Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of fatigue induced damage on the longitudinal fracture resistance of cortical bone

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a composite material, cortical bone accumulates fatigue microdamage through the repetitive loading of everyday activity (e.g. walking). The accumulation of fatigue microdamage is thought to contribute to the occurrence of fragility fractures in older people. Therefore it is beneficial to understand the relationship between microcrack accumulation and the fracture resistance of cortical bone. Twenty longitudinally orientated compact tension fracture specimens were machined from a single bovine femur, ten specimens were assigned to both the control and fatigue damaged groups. The damaged group underwent a fatigue loading protocol to induce microdamage which was assessed via fluorescent microscopy. Following fatigue loading, non-linear fracture resistance tests were undertaken on both the control and damaged groups using the J-integral method. The interaction of the crack path with the fatigue induced damage and inherent toughening mechanisms were then observed using fluorescent microscopy. The results of this study show that fatigue induced damage reduces the initiation toughness of cortical bone and the growth toughness within the damage zone by three distinct mechanisms of fatigue–fracture interaction. Further analysis of the J-integral fracture resistance showed both the elastic and plastic component were reduced in the damaged group. For the elastic component this was attributed to a decreased number of ligament bridges in the crack wake while for the plastic component this was attributed to the presence of pre-existing fatigue microcracks preventing energy absorption by the formation of new microcracks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burr DB, Forwood MR, Fyhrie DP, et al. Bone microdamage and skeletal fragility in osteoporotic and stress fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 1997;12:6–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Diab T, Condon KW, Burr DB, Vashishth D. Age-related change in the damage morphology of human cortical bone and its role in bone fragility. Bone. 2006;38:427–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schaffler MB, Choi K, Milgrom C. Aging and matrix microdamage accumulation in human compact bone. Bone. 1995;17:521–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zioupos P, Currey J. Changes in the stiffness, strength, and toughness of human cortical bone with age. Bone. 1998;22:57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Waldorff EI, Goldstein SA, McCreadie BR. Age-dependent microdamage removal following mechanically induced microdamage in trabecular bone in vivo. Bone. 2007;40:425–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Danova N, Colopy S, Radtke C, et al. Degradation of bone structural properties by accumulation and coalescence of microcracks. Bone. 2003;33:197–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zioupos P. Accumulation of in vivo fatigue microdamage and its relation to biomechanical properties in ageing human cortical bone. J Microsc. 2001;201:270–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rho J-Y, Kuhn-Spearing L, Zioupos P. Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone. Med Eng Phys. 1998;20:92–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Boyce TM, Fyhrie DP, Glotkowski MC, et al. Damage type and strain mode associations in human compact bone bending fatigue. J Orthop Res. 1998;16:322–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Diab T, Vashishth D. Effects of damage morphology on cortical bone fragility. Bone. 2005;37:96–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Koester KJ, Ager JW, Ritchie RO. The true toughness of human cortical bone measured with realistically short cracks. Nat Mater. 2008;7:672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nalla RK, Kruzic JJ, Kinney JH, Ritchie RO. Effect of aging on the toughness of human cortical bone: evaluation by R-curves. Bone. 2004;35:1240–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ritchie RO, Buehler MJ, Hansma P. Plasticity and toughness in bone. Phys Today. 2009;62:41–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vashishth D, Tanner K, Bonfield W. Experimental validation of a microcracking-based toughening mechanism for cortical bone. J Biomech. 2003;36:121–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zimmermann EA, Schaible E, Bale H, et al. Age-related changes in the plasticity and toughness of human cortical bone at multiple length scales. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:14416–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Norman TL, Yeni YN, Brown CU, Wang Z. Influence of microdamage on fracture toughness of the human femur and tibia. Bone. 1998;23:303–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang X, Puram S. The toughness of cortical bone and its relationship with age. Ann Biomed Eng. 2004;32:123–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Launey ME, Buehler MJ, Ritchie RO. On the mechanistic origins of toughness in bone. Annu Rev Mater Res. 2010;40:25–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vashishth D, Behiri JC, Bonfield W. Crack growth resistance in cortical bone: concept of microcrack toughening. J Biomech. 1997;30:763–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Paschalis EP, Shane E, Lyritis G, et al. Bone fragility and collagen cross-links. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19:2000–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vashishth D. The role of the collagen matrix in skeletal fragility. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2007;5:62–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang X, Shen X, Li X, Mauli Agrawal C. Age-related changes in the collagen network and toughness of bone. Bone. 2002;31:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Martin RB, Gibson VA, Stover SM, et al. Residual strength of equine bone is not reduced by intense fatigue loading: implications for stress fracture. J Biomech. 1997;30:109–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Parsamian GP, Norman TL. Diffuse damage accumulation in the fracture process zone of human cortical bone specimens and its influence on fracture toughness. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2001;12:779–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yeni Y, Fyhrie D. Fatigue damage-fracture mechanics interaction in cortical bone. Bone. 2002;30:509–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Barth HD, Launey ME, MacDowell AA, et al. On the effect of X-ray irradiation on the deformation and fracture behaviour of human cortical bone. Bone. 2010;46:1475–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Koester KJ, Barth HD, Ritchie RO. Effect of aging on the transverse toughness of human cortical bone: evaluation by R-curves. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011;4:1504–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kulin RM, Jiang F, Vecchio KS. Loading rate effects on the R-curve behaviour of cortical bone. Acta Biomater. 2011;7:724–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nalla R, Kruzic J, Kinney J, Ritchie R. Mechanistic aspects of fracture and R-curve behaviour in human cortical bone. Biomaterials. 2005;26:217–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vashishth D. Rising crack-growth-resistance behaviour in cortical bone: implications for toughness measurements. J Biomech. 2004;37:943–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yan J, Mecholsky JJ Jr, Clifton KB. How tough is bone? Application of elastic–plastic fracture mechanics to bone. Bone. 2007;40:479–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yang QD, Cox BN, Nalla RK, Ritchie RO. Fracture length scales in human cortical bone: the necessity of nonlinear fracture models. Biomaterials. 2006;27:2095–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yan J, Taskonak B, Platt JA, Mecholsky JJ Jr. Evaluation of fracture toughness of human dentin using elastic–plastic fracture mechanics. J Biomech. 2008;41:1253–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. ASTM Standard E1820. Test method for measurement of fracture toughness. West Conshohocken: ASTM International; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Fletcher L, Codrington J, Parkinson I. Effects of irradiation and non-enzymatic glycation on the fracture resistance of bovine cortical bone. In: Proc 7th Australas Congr Appl Mech ACAM 7 9-12 Dec 2012 Univ Adel North Terrace Campus Natl Comm Appl Mech Eng Aust 322. 2012

  36. Reilly DT, Burstein AH. The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. J Biomech. 1975;8:393–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Nalla RK, Kruzic JJ, Ritchie RO. On the origin of the toughness of mineralized tissue: microcracking or crack bridging? Bone. 2004;34:790–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. O’Brien FJ, Taylor D, Clive Lee T. The effect of bone microstructure on the initiation and growth of microcracks. J Orthop Res. 2005;23:475–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Fleck C, Eifler D. Deformation behaviour and damage accumulation of cortical bone specimens from the equine tibia under cyclic loading. J Biomech. 2003;36:179–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. O’Brien FJ, Taylor D, Clive Lee T. Bone as a composite material: the role of osteons as barriers to crack growth in compact bone. Int J Fatigue. 2007;29:1051–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lipson SF, Katz JL. The relationship between elastic properties and microstructure of bovine cortical bone. J Biomech. 1984;17:231–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

In kind support for this research was provided by the Bone and Joint Research Laboratory, SA Pathology and the School of Medical Science, The University of Adelaide.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lloyd Fletcher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fletcher, L., Codrington, J. & Parkinson, I. Effects of fatigue induced damage on the longitudinal fracture resistance of cortical bone. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 25, 1661–1670 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-014-5213-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-014-5213-5

Keywords

Navigation