. 20, 4 (1919)
H. Stapelfeldt, T. Seideman, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 543 (2003)
M. Spanner, E.A. Shapiro, M. Ivanov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 093001 (2004)
T. Seideman, E. Hamilton, Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 52, 289 (2006)
M. Leibscher, I.S. Averbukh, H. Rabitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 213001 (2003)
J. Salomon, C.M. Dion, G. Turinici, J. Chem. Phys. 123, 144310 (2005)
M. Lapert, D. Sugny, Phys. Rev. A 85, 063418 (2012)
E. Assémat, L. Attar, M.-J. Penouilh, M. Picquet, A. Tabard, Y. Zhang, S.J. Glaser, D. Sugny, Chem. Phys. 405, 71 (2012)
J. Werschnik, E.K.U. Gross, J. Phys. B 40, 175 (2007)
M. Lapert, R. Tehini, G. Turinici, D. Sugny, Phys. Rev. A 78, 023408 (2008)
Acknowledgments
Financial supports from the Conseil Régional de Bourgogne and the QUAINT coordination action (EC FET-Open) are gratefully acknowledged. E. Assémat is supported by the Koshland Center for basic Research
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Estimate of the dimension of the finite dimensional Hilbert space
Appendix: Estimate of the dimension of the finite dimensional Hilbert space
We give in the appendix some indications about the way to compute a precise estimate of the dimension of the finite dimensional Hilbert space in the case of a planar rotor.
For some \(\epsilon \), we find \(N\) according to (14) and we consider the dynamical evolution of the system in the subspace \(\mathcal {H}^{(N)}\), which is governed by Eq. (7):
Assuming that the initial state is \(|\phi _1\rangle \), a general solution reads as follows:
Replacing \(|\psi _N(t)\rangle \) in the integral term of Eq. (16) by its value given by the same equation (16), we get:
For a fixed number \(p\ge 2\), we repeat this operation \(p-1\) times, which leads to:
We next compute the projection of this state onto \(|\phi _{p+1}\rangle \). Using the tridiagonal structure of the operator \(H_1^{(N)}\), one deduces that the first two terms of the right-hand side of Eq. (18) have no contribution. One finally arrives at:
where the integrand contains \(p\) factors \(H_1^{(N)}\). A majorization of this term is given by:
For the planar rotor, we denote by \(c\) the absolute value of the coupling constant. Straightforward computations give
Indeed, the product \(H|\psi \rangle \), with \(H\) tridiagonal, can always be written as \(H|\psi \rangle = a|\psi _1\rangle + b|\psi _2\rangle + c|\psi _3\rangle \), where \(|\langle \psi _i |\psi _i\rangle |\le | \langle \psi |\psi \rangle |\) and \((a,b,c)\) are the maxima of the nonzero diagonals. In our case, one of the diagonal is void so \(\Vert H |\psi \rangle \Vert \le 2c\). We can also show by induction that
which leads to
The estimate (23) is valid in \(\mathcal {H}^{(N)}\). If one considers the actual solution of the infinite dimensional system in \(\mathcal {H}\), one yields, for \(\epsilon \) and \(N\) chosen according to (14),
Estimate (24) is correct for every \(\varepsilon >0\). Letting \(\varepsilon \) goes to zero, one finally gets
Estimate (25) can in turn be used to refine the condition (14). Since \(c=1/2\), we obtain:
which gives an estimate of the probability of transitions outside the subspace \(\mathcal {H}^{(p)}\). If \(K\le (\varepsilon p !)^{(1/p)}\), then this probability is lower than \(\varepsilon \). In addition, in the case \(K^{p+1}<2\varepsilon p!\), we get \(\frac{K^p}{p!}<\frac{2\varepsilon }{K}\) and
i.e. the dynamics in the finite subspace \(\mathcal {H}^{(p)}\) is close to \(\varepsilon \) to the exact dynamics.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Assémat, E., Chambrion, T. & Sugny, D. On the control by electromagnetic fields of quantum systems with infinite dimensional Hilbert space. J Math Chem 53, 374–385 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10910-014-0429-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10910-014-0429-7