Abstract
With the recognition of the importance of collaboration in a design studio and the advancement of technology, increasing numbers of design students collaborate with others in a technology-mediated learning environment (TMLE); however, not all students have positive experiences in TMLEs. One possible reason for unsatisfactory collaboration experiences is that existing text-oriented collaboration technology may not fully support interior design students’ needs for spontaneous interaction with visual images. The purpose of the current research was to determine whether a visually supported collaboration technology (VSCT) for designers, enhances students’ collaboration experiences in a TMLE. A total of 28 junior interior design students participated in the study, all of whom engaged in similar group projects via two collaboration modalities: face-to-face and VSCT. The results show that collaboration modalities influence students’ learning experiences, in particular, achievement and confidence in completing collaborative tasks. When using VSCT, students achieved significantly higher grade and demonstrated higher confidence in completing collaborative tasks compared to face-to-face collaboration; however, no significant differences were reported in either their perception of the collaboration process or their evaluation of the medium in the two collaboration modalities. The findings demonstrate that VSCT enhanced students’ collaboration experiences in design studio. Discussion and implications are provided to facilitate design students’ positive collaboration experiences in a TMLE.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Institute of Architects. (2006). The business of architecture. Retrieved from http://www.aia.org/aiaucmp/groups/ek_public/documents/pdf/aiab083575.pdf
Arias, E., Eden, H., Fischer, G., Gorman, A., & Scharff, E. (2000). Transcending the individual human mind—Creating shared understanding through collaborative design. ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction (TOCHI), 7(1), 84–113.
Asojo, A. O. (2007). Technology as a tool for globalization: Cross-cultural collaborative design studio projects. Journal of Interior Design, 33(2), 23–36.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Bowen, J. A. (2012). Teaching naked : How moving technology.
Byun, S. E., Kim, H., & Duffey, M. (2012). A multicourse collaborative project within a global context: Multidimensional learning outcomes for merchandising and interior design majors. Clothing and Textile Research Journal, 30(3), 200–216.
Chen, W., & You, M. (2010). Student response to an internet-mediated industrial design studio course. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20, 151–174.
Chiu, S.-H. (2010). Students’ knowledge sources and knowledge sharing in the design studio—An exploratory study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20, 27–42.
Cho, J. Y., & Cho, M.-H. (2014). Student perceptions and performance in online and offline collaboration in an interior design studio. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16, 79–95.
Council for Interior Design Accreditation (CIDA). (2014). Professional standards 2014. Retrieved from http://accredit-id.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Professional-Standards-2014.pdf
Davis, C. (2007). The significance of culture and collaboration. Design intelligence. Retrieved from http://www.di.net/articles/the_significance_culture_collaboration/
Davis, C. H. F., III, Deil-Amen, R., Rios-Aguilar, C., & González Canché, M. S. (2012) Social media and higher education: A literature review and research directions. Report printed by the University of Arizona and Claremont Graduate University.
Deutsch, R. (2014). How we can make collaboration work. Design Intelligence, 20(1), 40–45.
DiDonato, N. C. (2013). Effective self- and co-regulation in collaborative learning groups: An analysis of how students regulate problem solving of authentic interdisciplinary tasks. Instructional Science, 41(1), 25–47.
Faidley, J., Evensen, D. H., Salisbury-Glennon, J., Glenn, J., & Hmelo, C. E. (2000). How are we doing? Methods of assessing group processing in a problem-based learning context. In D. H. Evensen & C. E. Hmelo (Eds.), Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 109–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gale, A. J., Martin, D., Martin, K., & Duffey, M. A. (2014). The burnout phenomenon: A comparative study of student attitudes toward collaborative learning and sustainability. Journal of Interior Design, 39(1), 17–31. doi:10.1111/joid.12022
Hennessy, S., & Murphy, P. (1999). The potential for collaborative problem solving in design and technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 9(1), 1–36.
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2013). Audio-based versus text-based asynchronous online discussion: Two case studies. Instructional Science, 41(2), 365–380.
Leung W. (2014). Top 100 giants: Growth. Interior design. Retrieved from http://www.interiordesign.net/articles/detail/35862-2014-top-100-giants-growth/
Little, P., & Cardenas, M. (2001). Use of “studio” methods in the introductory engineering design curriculum. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(3), 309–318.
McCormick, R. (2004). Collaboration: The challenge of ICT. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14, 159–176.
Meneely, J., & Portillo, M. (2005). The adaptable mind in design: Relating personality, cognitive style, and creative performance. Creativity Research Journal, 17(2–3), 155–166.
Pektaş, Ş. T., & Erkip, F. (2006). Attitudes of design students toward computer usage in design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16, 79–95.
Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.
Sagun, A., & Demirkan, H. (2009). On-line critiques in collaborative design studio. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(1), 79–99.
Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., Viilo, M., & Hakkarainen, K. (2010). Learning by collaborative designing: Technology-enhanced knowledge practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20, 109–136.
Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). Sources of self-efficacy in school: Critical review of the literature and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 751–796.
Webb, J. D., & Miller, N. G. (2006). Some preparation required: The journey to successful studio collaboration. Journal of Interior Design, 31(2), 1–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cho, J.Y., Cho, MH. & Kozinets, N. Does the medium matter in collaboration? Using visually supported collaboration technology in an interior design studio. Int J Technol Des Educ 26, 567–586 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9322-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9322-3