Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding Satisfaction: An Analysis of the Meaning Potential of the Word “Satisfaction” in Everyday Norwegian Language

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Happiness Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Satisfaction with life is often considered to be a component of or a synonym for subjective well-being. However, the meaning of “satisfaction” is rarely discussed in the scientific literature. The purpose of this study was to examine the meaning potential of the Norwegian term for satisfaction (tilfredshet). A conceptual analysis was conducted based on the qualitative responses of 276 Norwegian adults to the question “What is satisfaction for you?” Based on principles of thematic analysis, text data units were examined to develop a framework of recurrent themes and superordinate categories. The analysis demonstrated that the word “satisfaction” in everyday Norwegian language does not unequivocally point toward a unitary, clear-cut affective or evaluative phenomenon. Instead, its meaning potential was found to include material, physiological and interpersonal conditions, activities, internal psychological states, and circumstances and contexts of well-being, connected by temporal and causal assumptions. In addition to hedonic understandings, eudaimonic and processual conceptualizations of satisfaction were identified. Findings support a conceptual co-existence of satisfaction as satisficing (conditions evaluated as good enough) and as more optimal fulfilment (conditions evaluated as good). Further qualitative studies of conceptual understanding across cultural contexts and languages are recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405. doi:10.1177/146879410100100307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften. (2015). Digitale Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache (Digital dictionary of the German language). http://www.dwds.de. Accessed 2 Aug 2015.

  • Bishop, M. A. (2015). The good life: Unifying the philosophy and psychology of well-being. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blakar, R. M. (1979). Language as a means of social power. In R. Rommetveit & R. M. Blakar (Eds.), Studies of language, thought and verbal communication (pp. 109–146). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concerns. Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlquist, E., Nafstad, H. E., Blakar, R. M., Ulleberg, P., Delle Fave, A., & Phelps, J. M. (2017). Well-being vocabulary in media language: An analysis of changing word usage in Norwegian newspapers. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(2), 99–109. doi:10.1080/17439760.2016.1163411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlquist, E., Ulleberg, P., Delle Fave, A., Nafstad, H. E., & Blakar, R. M. (2016). Everyday understandings of happiness, good life, and satisfaction: Three different facets of well-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life. doi:10.1007/s11482-016-9472-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, T. L. (1981). Happiness, contentment, and the good life. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 62(4), 378–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casasanto, D., & Lupyan, G. (2015). All concepts are ad hoc concepts. In E. Margolis & S. Laurence (Eds.), The conceptual mind: New directions in the study of concepts (pp. 543–566). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2003). Grounded theory. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 81–110). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, K., & Nicolson, P. (2002). The meaning of ‘satisfaction’ for people with dermatological problems: Reassessing approaches to qualitative health psychology research. Journal of Health Psychology, 7(5), 615–629. doi:10.1177/1359105302007005681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, W. (1981). A theory of happiness. American Philosophical Quarterly, 18(2), 111–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Caprona, Y. (2013). Norsk etymologisk ordbok. Oslo: Kagge forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delle Fave, A., Brdar, I., Freire, T., Vella-Brodrick, D., & Wissing, M. P. (2011). The eudaimonic and hedonic components of happiness: Qualitative and quantitative findings. Social Indicators Research, 100(2), 185–207. doi:10.1007/s11205-010-9632-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delle Fave, A., Brdar, I., Wissing, M. P., Araujo, U., Castro Solano, A., Freire, T., et al. (2016). Lay definitions of happiness across nations: The primacy of inner harmony and relational connectedness. Frontiers in Psychology. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00030.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delle Fave, A., Brdar, I., Wissing, M. P., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2013a). Sources and motives for personal meaning in adulthood. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(6), 517–523. doi:10.1080/17439760.2013.830761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delle Fave, A., Wissing, M., Brdar, I., Vella-Brodrick, D., & Freire, T. (2013b). Cross-cultural perceptions of meaning and goals in adulthood: Their roots and relations with happiness. In A. S. Waterman (Ed.), The best within us: Positive psychology perspectives on eudaimonia (pp. 227–247). Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., Schimmack, U., & Helliwell, J. F. (2009). Well-being for public policy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Ng, W., Harter, J., & Arora, R. (2010). Wealth and happiness across the world: Material prosperity predicts life evaluation, whereas psychosocial prosperity predicts positive feeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 52–61. doi:10.1037/a0018066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, P. (2014). Happiness by design. Change what you do, not how you think. New York: Hudson Street Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, P., & Metcalfe, R. (2012). Measuring subjective wellbeing: Recommendations on measures for use by national governments. Journal of Social Policy, 41(02), 409–427. doi:10.1017/S0047279411000833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, L. (1997). Addressing problems of conceptualization and construct validity in researching teachers’ job satisfaction. Educational Research, 39(3), 319–331. doi:10.1080/0013188970390307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, V. (2006). Lexical concepts, cognitive models and meaning-construction. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(4), 491–534. doi:10.1515/COG.2006.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, F. (2010). What is this thing called happiness?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. (2002). Conceptualization: On theory and theorizing using grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 23–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, I. (2004). Human well-being and social structures: Relating the universal and the local. Global Social Policy, 4(3), 289–311. doi:10.1177/1468018104047489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. (1986). Well-being: Its meaning, measurement and moral importance. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of everyday relations. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huta, V., & Waterman, A. S. (2014). Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: Developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 1425–1456. doi:10.1007/s10902-013-9485-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (1989). What is a concept, that a person may grasp it? Mind and Language, 4(1–2), 68–102. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.1989.tb00243.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashdan, T. B., Biswas-Diener, R., & King, L. A. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: The costs of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(4), 219–233. doi:10.1080/17439760802303044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashdan, T. B., & Steger, M. F. (2011). Challenges, pitfalls, and aspirations for positive psychology. In K. M. Sheldon, T. B. Kashdan, & M. F. Steger (Eds.), Designing positive psychology: Taking stock and moving forward (pp. 9–24). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. J., & Diamond, D. M. (2002). The stressed hippocampus, synaptic plasticity and lost memories. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(6), 453–462. doi:10.1038/nrn849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjell, O. N. E., Daukantaitė, D., Hefferon, K., & Sikström, S. (2016). The harmony in life scale complements the satisfaction with life scale: Expanding the conceptualization of the cognitive component of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 126(2), 893–919. doi:10.1007/s11205-015-0903-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J., Ritchie, J., Ormston, R., & Morrell, G. (2003). Generalising from qualitative research. In J. Ritchie, J. Lewis, C. M. Nicholls, & R. Ormston (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (pp. 347–366). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machado, A., & Silva, F. J. (2007). Toward a richer view of the scientific method: The role of conceptual analysis. American Psychologist, 62(7), 671–681. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.62.7.671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malterud, K. (2012). Systematic text condensation: A strategy for qualitative analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 40(8), 795–805. doi:10.1177/1403494812465030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1985). Multiple discrepancies theory (MDT). Social Indicators Research, 16(4), 347–413. doi:10.1007/BF00333288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morling, B., & Evered, S. (2006). Secondary control reviewed and defined. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 269–296. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13–22. doi:10.1177/160940690200100202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moscovici, S. (2000). The history and actuality of social representations. In S. Moscovici & G. Duveen (Eds.), Social representations: Explorations in social psychology (pp. 120–155). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nafstad, H. E., Carlquist, E., & Blakar, R. M. (2012). Towards a psychology for a humankind and a planet under multiple threats: A social psychology of ideology. In J. P. Valentim (Ed.), Societal approaches in social psychology (pp. 61–80). Bern: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R. L. (2010). Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the consumer. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The satisfaction with life scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(2), 137–152. doi:10.1080/17439760701756946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker, J. W., Mehl, M. R., & Niederhoffer, K. G. (2003). Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 547–577. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polkinghorne, D. E. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 137–145. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisenzein, R., & Rudolph, U. (2008). The discovery of common-sense psychology. Social Psychology, 39(3), 125–133. doi:10.1027/1864-9335.39.3.125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, M., & Veenhoven, R. (2013). Contentment and affect in the estimation of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 110(2), 415–431. doi:10.1007/s11205-011-9952-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rommetveit, R. (1968). Words, meanings and messages: Theory and experiments in psycholinguistics. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rommetveit, R. (2003). On the role of “a psychology of the second person” in studies of meaning, language, and mind. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 10(3), 205–218. doi:10.1207/s15327884mca1003_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J. R., & Snyder, S. S. (1982). Changing the world and changing the self: A two-process model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 5–37. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85–109. doi:10.1177/1525822x02239569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., Huta, V., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 139–170. doi:10.1007/s10902-006-9023-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 13–39. doi:10.1007/s10902-006-9019-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semin, G. R. (2011). Culturally situated linguistic ecologies and language use. In M. J. Gelfand, C.-Y. Chiu, & Y.-Y. Hong (Eds.), Advances in culture and psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 217–249). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smedslund, J. (2009). The mismatch between current research methods and the nature of psychological phenomena: What researchers must learn from practitioners. Theory & Psychology, 19(6), 778–794. doi:10.1177/0959354309345648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, A. (Ed.). (2010). Oxford dictionary of English (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suikkanen, J. (2011). An improved whole life satisfaction theory of happiness. International Journal of Wellbeing, 1(1), 149–166. doi:10.5502/ijw.v1i1.6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, L. W. (1996). Welfare, happiness and ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatarkiewicz, W. (1966). Happiness and time. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 27(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. L., Olds, T., Boshoff, K., & Lane, A. E. (2010). Children’s conceptualization of the term ‘satisfaction’: Relevance for measuring health outcomes. Child: Care, Health and Development, 36(5), 663–669. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2010.01105.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiberius, V., & Hall, A. (2010). Normative theory and psychological research: Hedonism, eudaimonism, and why it matters. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(3), 212–225. doi:10.1080/17439761003790971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, P. K., & Krizek, R. L. (2006). A meaning-centered approach to customer satisfaction. Management Communication Quarterly, 20(2), 115–147. doi:10.1177/0893318906288276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2009). Cultural psychology today: Innovations and oversights. Culture & Psychology, 15(1), 5–39. doi:10.1177/1354067x08101427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1996). Developments in satisfaction-research. Social Indicators Research, 37(1), 1–46. doi:10.1007/BF00300268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vittersø, J., Biswas-Diener, R., & Diener, E. (2005). The divergent meanings of life satisfaction: Item response modeling of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in Greenland and Norway. Social Indicators Research, 74(2), 327–348. doi:10.1007/s11205-004-4644-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, W. (2007). Vernacular science knowledge: Its role in everyday life communication. Public Understanding of Science, 16(1), 7–22. doi:10.1177/0963662506071785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wangensteen, B. (Ed.). (2005). Bokmålsordboka [Dictionary of Norwegian Bokmål]. Oslo: Kunnskapsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Hilde Breck, André de Brisis and Agnete Falck Revdal for their invaluable help in collecting and registering data for this study. Funding was provided by University of Oslo.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1094, 0317, Blindern, Oslo, Norway

    Erik Carlquist, Hilde E. Nafstad & Rolv M. Blakar

Authors
  1. Erik Carlquist
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hilde E. Nafstad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rolv M. Blakar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik Carlquist.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carlquist, E., Nafstad, H.E. & Blakar, R.M. Understanding Satisfaction: An Analysis of the Meaning Potential of the Word “Satisfaction” in Everyday Norwegian Language. J Happiness Stud 19, 939–959 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9854-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9854-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation