Skip to main content
Log in

Multiple plans and memory performance: results of a randomized controlled trial targeting fruit and vegetable intake

  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To test whether forming and memorizing more action plans has larger effects than generating fewer plans. In a randomized controlled trial with five intervention groups and one control group, 478 participants were asked to form one, two, three, four, or five action plans, or to complete questionnaires only (control group). One week later, behavior change was measured and participants of the intervention groups completed a free recall task. Outcome measures are daily intake of fruit and vegetables as well as recall of plans. Fruit and vegetable intake increased with higher numbers of plans, and was significantly larger in groups that formed four (d = 0.36) or five plans (d = 0.48) as compared to controls. The sum of recalled plans reflected the number of generated plans, but was unrelated to behavior change. Generating multiple plans benefits behavior change, but to be implemented they need not be recalled.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. An a priori sample size estimation resulted in a sample size of n = 77 participants per condition (d = 0.59; Gollwitzer & Sheeran, 2006; α = .05, power = .95, dropout = 30%).

  2. A PDF-version of the intervention is available upon request from the first author.

  3. Sum of recalled situations divided by the number of plans formed in the respective intervention, see Table 1.

  4. Analyses were run as two-tailed tests in an intention-to-treat framework with missing data being imputed using the EM algorithm (Enders, 2001).

  5. Analyses using data from the longitudinal sample only (n = 362; i.e., excluding dropouts) replicated the differential behavior change across groups, F(5, 354) = 2.48, P = .03.

  6. For comparisons between those who formed 2 and 3 plans, and between those with 4 and 5 plans, P < .05.

References

  • Chapman, J., Armitage, C. J., & Norman, P. (2009). Comparing implementation intention interventions in relation to young adults’ intake of fruit and vegetables. Psychology & Health, 24, 317–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A.-L., Jaudas, A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2008). Number of cues influence the cost of remembering to remember. Memory & Cognition, 36, 149–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, M. A., & Armitage, C. J. (2006). Effects of implementation intentions on the self-reported frequency of drivers’ compliance with speed limits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12, 108–117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Godin, G., Sheeran, P., Conner, M., & Germain, M. (2008). Asking questions changes behavior: Mere measurement effects on frequency of blood donation. Health Psychology, 27, 179–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, P. M., & Brandstätter, V. (1997). Implementation intentions and effective goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 186–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 70–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippke, S., Ziegelmann, J. P., & Schwarzer, R. (2004). Initiation and maintenance of physical exercise: Stage-specific effects of a planning intervention. Research in Sports Medicine, 12, 221–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luszczynska, A., Tryburcy, M., & Schwarzer, R. (2007). Improving fruit and vegetable consumption: A self-efficacy intervention compared to a combined self-efficacy and planning intervention. Health Education Research, 22, 630–638.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Michie, S., Dormandy, E., & Marteau, T. (2004). Increasing screening uptake amongst those intending to be screened: The use of action plans. Patient Education and Counseling, 55, 218–222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milne, S., Orbell, S., & Sheeran, P. (2002). Combining motivational and volitional interventions to promote exercise participation: Protection motivation theory and implementation intentions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 7, 163–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S. B., & DeShon, R. P. (2002). Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychological Methods, 7, 105–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prestwich, A., Perugini, M., & Hurling, R. (2010). Can implementation intentions and text messages promote brisk walking? A randomized trial. Health Psychology, 29, 40–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. E., & Bayen, U. J. (2004). A multinomial model of event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 756–777.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sniehotta, F. F., Schwarzer, R., Scholz, U., & Schüz, B. (2005). Action planning and coping planning for long-term lifestyle change: Theory and assessment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 565–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stadler, G., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Oettingen, G. (2010). Intervention effects of information and self-regulation on eating fruits and vegetables over 2 years. Health Psychology, 29, 274–283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steptoe, A., Perkins-Porras, L., McKay, C., Rink, E., Hilton, S., & Cappuccio, F. P. (2003). Psychological factors associated with fruit and vegetable intake and with biomarkers in adults from a low-income neighborhood. Health Psychology, 22, 148–155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Osch, L., Lechner, L., Reubsaet, A., & de Vries, H. (2010). From theory to practice: An explorative study into the instrumentality and specificity of implementation intentions. Psychology & Health, 25, 351–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, T. L. (2006). Getting things done: Self-regulatory processes in goal pursuit. Social Psychological Review, 8, 2–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiedemann, A. U., Lippke, S., Reuter, T., Ziegelmann, J. P., & Schüz, B. (2011a). The more the better? The number of plans predicts health behaviour. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 3, 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiedemann, A. U., Lippke, S., Reuter, T., Ziegelmann, J. P., & Schwarzer, R. (2011b). How planning facilitates behaviour change: Additive and interactive effects of a randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 42–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2003). Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases: WHO technical report (Vol. 916). Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Jana Richert and Milena Koring for their help in conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amelie U. Wiedemann.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 51 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wiedemann, A.U., Lippke, S. & Schwarzer, R. Multiple plans and memory performance: results of a randomized controlled trial targeting fruit and vegetable intake. J Behav Med 35, 387–392 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-011-9364-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-011-9364-2

Keywords

Navigation