Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

ABox Abduction in the Description Logic \(\boldsymbol{\mathcal{ALC}}\)

  • Published:
Journal of Automated Reasoning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to the growing popularity of Description Logics-based knowledge representation systems, predominantly in the context of Semantic Web applications, there is a rising demand for tools offering non-standard reasoning services. One particularly interesting form of reasoning, both from the user as well as the ontology engineering perspective, is abduction. In this paper we introduce two novel reasoning calculi for solving ABox abduction problems in the Description Logic \(\mathcal{ALC}\), i.e. problems of finding minimal sets of ABox axioms, which when added to the knowledge base enforce entailment of a requested set of assertions. The algorithms are based on regular connection tableaux and resolution with set-of-support and are proven to be sound and complete. We elaborate on a number of technical issues involved and discuss some practical aspects of reasoning with the methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aliseda-Llera, A.: Seeking Explanations: Abduction in Logic, Philosophy of Science and Artificial Intelligence. PhD thesis, ILLC Disertation Series, University of Amsterdam (1997)

  2. Andrews, P.B.: Theorem proving via general matings. J. ACM 28(2), 193–214 (1981)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press (2003)

  4. Baader, F., Nutt, W.: Basic description logics. In: Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.) The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications, pp. 47–100. Cambridge University Press (2003)

  5. Bachmair, L., Ganzinger, H.: Resolution theorem proving. In: Robinson, A., Voronkov, A. (eds.) Handbook of Automated Reasoning, pp. 1–82. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (2001)

  6. Bada, M., Mungall, C., Hunter, L.: A call for an abductive reasoning feature in OWL-reasoning tools toward ontology quality control. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop OWL: Experiences and Directions 2008 (OWLED’08 Karlsruhe) (2008)

  7. Bibel, W.: On matrices with connections. J. ACM 28(4), 633–645 (1981)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Bienvenu, M.: Complexity of abduction in the EL family of lightweight description logics. In: Proceedings of KR2008, 11th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (2008)

  9. Blackburn, P., van Benthem, J.: Modal logic: a semantic perspective. In: Blackburn, P., van Benthem, J., Wolter, F. (eds.) Handbook of Modal Logic, pp. 1–82. Elsevier (2006)

  10. Colucci, S., Noia, T.D., Sciascio, E.D., Donini, F.M., Mongiello, M.: A uniform tableaux-based approach to concept abduction and contraction in ALN. In: Proceedings of the 2004 International Workshop on Description Logics (DL2004) (2004)

  11. Cox, P.T., Pietrzykowski, T.: Causes for events: their computation and applications. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automated Deduction, pp. 608–621 (1986)

  12. Elsenbroich, C.: Instinct for Detection. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, King’s College London (2005)

  13. Elsenbroich, C., Kutz, O., Sattler, U.: A case for abductive reasoning over ontologies. In: Grau, B.C., Hitzler, P., Shankey, C., Wallace, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the OWLED’06 workshop on OWL: Experiences and Directions 2006, vol. 216 (2006)

  14. Endriss, U., Mancarella, P., Sadri, F., Terreni, G., Toni, F.: The CIFF proof procedure for abductive logic programming with constraints. In: Alferes, J.J., Leite, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA-2004). LNAI, vol. 3229, pp. 31–43. Springer-Verlag (2004)

  15. Espinosa Peraldi, S., Kaya, A., Melzer, S., Möller, R., Wessel, M.: Multimedia interpretation as abduction. In: International Workshop on Description Logics (DL-2007) (2007)

  16. Flach, P., Kakas, A. (eds.): Abduction and Induction: Essays on their relation and integration. Kluwer Academic Publishers (2000)

  17. Gabbay, D.M.: Elementary Logics: A Procedural Perspective. Prentice Hall Europe, UK (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gabbay, D.M., Olivetti, N.: Goal-directed proof theory. Applied Logic Series, vol. 21. Kluwer Academic Publishers (2000)

  19. Gabbay, D.M., Woods, J.: Advice on abductive logic. Log. J. IGPL 14(2), 182–219 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Haarslev, V., Möller, R.: RACER system description. In: Goré, R., Leitsch, A., Nipkow, T. (eds.) International Joint Conference on Automated Reasoning, IJCAR’2001, pp. 701–705 (2001)

  21. Hähnle, R.: Tableaux and related methods. In: Robinson, A., Voronkov, A. (eds.) Handbook of Automated Reasoning, pp. 101–178. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (2001)

  22. Hähnle, R., Murray, N., Rosenthal, E.: Linearity and regularity with negation normal form. Theor. Comp. Sci. 328(4), 325–354 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Horridge, M., Parsia, B., Sattler, U.: Laconic and precise justifications in OWL. In: The International Semantic Web Conference 2008 (ISWC 08) (2008)

  24. Horrocks, I.: The FaCT system. In: de Swart, H. (ed.) Proceedings of the 2nd Int. Conf. on Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods (TABLEAUX’98). Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1397, pp. 307–312. Springer (1998)

  25. Horrocks, I., Kutz, O., Sattler, U.: The even more irresistible SROIQ. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 57–67 (2006)

  26. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., van Harmelen, F.: From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: The making of a web ontology language. Journal of Web Semantics 1(1), 7–26 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kakas, A.C., Kowalski, R.A., Toni, F.: Abductive logic programming. J. Log. Comput. 2(6), 719–770 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Kalyanpur, A., Parsia, B., Grau, B.C.: Beyond asserted axioms: Fine-grain justifications for OWL-DL entailments. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Description Logics DL’06, (2006)

  29. Kazakov, Y., Motik, B.: A resolution-based decision procedure for SHOIQ. J. Autom. Reason. 40(2–3), 89–116 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Klarman, S.: ABox Abduction in Description Logic. Master’s thesis, ILLC, University of Amsterdam. http://www.illc.uva.nl/Publications/ResearchReports/MoL-2008-03.text.pdf (2008)

  31. Loveland, D.W.: Automated theorem proving: a logical basis. Fundamental Studies in Computer Science, vol. 6. North-Holland Publishing (1978)

  32. Mayer, M.C., Pirri, F.: First order abduction via tableau and sequent calculi. Bull. IGPL 1(1), 99–117 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Mayer, M.C., Pirri, F. Propositional abduction in modal logic. Journal of the Interest Group in Pure and Applied Logics 3(6), 907–919 (1995)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Möller, R., Neumann, B.: Ontology-based reasoning techniques for multimedia interpretation and retrieval. In: Kompatsiaris, Y., Hobson, P. (eds.) Semantic Multimedia and Ontologies: Theory and Applications. Springer (2008)

  35. Motik, B., Shearer, R., Horrocks, I.: Optimized reasoning in description logics using hypertableaux. In: Pfenning, F. (ed.) Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Automated Deduction (CADE-21), vol. 4603, pp. 67–83 (2007)

  36. Paul G.: Approaches to abductive reasoning: an overview. Artif. Intell. Rev. 7(2), 109–152 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Quine, W.V.O.: On cores and prime implicants of truth functions. Am. Math. Mon. 66(9), 755–760 (1959)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Schild, K.: A correspondence theory for terminological logics: preliminary report. In: Proceedings of IJCAI-91, 12th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 466–471. Sidney, AU (1991)

  39. Schlobach, S., Huang, Z., Cornet, R., van Harmelen, F.: Debugging incoherent terminologies. J. Autom. Reason. 33(3), 317–349 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Schurz, G.: Models of Abductive Reasoning. TPD Preprint 1, University of Düsseldorf (2002)

  41. Tammet, T.: Resolution Methods for Decision Problems and Finite-Model Building. PhD thesis, Göteborg University (1992)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Szymon Klarman & Stefan Schlobach

  2. Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Ulle Endriss

Authors
  1. Szymon Klarman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ulle Endriss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stefan Schlobach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Szymon Klarman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klarman, S., Endriss, U. & Schlobach, S. ABox Abduction in the Description Logic \(\boldsymbol{\mathcal{ALC}}\) . J Autom Reasoning 46, 43–80 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10817-010-9168-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10817-010-9168-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation