Abstract
Recent studies discuss micro-transmission mechanisms to measure spillover effects of MNC (Multinational Corporations) activity on human capital in host countries. We develop an aggregate transmission mechanism to show that technology deepening in advanced sectors affect economy-wide skill formation, not analyzed in previous studies. Sector-specific advanced technological input and borrowing from local capital market at preferential rates dampens rate of skill formation if local firms are more skill-intensive. Liberal trade policies applied only to MNC sector may lower traditional export if credit subsidy offered to MNCs is simultaneously withdrawn.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
There is also possibility of joint ventures between foreign firms and local private and public firms. See Svejnar and Smith (1984) and Marjit et al. (1995) for comparisons between joint ventures and FDI by MNCs. Local firms acquiring foreign technology often enter into joint venture that brings a significant component of the foreign firm into the host country.
We focus only on general skill acquired by the mass. Our purpose is to see if sector-specific skill upgrade affects the general skill level.
The government schools in developing countries usually operate on this basis. A percentage of eligible children are selected each year by lottery and are inducted in government schools while other applicants must find private facilities or do without it. The students also receive some financial support to stay in school. This may take the form of direct assistance at a fixed rate (stipend, mid-day meals, books, school uniform, subsidised housing facility, etc.). Many countries have hugely subsidised industrial training institutes for training potential industrial workforce.
This assumption regarding preferential treatment has earlier been discussed in Batra (1986) and Batra and Ramachandran (1980) as reputation building strategy on the part of bank and non-bank financial institutions in the host country. Subsidy to industries has also been a well-known practice towards creation of jobs. See Cassidy and Strobl (2004) in this regard.
Detailed calculations are available in the Appendix.
References
Baldwin R, Braconier H, Forslid R (2005) Multinationals, endogenous growth, and technological spillovers: theory and evidence. Rev Int Econ 13(5):945–963
Batra RN (1986) A general equilibrium model of multinational corporations in developing economies. Oxf Econ Pap New Ser 38(2):342–353
Batra RN, Ramachandran R (1980) Multinational firms and the theory of international trade and investment. Am Econ Rev 70(3):278–290
Beladi H, Choi EK (1995) On the emergence of multinational corporations in developing economies: a note. Reg Sci Urban Econ 25:675–684
Berman E, Bound J, Machin S (1998) Implications of skill-biased technological change: international evidence. Q J Econ 113(4):1245–80
Blomström M, Kokko A (2003) Human capital and inward FDI. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 3762, London
Borensztein E, Gregorio J, Lee W (1998) How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth? J Int Econ 45(1):115–35
Carayannis EG, Alexander JM (2006) Global and local knowledge: glocal transatlantic public-private partnerships for research and technological development. Palgrave Macmillan, NY
Carayannis EG, Campbell D (2006) MODE 3: Knowledge creation, diffusion and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters: a comparative systems approach across the United States, Europe and Asia. CT: Praeger
Cassidy M, Strobl E (2004) Subsidizing industry: an empirical analysis of Irish manufacturing, J Ind Compet Trade 4(2):95–107
Chakraborty C, Nunnenkamp P (2008) Economic reforms, FDI, and economic growth in India: a sector level analysis. World Dev 36(7):1192–1212
Chkir IE, Cosset J-C (2001) Diversification strategy and capital structure of multinational corporations. J Multinatl Financ Manag 11:17–37
Cunha F, Heckman J (2007) The technology of skill formation. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2550, Bonn
Cunha F, Heckman J, Lochner L, Masterov D (2006). Interpreting the evidence on life cycle skill formation. In: Hanushek E, Welch F (eds) Handbook of the economics of education. Vol. 1: Ch. 12, 697–812, North Holland
Findlay R, Kierzkowski H (1983) International trade and human capital: a simple general equilibrium model. J Polit Econ 91(6):957–78
Gorg H (2000) Multinational companies and indirect employment: measurement and evidence. Appl Econ 32:1809–1818
Gorg H, Strobl E (2001) Multinational companies and productivity spillovers: a meta-analysis. Econ J 111(475):F723–F739
Greenaway D, Nelson D (2001) Globalization and labour markets: literature review and synthesis, research paper No. 2001/29, Research paper series, globalisation and labour markets programme. University of Nottingham, Nottingham
Haskel J, Pereira S, Slaughter M (2007) Does inward foreign direct investment boost the productivity of domestic firms? Rev Econ Stat 89(3):482–496
Head K, Ries J (2002) Offshore production and skill upgrading by Japanese manufacturing firms. J Int Econ 58(1):81–105
Jones RW (1971) The specific-factor model in trade, theory and history. In: Bhagwati JN et al. (eds) Trade, balance of payments and growth, North Holland, Amsterdam
Kar S, Beladi H (2004) Skill Formation and Trade Reform – Welfare Perspective of Developing Countries, Japan and the World Economy 16(1)35–54
Kim CF, Margetis S, Pantzalis C (2009) Financial sector diversification and MNC valuation. J Multinatl Financ Manag 19:343–354
Kim YJ, Lee J-W (2011) Technological change, human capital structure, and multiple growth paths. Japanese Economic Review. 62, no. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5876.2009.00507.x
Kokko A, Zejan M, Tansini R (2001) Trade regimes and spillover effects of FDI: evidence from Uruguay. Rev World Econ 137(1):124–149
Krugman P (2000) Technology, trade and factor prices. J Int Econ 50:51–71
Leamer E (1998) In search of stolper-samuelson linkages between international trade and lower wages. In: Collins S (ed) Imports, exports and the American worker. Brookings institution. 141–202
Marjit S, Broll U, Mallick I (1995) A theory of overseas joint ventures. Econ Lett 47:367–370
Markusen JR, Trofimenko N (2009) Teaching locals New tricks: foreign experts as a channel of knowledge transfers. J Dev Econ 88(1):120–31
Ritchie BK (2002) Foreign direct investment and intellectual capital formation in southeast asia, OECD development centre, OECD development centre working papers. 194, Geneva
Slaughter M (2002) Skill upgrading, in developing countries: has inward foreign direct Investment played a role? OECD development centre, OECD development centre working papers: 192, Geneva
Svejnar J, Smith S (1984) The economics of joint ventures in less developed countries. Q J Economics 99(1):149–168
Xu B (2000) Multinational enterprises, technology diffusion, and host country productivity growth. J Dev Econ 62(2):477–93
Zhao J, Wang K (2009) Analysis of the technology spillovers of multinational corporations. Transnatl Corp Rev 1(2):28–37
Acknowledgements
We are very grateful to an anonymous reviewer for comments and suggestions that improved the paper significantly. The usual disclaimer applies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1
From Section 2: The construction of matrix follows. From (13) and (14),
From Section 3: Taking percentage changes, from (5), \( {\theta_{SY }}{{\widehat{w}}_S}+{\theta_{KY }}\widehat{r}=\widehat{P}_Y^{*} \)
Using (6),
Finally, from (4), \( {\theta_{TX }}\widehat{\tau}+{\theta_{SX }}{{\widehat{w}}_S}+{\theta_{KX }}{{\widehat{r}}_X}=0 \). Therefore using (A2), \( {\theta_{SY }}{{\widehat{w}}_S}+\frac{{{\theta_{KY }}}}{{{\theta_{KS }}}}{{\widehat{w}}_S}=\widehat{P}_Y^{*} \). Again from the labor and capital endowment equations and substituting factor price changes:
and
So, from (10): \( {\lambda_{LS }}\widehat{S}={\lambda_{LS }}{\theta_{KS }}{\sigma_S}\frac{{\widehat{P}_Y^{*}}}{{{{{\widetilde{\theta}}}_{KY }}}}+{{\widehat{L}}_E} \). Using these,
This solves for \( \left[ {\widehat{Y},\widehat{S}} \right] \):
According to the conditions in (25), \( \widehat{Y}\frac{>}{<}0\;\;while\;\;\widehat{S} > 0 \) from (26). QED.
Appendix 2
From (23),
where, \( {\beta_Y}=\left[ {{\lambda_{KS }}{\lambda_{SY }}{\theta_{KY }}+{\lambda_{KY }}{\theta_{SY }}} \right]>0,\;{\beta_X}=\left[ {{\lambda_{KS }}{\lambda_{SX }}{\theta_{KX }}+{\lambda_{KX }}{\theta_{SX }}} \right]>0 \)
and \( \beta_S^S={\lambda_{KS }}{\theta_{LS }} > 0 \).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kar, S., Sinha, C. Sectoral Technical Progress and Aggregate Skill Formation. J Ind Compet Trade 14, 159–172 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-013-0152-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-013-0152-2