Skip to main content
Log in

Experiential learning of electronics subject matter in middle school robotics courses

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether the experiential learning of electronics subject matter is effective in the middle school open learning of robotics. Electronics is often ignored in robotics courses. Since robotics courses are typically comprised of computer-related subjects, and mechanical and electrical engineering, these three areas should be emphasized equally. Many studies reveal impressive learning of computer science and mechanical engineering, but clear evidence of the effectiveness of electronics learning in the higher order thinking skills of middle school students is still lacking. We designed three different robotics courses with electronics subject matter introduced through experiential learning. A parallel group design was used, where three different open learning courses were implemented for middle school students. Based on results of the first and second implementations, we improved students’ learning of relevant content for each successive step of the experiment. In total, 381 middle school students participated in all experiments and were surveyed using pre- and post-tests. The collected data were analyzed using a quantitative research methodology. The findings revealed that the teaching approach was effective. During the learning process, student interest in robotics increased, and overall achievement improved with a medium effect size (η2 = 0.13). The best results for the learning of electronics subject matter were found in the learning process (η2 = 0.44), where experimental sharing of electronics parts was the most evident approach used by the students. Examination of learning material structure in light of the shared electronics subject matter is analyzed and discussed and possible directions for future research are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abderrahim, M. (2012). A New open source 3D-printable mobile robotic platform for education. Advances in Autonomous Mini Robots,. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-27482-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avsec, S., & Kocijancic, S. (2014). Effectiveness of inquiry-based learning: How do middle school students learn to maximize efficacy of water turbine? International Journal of Engineering Education, 30(6A), 1436–1449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avsec, S., Rihtarsic, D., & Kocijancic, S. (2014). A predictive study of learner attitudes toward open learning in a robotics class. Journal of Science Education and Technology,. doi:10.1007/s10956-014-9496-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M., & Zadok, Y. (2007). Robotics projects and learning concepts in science, technology and problem solving. International Journal of Technology and Design Education,. doi:10.1007/s10798-007-9043-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, B. S., & Ansorge, J. (2007). Robotics as means to increase achievement scores in an informal learning environment. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, B. S., Nugent, G., & Grandgenett, N. F. (2013). Examining fidelity of program implementation in a STEM-oriented out-of-school setting. International Journal of Technology and Design Education,. doi:10.1007/s10798-013-9245-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. W., Lee, J. H., Chao, P. Y., Wang, C. Y., & Chen, G. D. (2010). Exploring the possibility of using humanoid robots as instructional tools for teaching a second language in primary school. Educational Technology and Society, 13(2), 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, E. (2012). Learning mathematics with robots. In INTED2012 Proceedings (pp. 5954–5958). Valencia, Spain.

  • Floreano, D., Mitri, S., & Hubert, J. (2010). A robotic platform for studying the evolution of communication. Evolution of Communication,. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-01250-1_19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gastwirth, J. L., Gel, Y. R., & Weiwen, M. (2009). The impact of Levene’s test of equality of variances on statistical practice. In Statistical Science (Ed.), 24(3) (pp. 343–360). Beachwood: Institude of Mathematical Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • González, J. J., Jiménez, J. A., & Ovalle, D. A. (2010). Technological developments in networking. Education and Automation,. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9151-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heng, I., Zhang, A. S., & Heimbinder, M. (2012). Development of a low-cost mobile embedded handheld aircasting device. International Journal of Engineering Research and Innovation, 4(3), 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilal, A. R., Wagdy, K. M., Khamis, A. M. (2007). A Survey on Commercial Starter Kits for Building Real Robots. In Proceedings of 2nd international conference on electrical engineering, CEE07, Coimbra, Portugal.

  • Jin, Y.-G., Chong, L. M., & Cho, H.-K. (2012). Designing a robotics-enhanced learning content for STEAM education. 2012 9th international conference on ubiquitous robots and ambient intelligence (URAI), doi: 10.1109/URAI.2012.6463032

  • Johnson, J. (2003). Children, robotics, and education. Artificial Life and Robotics,. doi:10.1007/s10015-003-0265-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., Oh, H., Choi, J., & Tsourdos, A. (2014). Using hands-on project with lego mindstorms in a graduate course *. International Journal of Engineering Education, 30(2), 458–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knörig, A., Wettach, B., Cohen, J., (2009) Fritzing: a tool for advancing electronic prototyping for designers. In TEI ‘09 proceedings of the 3rd international conference on tangible and embedded interaction, doi: 10.1145/1517664.1517735

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2012). Experiential Learning Theory. In N. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 1215–1219). Boston: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petre, M., & Price, B. (2004). Using robotics to motivate “Back Door” learning. Education and Information Technologies,. doi:10.1023/B:EAIT.0000027927.78380.60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rihtaršič, D., & Kocijancic, S. (2012). The role of equipment and accessories in the early teaching of robotics. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 10(1), 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rihtaršič, D., & Kocijančič, S. (2013). Introducing engineering to middle school students through technology day of robotics. Journal of Technology and Information Education, 5(2), 175–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rihtaršič, D., Šantej, G., & Kocijancic, S. (2011). Promoting engineering studies through summer camps of electronics and robotics. In 2nd WIETE annual conference on engineering and technology education (pp. 25–28). Pattaya, Thailand.

  • Robinson, M. (2005). Robotics-driven activities: Can they improve middle school science learning? Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society,. doi:10.1177/0270467604271244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-del-solar, J., Member, S., & Avilés, R. (2004). Robotics courses for children as a motivation tool: The chilean experience. IEEE Transactions on Education, 47(4), 474–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruzzenente, M., Koo, M., Nielsen, K., Grespan, L., & Fiorini, P. (2012). A review of robotics kits for tertiary education. In proceedings of 3rd international workshop teaching robotics, teaching with robotics integrating robotics in school curriculum (pp. 153–162). Riva del Garda, Italy.

  • Shih, B.-Y., Chang, C.-J., Chen, Y.-H., Chen, C.-Y., & Liang, Y.-D. (2012). Lego NXT information on test dimensionality using Kolb’s innovative learning cycle. Natural Hazards,. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0318-y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silk, E. M., Higashi, R., Shoop, R., & Schunn, C. D. (2010). Designing technology activities that teach mathematics. The Technology Teacher, 69(4), 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slangen, L., Keulen, H., & Gravemeijer, K. (2011). What pupils can learn from working with robotic direct manipulation environments. International Journal of Technology and Design Education,. doi:10.1007/s10798-010-9130-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somyürek, S. (2014). An effective educational tool: construction kits for fun and meaningful learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education,. doi:10.1007/s10798-014-9272-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ucgul, M., & Cagiltay, K. (2013). Design and development issues for educational robotics training camps. International Journal of Technology and Design Education,. doi:10.1007/s10798-013-9253-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandevelde, C., & Vanderborght, B. (2013). Overview of Technologies for Building Robots in the Classroom. In International conference on robotics in education, proceedings (pp. 122–130). Lodz, Poland.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Rihtaršič.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rihtaršič, D., Avsec, S. & Kocijancic, S. Experiential learning of electronics subject matter in middle school robotics courses. Int J Technol Des Educ 26, 205–224 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9310-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9310-7

Keywords

Navigation