Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Specificities of the artistic cultural labor market in Brazilian metropolitan regions between 2002 and 2010

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Cultural Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes the singularity of artistic cultural sector workers in the Brazilian metropolitan labor market, considering the job satisfaction of artists that Throsby proposes in his work preference model of artist behavior (1994). We also examine the effect of public expenditures on the income of workers in the cultural sector. Using 2002 to 2010 data from the Monthly Employment Survey (PME) and administrative records from Finance of Brazil (FINBRA), we estimate a probit model and a wage equation. In our model, we estimate wages as a function of: (1) sociodemographic characteristics of workers, (2) a variable for informal jobs, (3) the number of working hours, (4) a variable for the worker having another job, (5) per capita expenditures on culture interacted with a dummy for artistic cultural workers, (6) interactive binary variables involving place of residence and artistic cultural workers and (7) the predicted probability obtained by the probit model. This probability is estimated based on the likelihood of working in a creative activity, considering both workers from the cultural sector and other workers, controlled by: (1) sociodemographic characteristics of workers, (2) characteristics of their jobs, (3) dummies for the metropolitan regions and (4) willingness of creative workers to work additional hours interacted with the number of hours worked. Our results show that workers in the cultural sector are likely to work longer hours when compared to workers in other sectors. For our wage equation, the results suggest that women earn relatively less than men and blacks earn less than whites. Furthermore, earnings increase with age and the level of education. Formal workers obtain higher earnings when compared to informal ones. Finally, an increase in the per capita public expenditure on the cultural sector raises the income of workers in artistic cultural occupations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Artistic cultural sector includes, in this paper, all occupations associated to arts and culture, considering only core activities.

  2. Individuals working in the artistic sector when the survey was carried out or in the previous 3 to 5 years.

  3. This definition is closer to the one used in this paper, although the concept of artistic cultural workers (explained later in the text) includes occupations which are not strictly artistic, such as journalists, architects and designers etc. See the definition in Sect. 3.1.

  4. Psychic income.

  5. See IBGE (2002).

  6. The use of this interactive variable is explained in the next subsection.

  7. Institute for Applied Economic Research, Brazil.

References

  • Abbing, H. (2002). Why are artists poor? The exceptional economy of the arts. Amsterdam: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alper, N. O., & Wassall, G. H. (2006). Artists’ careers and their labor markets. In V. A. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of arts and culture (pp. 814–861). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa, F. (2004). Financiamento cultural: Situação Atual e Questões Para Reflexão (Cultural finance: actual situation and questions to think). Políticas Sociais Ipea. Available at http://www.ipea.gov.br, Vol 8, pp. 141–147.

  • Baumol, W., & Bowen, W. (1966). Performing arts: The economic dilemma. Massachussets: Yale University Press. 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhamou, F. (2003). Artists’ labor markets. In R. Towse (Ed.), A handbook of cultural economics (pp. 69–75). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. E. (2000). Creative industries: Contracts between art and commerce. Cambridge 20(2), 93–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S. (2008). Happiness: A revolution in economics. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., & Pommerehne, W. W. (1989). Muses and markets: Explorations in the economics of the arts. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golgher, A. (2011). A distribuição de indivíduos qualificados nas regiões metropolitanas brasileiras: a influência do entretenimento e da diversidade populacional (The distribution of skilled individuals in the metropolitan regions in Brazil: the influence of bohemia and population diversity). Nova Economia, 1(21), 109–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBGE (Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics). (2002). PME (Monthly Employment Survey). Microdata, from 2002 to 2010.

  • Layard, R. (2006). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A., & Schrock, G. (2006). The artistic dividend: Urban artistic specialisation and economic development implications. Urban Studies, 43(10), 1661–1686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menger, P. M. (1999). Artistic labor markets and careers. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 541–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menger, P.-M. (2006). Artistic labor markets: Contingent work, excess supply and occupational risk management. In Ginsburgh, V. A. & Throsby, D., (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of arts and culture. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V, pp. 766–806, North-Holland Elsevier, Oxford, Britain.

  • Moreira, A. G. (2011). O setor cultural brasileiro: análise da evolução do mercado de trabalho. (Brazilian cultural sector: Analysis of labour market evolution). Monograph—FACE/UFMG, Belo Horizonte.

  • Murray, C. (2003). Human accomplishment: The pursuit of excellence in the arts and sciences, 800 B.C.to 1950. New York: Harper Collins.

  • Rabelo, A. (2009). Determinantes do rendimento dos ocupados no setor cultural no Brasil: uma análise para, Factors associated with the earnings of workers in the cultural sector: an analysis in 2006. Monograph: FACE/UFMG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rengers, M. (2002). Economic lives of artists: Studies into careers and the labour market in the cultural sector. Doctoral Thesis. Utrecht University.

  • Steiner, L., & Schneider, L. (2013). The happy artist? An empirical application of the work-preference model. Journal of Cultural Economics, 37(2), 225–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Throsby, D. (1994). A work-preference model of artist behaviour. In A. Peacock & I. Rizzo (Eds.), Cultural economics and cultural policies. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Throsby, D. (2001a). Economics and culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Throsby, D. (2001b). Defining the artistic workforce: The Australian experience. Poetics, 28, 255–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Towse, R. (1992). The earnings of singers: An economic analysis. In R. Towse & A. Kahkee (Eds.), Cultural economics. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Towse, R. (2006). Human capital and artists’ labour markets. In V. A. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of arts and culture (pp. 866–892). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Withers, G. (1985). Artists’ subsidy of the arts. Australian Economic Papers, 24, 290–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Flávia Machado.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Machado, A.F., Rabelo, A. & Moreira, A.G. Specificities of the artistic cultural labor market in Brazilian metropolitan regions between 2002 and 2010. J Cult Econ 38, 237–251 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-013-9210-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-013-9210-1

Keywords

Navigation