Skip to main content
Log in

When the subject follows the object. On a curiosity in the syntax of personal pronouns in some German dialects

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, I present new data from several German dialects concerning the order of pronominal subjects and objects. The data are taken from three sources (Wenker survey, Bavarian Linguistic Atlas, Syntax of Hessian Dialects) and cover a time span of nearly 150 years, thus providing a very robust empirical basis. Although the canonical order in all German varieties is subject before object and this serialization holds for pronominal as well as for non-pronominal arguments, a certain proportiom of reverse orders for pronouns is attested in all three data sources. That is, there are speakers of various dialectal varieties who prefer object before subject as the unmarked order of pronouns (e.g., haben dir sie geholfen lit. ‘have you they helped’). I will try to explain the emergence of the reverse order adopting the null subject cycle (NSC) proposed by Fuß and Wratil (2013) as a point of departure and modifying it into a more general pronoun cycle (PC): The PC implies the development of reduced pronouns out of full ones, which then replace clitic or null pronouns (depending on the person and number combination). The reverse order comprises the steps in the cycle where a clitic or a null subject pronoun is replaced with a reduced subject pronoun out of which eventually a clitic pronoun evolves. The reduced subject pronoun follows the object clitic as the clitic subject does as well for a short period of time before it is placed again before the object clitic. In the concluding section I discuss the observable mismatch between morphological paradigms and the syntactic level, in that syntax requires a tripartite distinction for which morphology mostly provides only two distinct forms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham, Werner, and Anko Wiegel. 1993. Reduktionsformen und Kasussynkretismus bei deutschen und niederländischen Pronomina. In Dialektsyntax, ed. Werner Abraham and Joseph Bayer. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. LB Sonderheft 5.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Axel, Katrin, and Helmut Weiß. 2011. Pro-drop in the history of German: from Old High German to the modern dialects. In Empty pronouns, ed. Peter Gallmann and Melanie Wratil, 21–51. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, Josef. 1984. COMP in Bavarian syntax. The Linguistic Review 3: 209–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breitbarth, Anne. 2005. Live fast, die young—the short life of Early Modern German auxiliary ellipsis. Ph.D. Diss., Tilburg University. Utrecht: LOT dissertation 115. (Dissertation).

  • Cardinaletti, Anna. 1999. Pronouns in Germanic and Romance languages: An overview. In Clitics in the languages of Europe, ed. Henk van Riemsdijk, 34–82. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Empirical Approaches to Language Typology / Eurotyp 20–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardinaletti, Anna, and Michel Starke. 1999. The typology of structural deficiency: On the three grammaticalclasses. In Clitics in the languages of Europe, ed. Henk van Riemsdijk, 145–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Empirical Approaches to Language Typology / Eurotyp 20–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, J.K., and Peter Trudgill. 2004. Dialectology, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Kathrin. 1999. On the nature and distribution of Zurich German pronominal clitics. In Clitics in the languages of Europe, ed. Henk van Riemsdijk, 711–772. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Empirical Approaches to Language Typology / Eurotyp 20–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corver, Norbert, and Denis Delfitto. 1999. On the nature of pronoun movement. In Clitics in the languages of Europe, ed. Henk van Riemsdijk, 799–861. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Eurotyp 20–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen, and Marjo van Koppen. 2008. Pronominal doubling in Dutch dialects: Big DPs and coordinations. In Microvariation in syntactic doubling, ed. Sjef Barbiers, Olav Koeneman, and Maria Lekakou, 207–239. Bingley: Emerald. Syntax and Semantics 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Déchaine, Rose-Marie, and Martina Wiltschko. 2002. Decomposing pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 409–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischer, Jürg. forthc. Pro-Drop und Pronominalenklise in den Dialekten des Deutschen: eine Auswertung von Wenkersatz 12. In Deutsche Dialekte: Konzepte, Probleme, Handlungsfelder. Akten des 4. Kongresses der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Dialektologie des Deutschen (IGDD), ed. Michael Elementaler and Markus Hundt. Stuttgart: Steiner (Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik Beihefte).

  • Fleischer, Jürg, Simon Kasper, and Alexandra N. Lenz. 2012. Die Erhebung syntaktischer Phänomene durch die indirekte Methode: Ergebnisse und Erfahrungen aus dem Forschungsprojekt „Syntax hessischer Dialekte“(SyHD). Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 79(1): 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidin, Robert, and Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 2001. Exquisite connections: Some remarks on the evolution of linguistic theory. Lingua 111: 639–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuß, Eric. 2005. The rise of agreement. A formal approach to the syntax and grammaticalization of verbal inflection. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fuß, Eric. 2008. Multiple agreement and the representation of inflection in the C-domain. Linguistische Berichte 213: 78–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuß, Eric, and Melani Wratil. 2013. Der Nullsubjektzyklus: Etablierung und Verlust von Nullargumenten. In Comparing Diachronies, ed. Jürg Fleischer and Horst Simon, 163–196. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärtner, Hans-Martin, and Markus Steinbach. 2003a. What do reduced pronominals reveal about the syntax of Dutch and German? Part 1: Clause-internal positions. Linguistische Berichte 195: 257–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärtner, Hans-Martin, and Markus Steinbach. 2003b. What do reduced pronominals reveal about the syntax of Dutch and German? Part 2: Fronting. Linguistische Berichte 196: 459–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, Anton. 1989. Die Westallgäuer Mundart. 1. Grammatik. Sprache - Literatur und Geschichte 2. Winter: Heidelberg.

  • Haag-Merz, Christine. 1996. Pronomen im Schwäbischen - Syntax und Erwerb. Univ. Stuttgart. Edition Wissenschaft, Reihe Sprachwissenschaften Bd. 6. (Dissertation)

  • Haftka, Brigitta. 1981. Reihenfolgebeziehungen im Satz. In Grundzüge einer deutschen Grammatik, ed. Karl-Erich Heidolph et al., 702–764. Berlin: Akademieverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haider, Hubert. 1993. Deutsche syntax—Generativ. Tübingen: Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haider, Hubert, and Inger Rosengren. 1998. Scrambling.[Sprache und Pragmatik 49] Lund: Germanistisches Institut.

  • Harnisch, Rüdiger. 1989. Die sogenannte ‚sogenannte Flexion der Konjunktionen‘. Ein Paradigma aus der Bavaria thuringica. In Bayerisch-österreichische Dialektforschung, ed. Erwin Koller et al., 283–290. Würzburg: Königshausen u. Neumann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoberg, Ursula. 1997. Die Linearstruktur des Satzes. In Grammatik der deutschen Sprache, ed. Gisela Zifonun, Ludger Homann, and Bruno Strecker, 1498–1680. [Schriften des Instituts für Deutsche Sprache] Berlin/ New York: de Gruyter.

  • Hofmann, Ute. 1994. Zur Topologie im Mittelfeld: Pronominale und nominale Satzglieder. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Höhle, Tilman. 1982. Über Komposition und Derivation: zur Konstituentenstruktur von Wortbildungsprodukten im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 1: 76–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenerz, Jürgen. 1977. Zur Abfolge nominaler Satzglieder im Deutschen. Tübingen: Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenerz, Jürgen. 1992. Zur Syntax der Pronomina im Deutschen, Sprache und Pragmatik 29. Lund: University of Lund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Gereon. 2002. Harmonic alignment and the hierarchy of pronouns in German 2001. In Pronouns—Grammar and representation, ed. Horst Simon and Heike Wiese, 205–232. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nübling, Damaris. 1992. Klitika im Deutschen. Schriftsprache, Umgangssprache, alemannische Dialekte. Tübingen: Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Ian. 2010. Agreement and head movement: Clitics, incorporation, and defective goals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seiler, Guido. 2012. Non-standard average European. Talk at the IGDD-Kongress, Universität Kiel, 15.9.2012.

  • Staedele, Alfons. 1927. Syntax der Mundart von Stahringen. Moritz Schauenburg: Lahr i.Br.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternefeld, Wolfgang. 2007. Syntax. Eine morphologisch motivierte generative Beschreibung des Deutschen, vol. 1. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strobel, Thomas. 2012. On the areal and syntactic distribution of indefinite-partitive pronouns in German: methodological advances and empirical results within the project “Syntax of Hessian Dialects” (SyHD). In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Limits and Areas in Dialectology (LimiAr). Lisbon 2011, ed. Xosé Afonso Álvarez Pérez, Ernestina Carrilho, and Catarina Magro. http://limiar.clul.ul.pt, Lisboa: Centro de Linguística da Universidade de Lisboa.

  • Van Gelderen, Elly. 2011a. The linguistic cycle: Language change and the language faculty. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Gelderen, Elly. 2011b. Language change as cyclical. Studies in Modern English 27: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volodina, Anna, and Weiß, Helmut. forthc. Diachronic development of null subjects in German. In Firm foundations: Quantitative approaches to grammar and grammatical change, ed. Yannick Versley and Sam Featherston. Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter. (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs).

  • Weiß, Helmut. 1998. Syntax des Bairischen. Studien zur Grammatik einer natürlichen Sprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Linguistische Arbeiten 391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiß, Helmut. 2004. Information structure meets Minimalist syntax. On argument order and case morphology in Bavarian. In The Composition of meaning: From lexeme to discourse, ed. Alice ter Meulen and Werner Abraham, 139–165. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 255.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weiß, Helmut. 2005. Inflected complementizers in Continental West Germanic Dialects. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 72(2): 148–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiß, Helmut. 2013. UG und syntaktische (Mikro-)Variation. In Dialektologie in neuem Gewand. Zu Mikro-/Varietätenlinguistik, Sprachenvergleich und Universalgrammatik, ed. Werner Abraham and Elisabeth Leiss, 171–204. Sonderheft Linguistische Berichte.

  • Weiß, Helmut. forthc. a. Pronominalsyntax deutscher Dialekte. In Syntaktische Variation – areallinguistische Perspektiven, ed. Alexandra L. Lenz and Franz Patocka. Wien: Wiener Linguistische Arbeiten.

  • Weiß, Helmut. forthc. b. The Wackernagel position and complementizer agreement – The emergence of a syntactic particularity at the left edge of the German middle field. In Clause structure and word order in the history of German, eds. Gisella Ferraresi, Agnes Jäger, and Helmut Weiß.

  • Werner, Ingegerd. 1999. Die Personalpronomen im Zürichdeutschen. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International. Lunder germanistische Forschungen 63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiltschko, Martina. 1998. On the syntax and semantics of (relative) pronouns and determiners. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2: 143–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida, Mitsunobu. 1999. Zur Bewegung der Personalpronomina im Deutschen. Studies in Language and Culture 25: 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

Sources

  • [BSA – SBS] König, Werner (ed.) 2003. Bayerischer Sprachatlas. Sprachatlas von Bayerisch-Schwaben. Band 9,2: Formengeographie II. Heidelberg.

  • [BSA – SMF] Heyse, Thurid et al. 2007. Bayerischer Sprachatlas. Sprachatlas von Mittelfranken Vol. 7: Morphologie und Syntax. Heidelberg.

  • [DiWA] Schmidt, Jürgen Erich, and Joachim Herrgen (eds.) 2001–2009. Digitaler Wenkeratlas. Marburg: Forschungszentrum Deutscher Sprachatlas. http://www.diwa.info.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helmut Weiß.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weiß, H. When the subject follows the object. On a curiosity in the syntax of personal pronouns in some German dialects. J Comp German Linguistics 18, 65–92 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-015-9071-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-015-9071-4

Keywords

Navigation