Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Monopolising the STEM agenda in second-level schools: exploring power relations and subject subcultures

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ubiquitous and often pervasive expansion of the science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) agenda across global education systems has largely gone uncontested. Strategic efforts to build on perceived natural subject synergies across the separate STEM disciplines are promoted as central to supporting the growth of economies through the development of human capital and by ensuring the supply of suitably trained individuals for vocational roles in these areas. However, these efforts are predicated on the assumption that such perceived natural subject synergies can easily support pedagogical complimentary and in so doing, often fail to acknowledge the social histories of the subjects involved. In this paper the authors examine the divergence in treatment of STEM subjects within the Irish second-level context through the lenses of subject hierarchies and social class. The cultural capital associated with studying each of the respective STEM subjects in school is considered and the objectives of the STEM agenda are problematised.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banks, J., Byrne, D., McCoy, S., & Smith, E. (2009). Engaging young people? Student experiences of the leaving certificate applied programme. ESRI Research Series No. 15. Technical Report. Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin, Ireland.

  • Berker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students’ learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 12(5), 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1975). Class, codes and control: Towards a theory of educational transmission (Vol. III). London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1990). The structuring of pedagogic discourse: Class codes and control (Vol. IV). London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London-Beverley Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breiner, J., Harkness, S., Johnson, C., & Koehler, C. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., Brown, J., Reardon, K., & Merrill, C. (2011). Understanding STEM: Current perceptions. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(6), 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, W. (1998). The curriculum in and for a democratic society. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 6(3), 323–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A., & Ernst, J. (2006). A model for the integration of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. The Technology Teacher, 66(4), 24–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, M. (2012). The response of the Roman Catholic Church to the introduction of vocational education in Ireland 1930–1942. History of Education: Journal of the History of Education Society, 41(4), 477–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coolahan, J. (1981). Irish education: Its history and structure. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corten, R., & Dronkers, J. (2006). School achievement of pupils from the lower strata in public, private government-dependent and private government-independent schools: A cross-national test of the Coleman–Hoffer Thesis. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(2), 179–208.

  • CSO. (2000). That was then, this is now. Change in Ireland, 1949–1999: A publication to mark the 50th anniversary of the Central Statistics Office. Dublin: Central Statistics Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • DES. (2010). Report of the project maths implementation support group. Department of Education and Skills, Republic of Ireland. http://www.education.ie/en/publications/policy-reports/report-of-the-project-maths-implementation-group.pdf

  • DiMaggio, P. (1982). Cultural capital and school success: The impact of status culture participation on the grades of US high school students. American Sociological Review, 47(2), 189–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, J. (1968). The hedge schools of Ireland. Cork: The Mercier Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engineers Ireland. (2010). Report of taskforce on education of mathematics and science at second level by engineers Ireland. http://webpages.dcu.ie/~bradysa/CASTEL_report_uploads/20100211-Mathematics_and_Science_at_Second_Level.pdf

  • Felix, A., & Harris, J. (2010). A project-based, STEM-integrated alternative energy team challenge for teachers. Technology Teacher, 69(5), 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georg, W. (2004). Cultural capital and social inequality in the life course. European Sociological Review, 20(4), 333–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson, J. (2010). Curriculum in context: Partnership, power and praxis in Ireland. Oxford: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodson, I. (1983). Subjects for study: Aspects of a social history of curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 15(4), 391–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodson, I. F., & Mangan, J. F. (1995). Subject cultures and the introduction of classroom computers. British Educational Research Journal, 21(5), 613–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HEA. (2014). Consultation paper: Towards the development of a new National plan for equity of access to higher education. Dublin: Higher Education Authority. https://static.rasset.ie/documents/news/access-consultation-paper.pdf

  • Hyland, Á. (2011). Entry to higher education in Ireland in the 21st century. Dublin: National Council for Curriculum and Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUA. (2012). Reform of selection and entry to university in the context of national educational policy. Dublin: Irish University Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuenzi, J., Matthews, C., & Mangan, B. (2006). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education issues and legislative options. Congressional Research Report. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

  • LaPorte, J. (2009). Passing the Baton at the intersection of acronymonium and heritage roads. Journal of Technology Education, 21(1), 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (2012). Newmanagerialism as a political project: The Irish case. In K. Lynch, B. Grummell, & D. Devine (Eds.), New managerialism in education: Commercialisation, carelessness and gender. London: Palgrave McMillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, D. (2006). Culture, politics and Irish education since the 1950s. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2009). PISA 2009 assessment framework—Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2014). Education at a Glance 2014: OECD indicators. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. http://www.oecd.org/edu/Education-at-a-Glance-2014.pdf

  • Paechter, C. (1993). What happens when a school subject undergoes a sudden change of status? Curriculum Studies, 1(3), 349–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, J. (2009). Blurring the boundaries—STEM education and education for sustainable development. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 14(1), 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, D. (2005). The origins, early development and status of Bourdieu’s concept of ‘cultural capital’. The British Journal of Sociology, 56(1), 13–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taskforce on the Physical Sciences. (2001). Report of the task force on physical sciences. http://www.irlgov.ie/educ/pub.htm

  • Tormey, R. (2011). Subject disciplines, interdisciplinarity and education for sustainable development. In T. Batteson & R. Tormey (Eds.), Teaching global perspectives: Introducing student teachers to development education (pp. 45–57). Dublin: Liffey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trant, A., Branson, J., & Frangos, C. (1999). Reconciling liberal and vocational education. Dublin: CDVEC Curriculum Development Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Werfhorst, H. G., Sullivan, A., & Cheung, S. Y. (2003). Social class, ability and choice of subject in secondary and tertiary education in Britain. British Educational Research Journal, 29(1), 41–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Moore, T., Roehrig, G., & Park, M. (2011). STEM integration: Teacher perceptions and practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 1(2), 1–13.

  • Whelan, C., & Hannan, D. (1999). Class inequalities in educational attainment among the adult population in the Republic of Ireland. Economic and Social Review, 30(3), 285–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. (2011). STEM education: Proceed with caution. Design and Technology Education, 16(1), 26–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. (1975). An approach to the study of curricula as socially organized knowledge. In M. Golby, J. Greenwald, & R. West (Eds.), Curriculum design (pp. 100–127). London: The Open University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Education and Professional Studies, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland

    Oliver McGarr & Raymond Lynch

Authors
  1. Oliver McGarr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Raymond Lynch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver McGarr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McGarr, O., Lynch, R. Monopolising the STEM agenda in second-level schools: exploring power relations and subject subcultures. Int J Technol Des Educ 27, 51–62 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9333-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9333-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation