Abstract
The aim of this article is to further our understanding of the “GM is unnatural” view, and of the critical response to it. While many people have been reported to hold the view that GM is unnatural, many policy-makers and their advisors have suggested that the view must be ignored or rejected, and that there are scientific reasons for doing so. Three “typical” examples of ways in which the “GM is unnatural” view has been treated by UK policy-makers and their advisors are explored. These are the Government’s position (DEFRA Report), the account of the Nuffield Council on Bioethics, and the position of Nigel Halford, a scientist with an advisory role to the Government. I show that their accounts fail to mount a convincing critique. Then, I draw on an empirical research project held during 2003–2004 at the University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne in the north east of England. Scientists met with non-scientists in a range of facilitated one-to-one conversations (“exchanges”) on various environmental issues, one of which was on GM. Our findings show that some scientists who rejected the “GM is unnatural” view struggled to do so consistently. Their struggle is interpreted in terms of a conflict between a so-called “scientific” worldview, and a different worldview that underlies the concerns of those who held the “GM is unnatural” view. This worldview is explored further by an examination of their concerns. What distinguishes this worldview from the “scientific” worldview is that the instrumentalization of the nonhuman world is questioned to a larger extent. I conclude that, because the underlying concerns of those who held the “GM is unnatural” view were not with GM as such, yet with a worldview that was considered to be problematic, and of which many GM applications were held to be expressions, policy-makers and their advisors should reflect on the critical worldview of those who claim that GM is unnatural if they want to engage seriously with their concerns.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Annerberg, R., “The Present Status of the Use of Genetically Modified Crops in the EU – The Current Situation and a Vision for the Future,” Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B, Soil and Plant Science (Supplementum 1) (2003), 14–18
J. Beckwith T. Hadlock H. Suffron (2003) ArticleTitlePublic Perceptions of Plant Biotechnology – A Focus Group Study New Genetics and Society 22 93–109 Occurrence Handle10.1080/14636770307130
Bruce, D., “GM Ethical Decision Making in Practice,” Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics (2002), 75–78
G. Cook (2004) Genetically Modified Language Routledge London, New York
G. Cook E. Pieri P. Robbins (2004) ArticleTitleThe Scientists Think and the Public Feels: Expert Perceptions of the Discourse of GM Food Discourse and Society 15 433–449 Occurrence Handle10.1177/0957926504043708
D. Cooley G. Goreham (2004) ArticleTitleAre Transgenic Organisms Unnatural? Ethics and the Environment 9 46–55
Dale, P., “Genetically Modified Crops and Risk Assessment in the UK,” Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B, Soil and Plant Science (Supplementum 1) (2003), 19–21
C. Deane-Drummond R. Grove-White B. Szerszynski (2003) Genetically Modified Theology The Religious Dimensions of Public Concerns about Agricultural Biotechnology C. Deane-Drummond B. Szerszynski (Eds) Re-ordering Nature Theology, Society and the New Genetics T&T Clark London pp. 17–38
J. Deckers (2004) ArticleTitleChristianity, and Ecological Ethics. The Significance of Process Thought and a Panexperientialist Critique of Strong Anthropocentrism Ecotheology 9 359–387 Occurrence Handle10.1558/ecot.9.3.359.59073
InstitutionalAuthorNameDEFRA (2004) The GM Dialogue: Government Response DEFRA London
Gee, H., “Futurology: What Next?” Guardian (June 26, 2001), 14
GM Public Debate Steering Board, GM Nation? The Findings of the Public Debate (Department of Trade and Industry, London, 2003). (http://www.gmnation.org.uk)
R. Grove-White P. Macnaghten S. Mayer B. Wynne (1997) Uncertain World Genetically Modified Organisms, Food and Public Attitudes in Britain Centre for the Study of Environmental Change, Lancaster University Lancaster
N. G. Halford (2003) Genetically Modified Crops Imperial College Press London
C. Hendry (2002) ArticleTitleScience, Industry and the Laity. Towards a Knowledgeable Society for Biotechnology New Genetics and Society 21 177–198 Occurrence Handle10.1080/1463677022000007005
L. Levidow (2001) ArticleTitleUtilitarian Bioethics? Market Fetishism in the GM Crops Debate New Genetics and Society 20 75–84 Occurrence Handle10.1080/14636770123667
P. Macnaghten (2004) ArticleTitleAnimals in Their Nature. A Case Study on Public Attitudes to Animals, Genetic Modification and Nature Sociology 38 533–551 Occurrence Handle10.1177/0038038504043217
Madsen, K., P. Sandøe, and J. Lassen, “Genetically Modified Crops: A US Farmer’s Versus an EU Citizen’s Point of View,” Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B, Soil and Plant Science Supplementum 1 (2002), 60–67
Marris, C., B. Wynne, P. Simmons, and S. Weldon, Public Perceptions of Agricultural Biotechnologies in Europe, 2001 (http://www.lancs.ac.uk/depts/ieppp/pabe/docs/pabe_finalreport)
B. McKibben (1999) The End of Nature EditionNumber2 Anchor Books New York
InstitutionalAuthorNameNuffield Council on Bioethics (1999) Genetically Modified Foods. The Ethical and Social Issues Nuffield Council on Bioethics London
InstitutionalAuthorNameNuffield Council on Bioethics (2003) The Use of Genetically Modified Crops in Developing Countries Nuffield Council on Bioethics London
InstitutionalAuthorNamePolicy Ethics and Life Sciences Research Institute (2003) The People’s Report on GM Crops Newcastle PEALS
C. Raffensperger (2003) Learning to Speak Ethics in Technological Debates B. Bailey M. Lappe (Eds) Engineering the Farm: Ethical and Social Aspects of Agricultural Biotechnology Island Press Washington pp. 125–133
T. Rogers Hayden J. Campbell (2003) ArticleTitleRe-negotiating Science in Environmentalists’ Submissions to New Zealand’s Royal Commission on Genetic Modification Environmental Values 12 515–534
R. Sandler (2004) ArticleTitleAn Aretaic Objection to Agricultural Biotechnology Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 301–314 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:JAGE.0000033078.05859.08
M. Scott S. Carr (2003) ArticleTitleCultural Theory and Plural Rationalities: Perspectives on GM among UK Scientists Innovation 16 349–368
Shaw, A., “What Are ȁ8They’ Doing to Our Food? Public Concerns about Food in the UK,” Sociological Research Online 4(3) (1999). (http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/4/3/shaw.html)
A. Shaw (2002) ArticleTitleIt Just Goes Against the Grain Public Understandings of Genetically Modified (GM) Food in the UK Public Understanding of Science 11 273–291 Occurrence Handle10.1088/0963-6625/11/3/305 Occurrence Handle12430532
W. Simon (2003) The Agricultural Advantages and Consumer Acceptance or Otherwise of Genetically Modified Crops with Particular Emphasis on Potatoes Nuffield Farming Scholarships Trust Blaston
H. Verhoog M. Katze E. Lammerts Van Bueren T. Baars (2003) ArticleTitleThe Role of the Concept of the Natural (Naturalness) in Organic Farming Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 29–49 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1021714632012
B. Wynne (1996) May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide S. Lash B. Szerszynski B. Wynne (Eds) Risk, Environment, and Modernity. Towards a New Ecology Sage London pp. 44–83
B. Wynne (2001) ArticleTitleCreating Public Alienation: Expert Cultures of Risk and Ethics of GMOs Science as Culture 10 445–481 Occurrence Handle10.1080/09505430120093586 Occurrence Handle15971363
B. Wynne (2003) Interpreting Public Concerns about GMOs – Questions of Meaning C. Deane-Drummond B. Szerszynski (Eds) Reordering Nature. Theology, Society, and the New Genetics T&T Clark London 221–248
M. Zwick (2000) ArticleTitleGenetic Engineering: Risks and Hazards as Perceived by the German Public New Genetics and Society 19 269–281
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Deckers, J. Are Scientists Right and Non-Scientists Wrong? Reflections on Discussions of GM. J Agric Environ Ethics 18, 451–478 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-0902-1
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-0902-1