Skip to main content
Log in

Does the medium matter in collaboration? Using visually supported collaboration technology in an interior design studio

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the recognition of the importance of collaboration in a design studio and the advancement of technology, increasing numbers of design students collaborate with others in a technology-mediated learning environment (TMLE); however, not all students have positive experiences in TMLEs. One possible reason for unsatisfactory collaboration experiences is that existing text-oriented collaboration technology may not fully support interior design students’ needs for spontaneous interaction with visual images. The purpose of the current research was to determine whether a visually supported collaboration technology (VSCT) for designers, enhances students’ collaboration experiences in a TMLE. A total of 28 junior interior design students participated in the study, all of whom engaged in similar group projects via two collaboration modalities: face-to-face and VSCT. The results show that collaboration modalities influence students’ learning experiences, in particular, achievement and confidence in completing collaborative tasks. When using VSCT, students achieved significantly higher grade and demonstrated higher confidence in completing collaborative tasks compared to face-to-face collaboration; however, no significant differences were reported in either their perception of the collaboration process or their evaluation of the medium in the two collaboration modalities. The findings demonstrate that VSCT enhanced students’ collaboration experiences in design studio. Discussion and implications are provided to facilitate design students’ positive collaboration experiences in a TMLE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Institute of Architects. (2006). The business of architecture. Retrieved from http://www.aia.org/aiaucmp/groups/ek_public/documents/pdf/aiab083575.pdf

  • Arias, E., Eden, H., Fischer, G., Gorman, A., & Scharff, E. (2000). Transcending the individual human mind—Creating shared understanding through collaborative design. ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction (TOCHI), 7(1), 84–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asojo, A. O. (2007). Technology as a tool for globalization: Cross-cultural collaborative design studio projects. Journal of Interior Design, 33(2), 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, J. A. (2012). Teaching naked : How moving technology.

  • Byun, S. E., Kim, H., & Duffey, M. (2012). A multicourse collaborative project within a global context: Multidimensional learning outcomes for merchandising and interior design majors. Clothing and Textile Research Journal, 30(3), 200–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., & You, M. (2010). Student response to an internet-mediated industrial design studio course. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20, 151–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, S.-H. (2010). Students’ knowledge sources and knowledge sharing in the design studio—An exploratory study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20, 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, J. Y., & Cho, M.-H. (2014). Student perceptions and performance in online and offline collaboration in an interior design studio. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16, 79–95.

  • Council for Interior Design Accreditation (CIDA). (2014). Professional standards 2014. Retrieved from http://accredit-id.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Professional-Standards-2014.pdf

  • Davis, C. (2007). The significance of culture and collaboration. Design intelligence. Retrieved from http://www.di.net/articles/the_significance_culture_collaboration/

  • Davis, C. H. F., III, Deil-Amen, R., Rios-Aguilar, C., & González Canché, M. S. (2012) Social media and higher education: A literature review and research directions. Report printed by the University of Arizona and Claremont Graduate University.

  • Deutsch, R. (2014). How we can make collaboration work. Design Intelligence, 20(1), 40–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiDonato, N. C. (2013). Effective self- and co-regulation in collaborative learning groups: An analysis of how students regulate problem solving of authentic interdisciplinary tasks. Instructional Science, 41(1), 25–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faidley, J., Evensen, D. H., Salisbury-Glennon, J., Glenn, J., & Hmelo, C. E. (2000). How are we doing? Methods of assessing group processing in a problem-based learning context. In D. H. Evensen & C. E. Hmelo (Eds.), Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 109–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, A. J., Martin, D., Martin, K., & Duffey, M. A. (2014). The burnout phenomenon: A comparative study of student attitudes toward collaborative learning and sustainability. Journal of Interior Design, 39(1), 17–31. doi:10.1111/joid.12022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennessy, S., & Murphy, P. (1999). The potential for collaborative problem solving in design and technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 9(1), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2013). Audio-based versus text-based asynchronous online discussion: Two case studies. Instructional Science, 41(2), 365–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung W. (2014). Top 100 giants: Growth. Interior design. Retrieved from http://www.interiordesign.net/articles/detail/35862-2014-top-100-giants-growth/

  • Little, P., & Cardenas, M. (2001). Use of “studio” methods in the introductory engineering design curriculum. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(3), 309–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, R. (2004). Collaboration: The challenge of ICT. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14, 159–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meneely, J., & Portillo, M. (2005). The adaptable mind in design: Relating personality, cognitive style, and creative performance. Creativity Research Journal, 17(2–3), 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pektaş, Ş. T., & Erkip, F. (2006). Attitudes of design students toward computer usage in design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16, 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagun, A., & Demirkan, H. (2009). On-line critiques in collaborative design studio. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(1), 79–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., Viilo, M., & Hakkarainen, K. (2010). Learning by collaborative designing: Technology-enhanced knowledge practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20, 109–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). Sources of self-efficacy in school: Critical review of the literature and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 751–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, J. D., & Miller, N. G. (2006). Some preparation required: The journey to successful studio collaboration. Journal of Interior Design, 31(2), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moon-Heum Cho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cho, J.Y., Cho, MH. & Kozinets, N. Does the medium matter in collaboration? Using visually supported collaboration technology in an interior design studio. Int J Technol Des Educ 26, 567–586 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9322-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9322-3

Keywords

Navigation